Domestic law in international investment arbitration
01 June 2017, 5:00 pm–7:00 pm
Event Information
Open to
- All
Organiser
-
UCL Laws and the UCL Workshop Series on Investment Law and Policy (ILAP)
Location
-
UCL South Wing Garwood LT, Wilkins Building, Gower Street, London WC1H 6BT
Domestic Law in International Investment Arbitration (OUP 2017)
by Dr Jarrod Hepburn
A book launch and panel discussion co-organised by UCL Laws and the UCL Workshop Series on Investment Law and Policy (ILAP), in conjunction with Investment Arbitration Reporter.
Chair
Lauge Poulsen (University College London)
Speakers
Jarrod Hepburn (Melbourne Law School and Investment Arbitration Reporter)
Martins Paparinskis (University College London)
Alison Macdonald (Matrix Chambers)
Dan Sarooshi (Essex Court Chambers and University of Oxford)
About the book
Although domestic law plays an important role in investment treaty arbitration, this issue is little discussed or analysed. When should investment treaty tribunals engage with domestic law? How should investment treaty tribunals resolve matters of domestic law? These questions have significant ramifications for both the legitimacy of the investment treaty system and the arbitral mandate of the tribunal members. Drawing on case law, international law principles, and comparative analysis, this book addresses these important issues.
Part I of the book examines three areas of investment law-the ‘fair and equitable treatment’ standard, expropriation, and remedies-in which the role of domestic law has so far been under-appreciated. It argues that tribunals are justified in drawing on domestic law as a relevant factor in their rulings on these three issues. Part II of the book examines how questions of domestic law should be resolved in investment arbitration. It proposes a normative framework for use by tribunals in ascertaining the contents of the domestic law to be applied. It then considers counter-arguments, exemptions, and exceptions to applying this framework, and it evaluates how tribunals have ruled on questions of domestic law to date.
Investment treaty arbitration has endured much criticism in recent times, partly over fears of its encroachment on sovereignty. The book ultimately contends that closer attention by tribunals to one of the principal expressions of a state’s sovereignty-the elaboration of its domestic law-will reduce criticism of the field.
Queries
Please email the UCL Laws events team at laws-events@ucl.ac.uk