::::::::::::::::::::
INTRANET
::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::
RETURN TO MODULE 5 ::
Module 5: Text 1
Bearman, David: The Implications of Armstrong v. Executive
of the President for the Archival Management of Electronic Records
::
Metadata for
text base entry
::
Bibliographic
and contextual details
::
Use of the text
within e-TERM
::
Applying
the text to support the module
::
Applying
the text to support a second or subsequent module
::
Additional
study materials
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Metadata for text base entry
e-TERM reference*
|
TPC2
|
Version no.*
|
1
|
Version date*
|
2001-09-20
|
Contributor*
|
Cain, Piers
|
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: RETURN TO TOP ::
Bibliographic and contextual details
Author/s*
|
Bearman, David
|
Title*
|
The Implications of Armstrong v. Executive of the President
for the Archival Management of Electronic Records
|
Print availability
|
American Archivist 56 (1993), 674-689
|
Electronic availability
|
-
|
Copyright
|
© The Society of American Archivists, 1993
|
Introduction
|
This article reviews the arguments presented by both sides
in the lawsuit Armstrong v. The Executive Office of the
President in the United States, which concerned the electronic
mail created by the Reagan and elder Bush White House on the
IBM PROFS system. It discusses the Functional Requirement
for Recordkeeping Systems to demonstrate how they have practical
relevance to records policy issues.
Bearman argues that the US courts confirmed mainstream archival
theory; that it is necessary to preserve the structural and
contextual data as well as the content of an electronic message
to preserve its 'recordness'. The Armstrong case was important
for the archival profession in America, but it had wider resonance
because it showed that electronic records management has public
policy implications as well as technical ramifications.
David Bearman is the President of Archives and Museum Informatics,
an independent consultancy firm that advises cultural institutions
in the electronic world. He previously worked as an archivist
with the Smithsonian Institute in Washington.
|
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: RETURN TO TOP ::
Use of the text within e-TERM
Relevance
|
This article could be used as a case study, but in this exercise
the student should concentrate on the policy aspects.
|
Concepts*
|
Record
Record System
Recordkeeping System
Evidence
Functional Requirements
|
Cases
|
-
|
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: RETURN TO TOP ::
Applying the text to support the module
Module no.*
|
5
|
Role
|
-
|
Contribution to learning objectives*
|
Study of this text will contribute to the following learning
objectives:
5.6
|
To be able to argue convincingly for the archivist
to take a pro-active role in a modern administration
|
5.7
|
To demonstrate understanding of the roles that information
managers, archivists and other parties must play in
the development and implementation of the policy (the
"field of influence")
|
5.10
|
To be able to demonstrate understanding of the difference
between information and records as well as between the
information systems associated with them
|
5.11
|
To demonstrate the ability to integrate the lessons
of previous modules into a policy for electronic records
management
|
5.13
|
To demonstrate the ability to understand the requirements
which the introduction and use of automated systems
imposes on recordkeeping and to synthesise these into
the role of the archivist
|
5.14
|
To show appreciation of the risks which your own organisation
runs if electronic recordkeeping requirements are not
met and to demonstrate ability to position your own
organisation favourably in the transfer from paper to
digital systems
|
|
Preliminary reading
|
-
|
Reading help
|
Concentrate on pp 678-689. Although this article contains
material of interest mainly to archivist operating in the
American context, there is much of relevance to any practicing
archivist or records manager.
|
Discussion
|
In this article Bearman argues that the National Archivist
made some serious policy errors because he did not, at that
time, have the intellectual framework needed to think about
a new use of technology in the office - electronic mail. Bearman
shows that much turned on two issues: 1) Was the White House
email system being used for substantive business transactions?
2) Was the Archivist of the United States taking appropriate
action?
What are the policy issues identified by Bearman?
Which of these are relevant to a national archives and which
are relevant to any archivist or records manager?
Why is Bearman's concept of a recordkeeping system important
when thinking about records policy?
What are the policy recommendations made by Bearman?
Which continue to be relevant today?
|
Assignment*
|
Bearman's article was written when email was still relatively
new and there was considerable confusion over whether email
should be considered a record. Have these issues been solved?
Consider, for example email attachments. What are the emerging
technology applications of today that might create similar
confusion and why?
|
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: RETURN TO TOP ::
Applying the text to support a
second or subsequent module
-
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: RETURN TO TOP ::
Additional study material
Further reading
|
-
|
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: RETURN TO TOP ::
This page was last updated on 8 March 2002
|