The social production of money: archaeological perspectives | Tue Dec 17 14:00:00 | Room 728
Money is a commonplace of complex societies, and evidence for its production and use appears in the archaeological record at multiple scales: from individual coins, dies, and weights, to mint buildings, metallurgical workshops, and mining complexes. The character, scope, and volume of this evidence means that archaeology can offer significant and unique contributions to wider anthropological and sociological debates concerning the socio-cultural processes by which money comes into being: how are objects transformed into money, how are different forms of money rendered legitimate or illegitimate, and how are the social conventions behind money maintained or challenged by its producers and (non)users? This session explores the social production of money and moneys in past societies, with a focus on five key themes:
- The assignation of value to monetary media
- Legitimation and validation of moneys
- Fungibility and commensuration of moneys
- Money and institutions
- Hierarchies of money
14:00 | Session organisers
14:10 | Piotr Jacobsson, Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre
Beyond earlier Holocene commodification in south-west Asia
Emergence of commodities, that is objects whose role is to be exchanged, is fundamental to the development of any monetary economy. However, commodification is not inherent in human communities. Already Adam Smith and his contemporaries were aware, by extension from non-European communities known to them, that prehistoric people would have had very different economic lives with limited basis for the emergence of commodity-based economy.
14:30 | Charlotte Mann, University of Warwick
Spent or Saved? The Circulation of Festival Coins Struck for the Eleusinian Mysteries
The bronze coins produced for visitors to the Eleusinian mysteries between 500-400 BCE constitute a small, but intriguing, subset of Athenian currency. Struck with Eleusinian ritual imagery and the ethnic ‘of Eleusis,’ these coins raise questions concerning deme administration, festival organisation and mint management in Classical Athens that are of interest to historians and numismatists alike.
14:50 | Tais Pagoto Bélo, Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, University of São Paulo
Coins and Roman Women’s Power
This presentation will demonstrate the public image of Roman imperial women through coins, during the Julio-Claudian dynasty (63 BC – 68 AD). In this period, which involved women of five generations, it will be shown how these characters managed to improve their visibility in public life through tasks related to the imperial family, which led to Patronage and consequently to self-propaganda, encompassing their own images in coins, a a way to demonstrate power. Roman imperial women of that time were restricted to a private and domestic life due to the existence of the patria potesta, which was significant and marked the father's power relations within the Roman family, classifying women as unequal to men. The conquest that they had in having their names remembered, through statues, plaques, and coins was something recent at the end of the Republic and beginning of the Empire, and was established through Patronage. Coins with representations of imperial women make it possible not only to chronologically reconstruct their existence in history, but also to demonstrate that they were active in public life and had power to obtain the coinage of their images. In this context, by using coins as a material source, this presentation will have as its purpose the demonstration of the public force that these imperial women conquered, even though they were under the potesta of their fathers, husbands or brothers.
15:10 | Dagfinn Skre, Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo
A social approach to money. Scandinavia in the 5th-10th centuries
This paper advocates a social rather than a precious-metal approach to monetisation. The social role of money is best explored by shifting the attention from the classic money media, gold and silver, to the dissemination of two social practices: valuing and paying. When these two monetary practices first became widespread in western Scandinavia during the gold-rich migration period (in the 5th to 6th centuries AD, they were not introduced in the sphere of trade, but instead were features of traditional or customary payments, such as weregeld (atonements for murder or offences against the person) or marriage dowries. By the Viking Age, in the late 8th to 10th centuries AD, despite flourishing commodity production, precious metals were used as payment in trade solely in towns. Even in towns, this commercial use seems to have been adopted late, and was employed only occasionally. Such shifts in the uses of money media should not be understood as fluctuation in trade, but rather as a consequence of shifting preference and availability of various media of payment, precious-metal bullion or coinage being but one of them.
15:30 | Murray Andrews, UCL
|15:40 | BREAK|
16:10 | Martin Allen, Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge
Rendlesham: the use of coins at a high status early medieval site
Since 2007 a team of metal detectorists has been systematically surveying land at Rendlesham in Suffolk that was the site of a royal residence of the early Anglo-Saxon kings of East Anglia, who were buried at Sutton Hoo nearby. In 2017 the fieldwork at Rendlesham became the basis of a 30-month research project by the Institute of Archaeology at UCL in partnership with the Fitzwilliam Museum and the University of East Anglia, Lordship and Landscape in East Anglia AD 400−800. The work at Rendlesham has recovered thousands of coins and artefacts of other kinds, from the Roman period onwards, and the site is particularly rich in early medieval gold and silver finds.
16:30 | Svein H Gullbekk, Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo
The social production of money involves negotiations of trust, acceptance and value, concepts that are closely related to questions about authority, culture and traditions. In this paper, I discuss the construction of trust, and legitimization of coinage and commodities as currency. Emphasis is placed on the relationship between religion and money using medieval Europe as laboratory: Was religious belief used for legitimizing trust in currencies? Medieval society was embedded in a Christian culture with perceptions of money that were paradoxical in their objectives and practice: On one side the Devil who used money as tools to turn souls away from God, on the other the Church producing and using money on grand scale. In reality, was the church legitimizing secular monetary regimes? How would secular authorities utilize Christian belief systems for producing trust in currency? Everywhere social production of money involved a variety of means and processes. Religious justification, doctrine and practice was central to the acceptance of particular forms of money, with parallels to modern societies.
16:50 | Laura Burnett, University of Exeter
"For the benefit of the poor"?
If money is power then issuing money demonstrates and creates power. Normally states tightly control this power but private or semi-official monies are found in many societies and periods from Roman Limes Falsa to German Notgeld and the cryptocurrencies and community currencies of today. While private monies are collected and their issuers studied their actual functioning has seldom been explored to any great extent and is often poorly understood.
17:10 | Olav Gundersen, Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo
|17:30 | END|