Skip to site navigation

Press release: Diamond Jubilee is a tribute to self-sacrifices required by the Monarchy

1 June 2012

In TV interviews to mark the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee, the Director of the Constitution Unit Prof Robert Hazell has been commenting on the Queen’s very strong sense of public duty, and reflecting on the self-sacrifice required by the Monarch and those in line of succession to the throne.

HM Queen Elizabeth II

“We all pay tribute to the Queen’s lifelong devotion to public service, and the tireless way she has represented and served the nation for 60 years” Prof Hazell said. “During the celebrations it is worth just pausing and recognising the demands we make of the Monarchy. We take the Monarchy for granted, but it does require some extraordinary sacrifices on their part”.

First is the requirement of lifelong service. The Queen is 86, and has been working as Monarch for 60 years, with no prospect of retirement. She maintains a punishing work programme, including official visits not just around the UK, but to the overseas countries of which she is also head of state. And Prince Charles has spent the whole of his adult life waiting and preparing for a role on which he has yet to embark. That too requires lifelong commitment.

Second is the loss of freedom. The Queen, Prince Charles and Prince William have to abandon freedoms which we take for granted. Freedom of privacy and family life; freedom of expression; freedom to travel where we like; free choice of careers; freedom of religion; freedom to marry whom we like. For the Royal family these basic human rights are all curtailed. They are seen to lead privileged lives in material terms; but they pay a heavy price for that privilege.

The loss of freedoms can be exemplified as follows:

  • Right to privacy: the hacking of Prince William and Prince Harry’s phones; speculation about whether William and Kate will have a baby.
  • Freedom of expression: the scrupulous neutrality required of the Queen and senior Royals on all political matters.
  • Freedom to travel: visits overseas can only be taken with the advice and approval of the Foreign Office.
  • Choice of careers: for Prince Charles and Prince William these are effectively limited to military and charitable and good works.
  • Freedom of religion: the Monarch must be in communion with the Church of England, and those in the line of succession cannot themselves be or be married to a Catholic (the latter restriction is due to be removed with planned changes to the law on succession).
  • Freedom to marry: requires consent under the Royal Marriages Act, on the advice of the government.

Join the Debate

Blog

The Nineteenth Amendment is a constitutional milestone in Sri Lanka’s ongoing political development

Thu, 21 May 2015 10:00:51 +0000

At the end of April, the Sri Lankan President’s 100-day programme of governance reforms culminated with the passing of the Nineteenth Amendment to reduce the powers of the presidency. Asanga Welikala reviews the progress that has been made since January, and argues that despite difficulties and necessary compromises, the Amendment represents a change for the […]

Read more...

Scotland has voted for the union and for distinctiveness. Delivering both could present acute challenges

Tue, 19 May 2015 09:00:45 +0000

After a dramatic referendum and UK general election, the Scottish remain divided on both independence and on whether to increase tax and public spending, while the English are becoming increasingly vocal in the devolution debate. Jim Gallagher considers the possibilities of a constitutional relationship that will satisfy Scottish aspirations and also be acceptable to the UK as […]

Read more...

Will plans for a British bill of rights be reduced to a bill for England only?

Fri, 15 May 2015 09:00:48 +0000

Opposition from Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales could pose a serious challenge to Conservative plans to scrap the Human Rights Act. Robert Hazell and Bob Morris write that if the new government tries to push ahead regardless, it may only be able to create an English bill of rights, with potentially negative consequences for the […]

Read more...
Mailing List

Connect with us

RSSFlickr

Footer menu