Skip to main content
UCL Logo Navigate back to homepage

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Study

    Study

    • Study at UCL
    • Prospective students
    • Current students
    • Accommodation
    • Careers
    • Doctoral School
    • Immigration and visas
    • Student finances
    • Support and wellbeing
  • Research

    Research

    • Research at UCL
    • Engage with us
    • Explore our Research
    • Initiatives and networks
    • Research news
  • Engage

    Engage

    • Engage with UCL
    • Alumni
    • Business partnerships and collaboration
    • Global engagement
    • News and Media relations
    • Public Policy
    • Schools and priority groups
    • Give to UCL
  • About

    About

    • About UCL
    • Who we are
    • Faculties
    • Governance
    • President and Provost
    • Strategy
    • UCL's Bicentenary
  • UCL Logo Active parent page: UCL Faculty of Laws
    • About us
    • Study
    • Short Courses
    • Active parent page: Research
    • People
    • Alumni
    • News
    • Events

Beyond acts and omissions: remark-able criminal conduct

By Mark Dsouza (Associate Professor at UCL Laws)

Top of the Old Bailey in Central London

Breadcrumb trail

  • Faculty of Laws

Faculty menu

  • Current page: Publications
    • Policy Briefs

Breadcrumb trail

  • Faculty of Laws
  • Research
  • Beyond acts and omissions: remark-able criminal conduct

Publication details

Dsouza, Mark (2021) ‘Beyond acts and omissions: remark-able criminal conduct’, Legal Studies, 41(1), pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1017/lst.2020.44.

Summary

This paper proposes that instead of analysing a criminal offence’s conduct element in terms of acts and omissions, we should ask whether the defendant has belied a contextually salient expectation as to how she should, or routinely would, conduct herself. Slightly different sets of expectations are salient depending on whether our interest is in questions of criminalisation, or the proper interpretation of existing offences, but the criminal law is normally interested only in conduct-tokens that belie a relevant expectation. Belying such an expectation need not itself suggest culpability, but it does mark out the conduct as remark-able, in the sense of being ‘worthy of remark’.

This ‘Remark-able Conduct Requirement’ (RCR) analysis helps us narrow the field of conduct-tokens that are normatively appropriate candidates for criminalisation. Moreover, when adapted for use in interpreting existing offences, not only does it generate familiar and plausible liability outcomes and simplify the application of the law, but it also offers a principled argument to limit the scope of offences drafted in overly broad terms. By excluding innocuous doings from potential criminal liability, it allows us, for instance, to limit the scope of some terrorism offences that appear, at first glance, to treat mundane acts as the basis for extremely serious offences. Finally, it also suggests ways to make progress on philosophical puzzles about how we should conduct ourselves.

In November 2020, ‘Beyond acts and omissions: remark-able criminal conduct’ was awarded the Society of Legal Scholars Annual Conference Best Paper Prize 2020. The paper was commended for its clarity and originality in its analysis of a complex problem. 

Read a copy of ‘Beyond Acts and Omissions: Remark-able Criminal Conduct’ at https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10115937/

Image credit: © UCL Digital Media, 2018 

UCL footer

Visit

  • Bloomsbury Theatre and Studio
  • Library, Museums and Collections
  • UCL Maps
  • UCL Shop
  • Contact UCL

Students

  • Accommodation
  • Current Students
  • Moodle
  • Students' Union

Staff

  • Inside UCL
  • Staff Intranet
  • Work at UCL
  • Human Resources
UCL Logo

University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7679 2000

UCL social media menu

  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Youtube
  • Link to TikTok
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Bluesky
  • Link to Threads
  • Link to Soundcloud
Here, it can happen.
Back to top

Essential

  • Disclaimer
  • Freedom of Information
  • Accessibility
  • Cookies
  • Privacy
  • Slavery statement
  • Log in

© 2026 UCL