Skip to site navigation

Letter to the Times: Should the Law on Royal Succession be Changed?

17 October 2011

Sir, The proposed changes to the rules for the royal succession (“Will and Kate’s first daughter would take the throne under plans to reform succession”, Oct 13) are welcome but do they go far enough?

Removing the bar on marriage to Roman Catholics is a distinction without a difference. Catholics will still be unable to succeed unless able to “join in communion with” the Church of England — a requirement which equally bans other Christians in the same position and all non-Christians. That rule, devised during the very different geopolitics of the 1680s, is no longer defensible, above all in our more diverse society. Catholics in Canada and Australia might also wonder why the exclusion should continue.

The Church of England may argue that wider change would threaten establishment — in a situation where the Church is already effectively autonomous. But sovereigns might in any case choose to remain in communion and, if not, to continue to express support as they would for other religious bodies. Should not the future of the Church of England be in its own hands rather than preserved by antiquated rules discriminating against others?

R. M. Morris
Honorary Senior Research Associate

More information

Join the Debate

Blog

Gerrymandering for democracy: An impossible goal?

Fri, 04 Sep 2015 09:00:15 +0000

In a recent report by Mathew Lawrence and Sarah Birch the Institute for Public Policy Research has made several proposals for improving the quality of British democracy. One of them involves politicising the traditionally fiercely independent and neutral Boundary Commissions, by requiring them to gerrymander constituency boundaries to produce fewer safe and more marginal seats. […]

Read more...

The Lords’ declining reputation: The evidence

Wed, 02 Sep 2015 11:00:43 +0000

This week the House of Lords has been in the news for all the wrong reasons – with widespread criticism of David Cameron’s latest round of appointments, which have seen the already oversized chamber grow further still. Such negative stories have become common since Cameron became Prime Minister. Meg Russell reports on updated research about […]

Read more...

Is David Cameron actually seeking to destroy the Lords?

Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:00:58 +0000

Yesterday’s new peerage appointments attracted almost universal criticism for further adding to the inexorable growth in size of the House of Lords under David Cameron. But could the gradual erosion of the Lords’ reputation actually benefit the government by weakening parliament? Might it even be a deliberate plan? And – given that the Prime Minister […]

Read more...
Mailing List

Connect with us

RSSFlickr

Footer menu