Skip to site navigation

Press Release: No surprises in UK government legal advice on Scottish independence, says Constitution Unit

11 February 2013

Commenting on the legal advice published today by the UK government, the Director of UCL’s Constitution Unit Prof Robert Hazell said:

“This legal advice comes as no surprise. We have been saying for the last 10 years that an independent Scotland would have to apply to re-join the EU and other international bodies. That should not cause Scotland too much difficulty, because Scotland easily meets the admission criteria. But in the eyes of the world the rest of the UK will be the ‘continuing state’. That is what the international law precedents suggest; and the rest of the world will want to recognise the rUK as the continuing state, for reasons of predictability and stability”.

“We reached this conclusion on the basis of 18 months’ research” Prof Hazell continued. “And because of its importance, we published that chapter of our book in draft and tested it at an expert seminar in Edinburgh. So we are very pleased that two such distinguished experts as Prof James Crawford and Prof Alan Boyle have come to the same conclusion. It is also the view of the experts who have given evidence to the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee on this point”.

Notes for Editors

Prof Hazell is available for interview on Monday afternoon, tel 020 7679 4977 or email ben.webb@ucl.ac.uk

The Constitution Unit conducted an 18 month research project into the legal and constitutional path which Scotland would need to follow to achieve independence. The conclusions were published in J Murkens and P Jones: Scottish Independence – A Practical Guide (Edinburgh University Press, 2002).

As part of that project the Unit held a seminar in Edinburgh with a group of experts in European and international law. The experts supported the Unit’s conclusion that an independent Scotland would have to apply to re-join the EU and other international bodies.

Prof Hazell and Dr Jo Murkens recently gave evidence on this point to the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee’s inquiry into the Foreign Policy Implications of a separate Scotland. Their evidence was given on 16 October, and can be seen at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmfaff/uc643-i/uc64301.htm

Join the Debate

Blog

News

Can Scotland trust Westminster to transfer enough powers to seal it for a No result?

Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:00:50 +0000

Brian Walker explores whether the pro-Union parties can offer enough devolution to persuade voters Scotland will be given priority if they vote No. On September 18 voters in Scotland will take a momentous decision based on two sets of uncertainty: on independence which is on the ballot paper and on more devolution which is not. A recent […]

Read more...

Codifying the UK constitution: an exercise in reform or preservation?

Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:00:48 +0000

If the UK gets a written constitution, will it seek simply to codify the current constitutional arrangement or will it present an opportunity for more fundamental changes? In light of a recent PCRC report assessing the desirability of a written constitution, Daniel Helen looks at recent codification proposals and considers the reforms they put forward. Behind the title […]

Read more...

Defining the office of Prime Minister

Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:00:36 +0000

The British Prime Minister has extensive and growing powers, yet the role is ill-defined in UK constitutional documents. Graham Allen argues in favour of clarifying the role of the Prime Minister. He also suggests it should become a directly elected office, to ensure that it is properly answerable to the UK public. It is symptomatic of the British […]

Read more...
Mailing List

Connect with us

RSSFlickr

Footer menu