I am currently a British Academy Post-doctoral fellow at University College London (Department of Economics). My research fields are Applied Microeconomics and Labor Economics, and my research also relates to Behavioral and Experimental Economics. In my current research, I investigate the role of beliefs in educational investment decisions and the role of educational interventions in fostering skills in childhood.
I am on the job market this year and will be available for interviews at the 2018 ASSA Annual Meeting in Philadelphia, the SAEe meetings in Barcelona and the RES meetings in London.
- Applied Microeconomics
- Labor Economics
- Behavioral and Experimental Economics.
Students from low socio-economic backgrounds are significantly less likely to go to university compared to students from more advantaged backgrounds with similar levels of skills. While traditional models emphasize the role of credit constraints in explaining the socio-economic gap in university attendance, we investigate to what extent the gap can be explained by differences in beliefs about the pecuniary and non-pecuniary benefits of university education. For this purpose, we elicit students' beliefs about the benefits of attending university as well as their intentions to go to university in a sample of 2,540 students in England. Our analysis proceeds in three steps. First, we document that students with low socio-economic status perceive both the pecuniary and non-pecuniary returns to university to be significantly lower. Second, we derive and estimate a choice model which allows us to investigate the relative importance of different factors. For both low and high socio-economic status students, the perceived non-pecuniary benefits can explain a large share of the variation in intentions to go to university. Amongst the non-pecuniary outcomes, expected job satisfaction, parental approval, and perceptions about social life during the 3-4 years after finishing school play an important role in the decision. Third, we perform a decomposition analysis and find that 49% of the socio-economic gap can be explained by differences in beliefs across socio-economic groups, and that 37% can be explained by differences in beliefs about the non-pecuniary returns alone.
- Orazio Attanasio (UCL)
- Sule Alan (University of Essex)
- Douglas Bernheim (Stanford University)
- Richard Blundell (UCL)
- Hamish Low (University of Cambridge)