Gaps in pupil attainment still exist, despite government overhaul of secondary education
11 June 2019
The choice of school may not also be as important in accounting for variations in pupils’ academic attainment since the early 2000s, research suggests.
UCL Institute of Education (IOE) and the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) lead the Nuffield Foundation-funded study, examining the role that schools play in pupils’ education.
Researchers looked at data from around 3,000 secondary schools in England between 2003 and 2016 and compared teachers’ experiences with those of employees elsewhere.
Co-author David Wilkinson (IOE) said: “Following a huge overhaul in state-funded education in the last decade or so, the proportion of variance in pupil attainment accounted for by schools has remained largely unchanged over that period, at around 10%.
“Overall, while some school-led initiatives may have a part to play in attainment levels, it is likely that parental investments in children’s education and early years interventions could have significantly more influence on pupil attainment.”
IOE Professor Alex Bryson, co-author of the report, added: “This means that, although schools are clearly important for improving pupil attainment, attending a ‘good’ school only adds a small amount more value than attending a ‘bad’ school.”
The most effective and high-performing schools were those that were more likely to have rigorous hiring practices and employee participation schemes, according to the researchers. By contrast, increased use of performance-related pay and performance monitoring, which matter in other sectors, were ineffective in schools.
Professor Bryson said: “We found that teachers express greater job satisfaction than employees in other workplaces but they also expressed greater organisational commitment.
“Job-related stress and anxiety were no more prevalent among school employees than among employees elsewhere. Investing in school employees’ job quality is therefore a ‘win-win’ for employees and employers because it is strongly associated with both employee wellbeing and to improvements in school performance.”
The authors also found that academy schools typically employ more classroom teachers with leadership roles (middle leaders) than other schools. While having more middle leaders is associated with better school performance in Single Academy Trusts, no statistically significant association was found for schools which form part of Multi-Academy Trusts (MATs).
Report co-author Lucy Stokes (NIESR) said: “The extent to which academy status has led to genuine gains in autonomy has previously been questioned, particularly for schools which form part of MATs. Our findings point to an important role for autonomy in determining whether schools are able to fully reap the benefits from devolving leadership responsibilities to teachers.”
The researchers say the findings are crucial for policymakers, governing boards and executive leaders who have increasing autonomy over managerial decisions, not only in academies, but across the whole school sector.
Josh Hillman, Director of Education at the Nuffield Foundation, said: “This research provides hard-edged evidence that by investing in their workforce, schools can improve both staff well-being and school performance. This finding is particularly timely given the government’s renewed focus on teacher recruitment and retention.”
- Read the full report
- View David Wilkinson’s research profile
- View Alex Bryson’s research profile
- Department of Social Science
- National Institute for Economic and Social Research
- Nuffield Foundation