A fragment of a short story: Rambling around Central Station. An extract.by Dutch writer ##Geert Mak The story tells of a night and a day in Amsterdam. The first-person narrator is wandering on a rainy day with his homeless companion along the streets of the seedier part of Amsterdam. The extract: They arrive at the open air Albert Cuyp market just as the market stall holders are closing up for the day. Read the text through first before answering the questions.
Questions
ConclusionWhen we were discussing this text our concern was not so much with whether the information about Amsterdam was true or not. Only when you talk about definite verifiable facts can you talk about whether or not something is true. We can assume that the author really did observe what he described. Yet, the way he represented the market was by filtering out any other things he might have observed at the market at the same time. Maybe he even was watching from one of the ‘pleasant cafés’ near the market full of well-dressed and contented people who had just finished a day at work in their well-paid job. The point is that through the way the author represented the Albert Cuyp market, he created a way of thinking about that market which we, due to our previous experience with texts and films about poverty and slums, immediately recognised and latched on to. And when he started to use language, which had these associations, we as readers became swept along in that particular way of thinking about poverty and homelessness, or as you could also say: we were thinking in the discourse of poverty and homelessness. There are other ways of thinking about the events that the author witnessed. In fact, in the first sentence he is hinting at a different interpretation of these events by saying: ‘even without money though, it’s possible to keep yourself reasonably afloat in this city’. This could have been the start of a description emphasising the resourcefulness of homeless people. In the latter case the author would have created a way of talking that would have reminded us of images of strengths and inventiveness. In some way, this is also what we can pick up in the description of a ‘covert exchange market’, which was starting up. But in this particular fragment the discourse (that particular way of thinking and talking about a subject) of resourcefulness is not dominant. Instead, once the film-like scene has been set for a slum, it is only too easy to get swept along with that view without allowing other interpretations to disturb this ‘discourse of poverty'. And it is these discourses, which give us an insight into which different cultural and social values are inherent in a text, whether this text is a written text, a visual image, a song or even a event. |
|