Close
At the start of the department’s research programme on science advice, UCL STEaPP organised two high-impact academic workshops in 2015 that contributed to at least 16 publications in subsequent years.
UCL STEaPP funded and organised a theoretical workshop on ‘Latour and Environmental Governance’ at Cumberland Lodge, Windsor on 18–19 May 2015 and a workshop on ‘Empirical Studies of Roles of Scientific Advisors’ at UCL 188 Tottenham Court Road, London on 18 June 2015. The organisation of both workshops was led by Professor Arthur Petersen.
This page contains the programmes of both workshops and up-to-date links to the subsequent published versions of the papers that were discussed at these workshops.
UCL STEaPP workshop on ‘Latour and Environmental Governance’
Programme
Final publications (containing adapted and completed workshop papers):
- Matthijs Kouw & Arthur Petersen (2018), ‘Diplomacy in action: Latourian politics and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’, Science & Technology Studies 31 (1): 52–68.
- Mark Brown (2018), ‘Speaking for nature: Hobbes, Latour, and the democratic representation of nonhumans’, Science & Technology Studies 31 (1): 31–51.
- Philip Conway (2016), ‘Back down to Earth: Reassembling Latour’s Anthropocenic geopolitics’, Global Discourse 6 (1–2): 43–71.
- Arjen Zegwaard (2016), Mud: Deltas Dealing with Uncertainties, PhD thesis, VU University Amsterdam.
- Werner Krauss (2019), ‘Postenvironmental landscapes in the Anthropocene’, in Peter Howard, Ian Thompson, Emma Waterton & Mick Atha (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Landscape Studies, 2nd edition, 62–73.
- Jasper Montana (2020), ‘Balancing authority and meaning in global environmental assessment: An analysis of organisational logics and modes in IPBES’, Environmental Science & Policy 112 (July): 245–253.
- Jasmine Livingston, Eva Lövbrand & Johanna Alkan Olsson (2018), ‘From climates multiple to climate singular: Maintaining policy-relevance in the IPCC synthesis report’, Environmental Science & Policy 90 (December): 83–90.
- Kari De Pryck (2021), ‘Intergovernmental expert consensus in the making: The case of the Summary for Policy Makers of the IPCC 2014 Synthesis Report’, Global Environmental Politics 21 (1): 108–129.
UCL STEaPP workshop on ‘Empirical Studies of Roles of Scientific Advisors’
Programme
Introductory paper
Final publications (containing adapted and completed workshop papers):
- Adam Cooper, Lorenzo Marvulli, Katie Black, John Holmes & Harshal Mehta (2021), ‘Engineering advice in policy making: A new domain of inquiry in evidence and policy’, Evidence & Policy 17 (3): 487–505 (open access version can be found here).
- Candice Howarth & James Painter (2016), ‘Exploring the science–policy interface on climate decision-making in the UK: The role of the IPCC in informing local decision-making in the UK’, Palgrave Communications 2:16058.
- Eva Kunseler (2016), ‘Revealing a paradox in scientific advice to governments: The struggle between modernist and reflexive logics within the PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency’, Palgrave Communications 2: 16029.
- Eva Kunseler (2017), Government Expert Organisations in-between Logics: Practising Participatory Knowledge Production at the PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, DPA thesis, VU University Amsterdam.
- Caroline Kenny, Carla-Leanne Washbourne, Chris Tyler & Jason Blackstock (2017), ‘Legislative science advice in Europe: The case for international comparative research’, Palgrave Communications 3:17030.
- Jack Stilgoe (2016), ‘Scientific advice on the move: The UK mobile phone risk issue as a public experiment’, Palgrave Communications 2:16028.
- Pita Spruijt, Anne Knol, Arthur Petersen & Erik Lebret (2016), ‘Differences in views of experts about their role in particulate matter policy advice: Empirical evidence from an international expert consultation’, Environmental Science & Policy 59 (May): 44–52.
- Pita Spruijt (2016), Expert Views on Scientific Policy Advice on Complex Environmental Health Issues, PhD thesis, Utrecht University.