XClose

UCL Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy

Home
Menu

Global Policy publishes article by STEaPP academics, Luís Miguel Lacerda and Jean-Christophe Mauduit

17 August 2023

Dr Lacerda, Policy Adviser, Policy Impact Unit, STEaPP and co-author Dr Mauduit, Lecturer in Science Diplomacy, STEaPP, have recently published an article in Global Policy exploring the role that scientific diasporas and other non-state actors can play in modern science diplomacy

Portugese flag
The article, ‘New architectures for bottom-up science diplomacy: Learning from the evolving Portuguese diaspora in the UK’, published in July 2023, provides a multi-stakeholder perspective that analyses the creation, during the lead-up to Brexit, of the first ever scientific advisory board (SAB) at a Portuguese Embassy. Along with co-author Manuel Heitor, Professor at the Technical University of Lisbon and Science Minister of Portugal during the creation of the SAB, Drs. Lacerda and Mauduit discuss how knowledge transfer networks such as scientific diasporas can increase the relative influence of a country.

 

The authors show that there are clear opportunities to build novel policy instruments that leverage the scientific diasporas, using both bottom-up and top-down approaches. However, they argue that only a science diplomacy strategy developed in collaboration between scientists, diplomats and policymakers will allow for the scientific diaspora to fulfil its full potential. Yet, breaking the otherwise traditional boundaries of the ‘national system of innovation’ by involving these external actors in the co-development of a strategy brings institutional challenges.

They note that these networks are particularly complex to sustain, and that their systematic and long-term action relies very much on conjunctural and individual engagement from the diasporas. Hence, government actors need to help sustain the engagement of these diasporas by setting up institutional structures, processes and policies that support them. In addition, these various communities of practice which operate under different ‘cultures’ may find it difficult to speak the same language and to develop a common understanding of science diplomacy. Hence, taking into account the priorities and political pressures of policymakers, the processes and institutions they navigate, as well as the preoccupations of the scientific diaspora and challenges of sustaining academic research, both actors need to establish clear communication channels and structures to co-design a meaningful and effective science diplomacy strategy.


Further reading:

New architectures for bottom-up science diplomacy: Learning from the evolving Portuguese diaspora in the UK

Developing science advice at the Embassy of Portugal in the United Kingdom

Supporting knowledge intermediaries to improve science policy interfaces and tackle global challenges