User story feedback on Research Facilitation. "All requirements met."
Summary: Karoline contacted IT for SLMS in January 2018 regarding storage provision for 15TB of genetics data for several projects. I met with Karoline in April to discuss her requirements further and I suggested that use of Data Safe Haven was required for identifiable data, and that the (then) forthcoming GDPR would clarify how researchers should handle such data. I also gave her some details about use of Research Computing platforms, especially Legion, and Research Data Services (RDS). I gather that she has since made progress on using Legion and RDS for non-identifiable data..
Q1 What is the title of your research project?
Genetics of complex traits.
Q2 Briefly, what were the queries or requirements you contacted us research facilitators about?
Whether data needs to be stored on safe haven or lower level protection appropriate. How to get account.
Q3 What suggestions do you have for Research IT Service facilitators to improve on for a very similar request?
No suggestions for improvement. They were very helpful.
Q4 How far do you feel the applications / tools / services / advice we provided you with meet with your requirement?
All requirements met.
Q5 If you were recommended tools or services (Research Computing, Information Governance Advisory, Data Safe Haven, Research Data Services, etc.), how effective was our facilitation service in providing you information and getting your accounts?
Q6 What differences, if any, do the recommended IT tools / services make to your research work compared to before you used such tools / services?