::::::::::::::::::::
INTRANET
::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::
RETURN TO MODULE 0-1 ::
Module 0-1: Text 2
Cox, Richard: The Record: Is It Evolving?
::
Metadata for
text base entry
::
Bibliographic
and contextual details
::
Use of the text
within e-TERM
::
Applying
the text to support the module
::
Applying
the text to support a second or subsequent module
::
Additional
study materials
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Metadata for text base entry
e-TERM reference*
|
TPC8
|
Version no.*
|
2
|
Version date*
|
2002-05-14
|
Contributor*
|
Cain, Piers; revised Yeo, Geoffrey
|
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: RETURN TO TOP ::
Bibliographic and contextual details
Author/s*
|
Cox, Richard
|
Title*
|
'The Record: Is It Evolving?'
|
Print availability
|
The Records & Retrieval Report, 10:3 (March 1994):
1-16
|
Electronic availability
|
|
Copyright
|
©1994 Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
|
Introduction
|
Richard Cox explains why we need to think carefully about
how a record is defined and situates this thinking in the
context of the historical development of the record, traditional
archival theory, and changes in technology and working practices.
He also introduces functional recordkeeping requirements developed
by the ground breaking University of Pittsburgh research project.
Richard Cox is an Associate Professor in Library and Information
Science at the University of Pittsburgh. Previously he worked
at the New York State Archives and Records Administration,
Alabama Department of Archives and History, the City of Baltimore,
and the Maryland Historical Society. He has written extensively
on the history of archival science and recordkeeping, the
management of electronic records, and the public awareness
of archives and records in the modern information age.
|
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: RETURN TO TOP ::
Use of the text within e-TERM
Relevance
|
-
|
Concepts*
|
Archives
Data
Documents
Evidence
Functional Requirements
Information
Record
Record System
Record keeping System
Technopoly
|
Cases
|
-
|
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: RETURN TO TOP ::
Applying the text to support the module
Module no.*
|
0.1
|
Role
|
-
|
Contribution to learning objectives*
|
Study of this text will contribute to the following learning
objectives:
0-1.1
|
To demonstrate understanding of the aims and objectives
of recordkeeping
|
0-1.2
|
To demonstrate understanding of the main recordkeeping
concepts and terminology
|
0-1.3
|
To demonstrate understanding of the main quality attributes
of a record
|
0-1.5
|
To articulate the differences between a record and
non-record information
|
0-1.6
|
To demonstrate appreciation of how recordkeeping can
contribute to the integrity, accountability and performance
of the organisation
|
0-1.7
|
To demonstrate vision regarding the opportunities offered
by ICT for records and recordkeeping, both in the short
term and long term
|
0-1.8
|
To demonstrate appreciation of and ability to articulate
societal and organisational responsibilities with regard
to recordkeeping.
|
|
Preliminary reading
|
-
|
Reading help
|
Cox is writing for an American audience where the archival
tradition evolved differently from the European model. This
is particularly evident in the discussion in the section on
'The rediscovery of Records as Evidence' (pp 9-12). One of
the interesting consequences of the 'information age' has
been the emergence of a common view of many aspects of archival
theory in many parts of the world.
|
Discussion
|
Cox starts by describing the historical development of the
record as a cultural construct. How does this historical overview
add to our understanding of the present day purpose and use
of records?
What is the difference between data and information?
What is the difference between records and documents?
Is an email message data, or information or a record?
Would you consider a snapshot of a government web site to
be a record according to the criteria outlined in this article?
Does a traditional paper recordkeeping system have the same
attributes as an electronic recordkeeping system?
|
Assignment
|
Why do people or organisations keep records and has the widespread
use of information technology changed the reasons why they
do this?
|
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: RETURN TO TOP ::
Applying the text to support a
second or subsequent module
-
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: RETURN TO TOP ::
Additional study material
Further reading
|
McKemmish, Sue, 'Recordkeeping, Accountability and Continuity:
The Australian Reality' in McKemmish, Sue and Upward, Frank
(eds.), Archival Documents, Monash Occasional Papers
in Librarianship, Recordkeeping and Bibliography, No. 3, Ancora
Press, Melbourne, Australia, 1993, 9-26.
|
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: RETURN TO TOP ::
This page was last updated on 14 May 2002
|