Skip to main content
UCL Logo Navigate back to homepage

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Study

    Study

    • Study at UCL
    • Prospective students
    • Current students
    • Accommodation
    • Careers
    • Doctoral School
    • Immigration and visas
    • Student finances
    • Support and wellbeing
  • Research

    Research

    • Research at UCL
    • Engage with us
    • Explore our Research
    • Initiatives and networks
    • Research news
  • Engage

    Engage

    • Engage with UCL
    • Alumni
    • Business partnerships and collaboration
    • Global engagement
    • News and Media relations
    • Policy and political engagement
    • Schools and priority groups
    • Give to UCL
  • About

    About

    • About UCL
    • Who we are
    • Faculties
    • Governance
    • President and Provost
    • Strategy
    • UCL's Bicentenary
  • UCL Logo Active parent page: UCL Faculty of Laws
    • About us
    • Study
    • Short Courses
    • Active parent page: Research
    • People
    • Alumni
    • News
    • Events
    • Support us

Proportionality as Fittingness: The Moral Dimension of Proportionality

This paper aims to develop a moral account of proportionality as it figures outside law, with a view to shed light on legal doctrines that employ proportionality reasoning.

A pie chart with four different segments

Breadcrumb trail

  • Faculty of Laws

Faculty menu

  • Current page: Publications
    • Policy Briefs

Breadcrumb trail

  • Faculty of Laws
  • Research
  • Proportionality as Fittingness: The Moral Dimension of Proportionality

About

Letsas, George (2018) ‘Proportionality as Fittingness: The Moral Dimension of Proportionality’, Current Legal Problems. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuy011

Abstract

Outside law we often judge an action to be wrongful in virtue of being disproportionate. This paper aims to develop a moral account of proportionality as it figures outside law, with a view to shed light on legal doctrines that employ proportionality reasoning. The understanding of proportionality as a balancing act between harms and goods, popular amongst lawyers, lacks a moral dimension capable of justifying why disproportionate action is wrong. The paper defends instead a reason-based approach. It argues that the moral dimension of proportionality lies in the idea of obligations of role: an action is proportionate when it fits the reasons that pertain to the normative role of the acting agent, properly understood. Proportionality as fittingness captures better not only the use of proportionality outside law but also judicial outcomes under proportionality reasoning.

UCL footer

Visit

  • Bloomsbury Theatre and Studio
  • Library, Museums and Collections
  • UCL Maps
  • UCL Shop
  • Contact UCL

Students

  • Accommodation
  • Current Students
  • Moodle
  • Students' Union

Staff

  • Inside UCL
  • Staff Intranet
  • Work at UCL
  • Human Resources
UCL Logo

University College London

Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT

Telephone: +44 (0) 20 7679 2000

UCL social media menu

  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Youtube
  • Link to TikTok
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Bluesky
  • Link to Threads
  • Link to Soundcloud
Here, it can happen.
Back to top

Essential

  • Disclaimer
  • Freedom of Information
  • Accessibility
  • Cookies
  • Privacy
  • Slavery statement
  • Log in

© 2026 UCL