Skip to site navigation

Dr James Melton


Dr James Melton

  • Position: Senior Lecturer in British and Comparative Politics
  • Room:3.01
  • Building: 29-30 Tavistock Square
  • Telephone:0207 679 4991
  • Email:

James Melton joined UCL in 2012. His expertise in cross-national constitution making strengthens the comparative aspect of the Constitution Unit’s research. James uses this expertise to understand the effect of constitutional text on economic, political, and social development. He contributes a regular column to the Monitor on “Worldwide Constitutional Developments” and feeds into the comparative dimensions of the Unit's research projects.

James's interest in comparative constitutional design stems from his involvement with the Comparative Constitutions Project (CCP). The CCP is an effort to investigate the sources and consequences of constitutional choices. Towards this end, James has worked with Zachary Elkins (Associate Professor, University of Texas at Austin) and Tom Ginsburg (Professor, University of Chicago Law School) since 2005 to catalogue the contents of all constitutions written in independent states since 1789. Through his involvement with the CCP, James has read dozens of constitutions, providing him with substantial knowledge of constitutions in a wide variety of countries.

Prior to his appointment at UCL, James was an Assistant Professor (2009-2012) at the IMT Institute for Advanced Studies in Lucca, Italy, and earned a Ph.D. (2009) from the Department of Political Science at the University of Illinois. He also holds an M.A. from the Department of Political Science at the University of Illinois and a B.A. from the Department of Political Science at Illinois Wesleyan University. James is formally trained in comparative politics with an emphasis on economic, political, and social development. He also has extensive training in political science research methods.

Find out more about James Melton's research here

James Melton's research focuses on comparative constitutional design. His research explores the origins, stability, and enforcement of formal constitutional texts. He is particularly interested in whether and how the text of countries’ constitutions contributes to their economic, political, and social development.

James is perhaps best known for The Endurance of National Constitutions, which he co-authored with Zachary Elkins and Tom Ginsburg. The book argues that the design of constitutions affects their endurance, and presents both cross-national and case study evidence that flexible, inclusive, and specific constitutions live longer. The book won an award from the Comparative Democratization section of the American Political Science Association (APSA) in 2010 and an honorable mention for the William H. Riker award in 2011 from APSA's Political Economy section.

James has also written on occupation constitutions, executive term limits, the interpretability of constitutions, and the relationship between constitutional rights and countries’ rights practices. One of the consistent findings in this work is that the text of the constitution matters: a finding that challenges more than 200 years of scholarship which saw constitutions as mere parchment barriers. These works have appeared in outlets like the British Journal of Political Science, the NYU Law Review, and the William and Mary Law Review.

Find out more about James Melton's research here



Elkins, Zachary, Tom Ginsburg, and James Melton. The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Oct 2009)

Book Chapters

Ginsburg, Tom, Zachary Elkins, and James Melton. 2012. “Do Executive Term Limits Cause Constitutional Crises?” Comparative Constitutional Design. Ed. Tom Ginsburg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 350-380.

Journal Articles

Melton, James, Zachary Elkins, and Tom Ginsburg. 2013. “On the Interpretability of Law: Lessons from the Decoding of National Constitutions.” British Journal of Political Science. 43.2: 399-423. 

Elkins, Zachary, Tom Ginsburg, and James Melton. 2012. “Comments on Law and Versteeg, The Declining Influence of the U.S. Constitution.” NYU Law Review. 87.6: 2088-2101. 

Ginsburg, Tom, James Melton, and Zachary Elkins. 2011. “On the Evasion of Executive Term Limits.” William & Mary Law Review. 52.6: 1807-1872. 

Elkins, Zachary, Tom Ginsburg, and James Melton. 2008. “Baghdad, Tokyo, Kabul,…: Constitution Making in Occupied States.” William & Mary Law Review. 49: 1139-1178. 

Other Publications and Reports

Elkins, Zachary, Tom Ginsburg, and James Melton. 2013. “U.S. Gun Rights Are Truly American Exceptionalism.” Bloomberg View. 

Elkins, Zachary, Tom Ginsburg, and James Melton. 2012. A Review of Iceland’s Draft Constitution.” .

Working Papers

Do Constitutions Matter?: The Relationship between De Jure and De Facto Human Rights Protection.

The Content of Authoritarian Constitutions. - with Zachary Elkins and Tom Ginsburg

Does De Jure Judicial Independence Really Matter?: A Reevaluation of Explanations for Judicial Independence. - with Tom Ginsburg

Find out more about James Melton's research here

James is responsible for teaching the following modules in the department:

POLS 6020 – Designing Political Institutions for the Developing World (Undergraduate Module)

POLS 6011 – Introduction to Comparative Politics (Undergraduate Module)

Prior to joining UCL, James taught courses on political development, comparative constitutional design, comparative constitutional law, and research methods.

Find out more about James Melton's research here


New Data Available from the Comparative Constitutions Project

Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:05:27 +0000

Last week the Comparative Constitutions Project (CCP) released two new data sets. These new data are available for download here. The first data set is an update to the CCP’s Chronology of Constitutional Events. In addition to making a number of minor changes to previously released chronology data, we added constitutional events that occurred from […]


Comparing the 1971, 2012, and 2013 Egyptian Constitutions

Thu, 12 Dec 2013 10:36:15 +0000

The Comparative Constitutions Project has developed a new tool that allows one to compare the 1971, 2012, and 2013 Egyptian constitutions:  We have assigned the topics from the Constitute site to the texts of those three constitutions, which allows one to select a topic and see how each of the three constitutions addresses it.  If […]


Directly Querying the Constitute Data

Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:00:56 +0000

Thank you to all who attended my seminar today.  As promised, I am going to provide the code that I used to query the data underlying the Constitute site. To start, you will need to know how to write a SPARQL query.  There are good resources online to teach you how to write such queries […]



More people

Connect with us

The Constitution Unit

Page last modified on 22 sep 14 17:17

Footer menu