Registered Office University College London, Institute of Archaeology, 31-34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY




Adult Woman
Figure 1. The adult woman (40 - 60 years old) who was holding her left and right lateral incisors in her left and right hands respectively.
          In Past 33 ('Life on the Floor') we reported on the excavation of preserved roundhouse floors within a deep-stratified Late Bronze Age-Early Iron Age settlement mound at Cladh Hallan on the island of South Uist in the Outer Hebrides. This summer we finished digging the northern three houses within a north-south terrace and were able to investigate the activities which preceded and accompanied their initial construction. All three were built together as a unit, all facing east, and had separate life-histories thereafter: the southern house went out of use and the northern house was re-floored twice whilst the central house was rebuilt another seven times over a period of more than half a millennium. Each rebuilding required the recentering of the house on a fractionally different locus so that continuity of location was achieved whilst the precise positioning was never the same as before. Ground plans of each house were also modified with each rebuilding, although the direction of the doorway never changed.
          In previous seasons we had found a number of sacrificial dog and sheep burials (dated to 900-750 BC) underneath the successive Early Iron Age floors of the middle roundhouse. This year we found human skeletons beneath all three houses. The first to be found was a baby, buried lying on its front below the third floor of the north house. Lower down, two adults (a man and a woman both aged over 40) had been buried in crouched positions beneath the first floor of the north house. Under the first floor of the middle house we found another crouched burial, of a 12-year-old, possibly a girl. The burial under the south house was that of a rotted 3- year-old child, dead long enough for all but its torso to become disarticulated. Since these houses form just one end of a row, it is probable that the community needed some 7 or 8 corpses in total, all at once, for these foundation offerings to be buried before the floors were laid. The rotted child and the adult male in the north house were dead some time before burial and the woman may have been dead long enough for her teeth to be extracted with ease. Eerily, she was buried holding her upper lateral incisors in each hand. The man, who had also lost all the teeth in his upper jaw (the molars lost many years before and the front teeth probably falling out after death but prior to burial), had been provided with someone else's mandible. Otherwise, the remainder of his bones were present, presumably held in place by a tightly wrapped shroud which had not covered his face. His tightly flexed posture is reminiscent of a 'mummy bundle' and raises the possibility that the corpse was retained for months if not years before burial beneath the new house.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The row of Late Bronze Age houses at Cladh Hallan in their earliest phases. The double round house in the northeast was built at the end of the sequence in the Early Iron Age.

          Evidence for the normal funerary rite of the Late Bronze Age came from outside the door of the north house. A small stone-laid cremation pyre contained the burnt bones of children. This stone platform was built against an unusual double pit within which were the broken bones of an adult's knee. Close to this feature, in a later layer, we found a gold-plated bronze penannular 'hair ring'. Human skull fragments came from one of the three large pits dug in front of each roundhouse prior to building. Discovery of the human burials was particularly exciting because we had previously predicted their locations within the northeast corners of each house. Building on Andrew Fitzpatrick's diurnal model of the sunwise arrangement of roundhouse space, we had proposed that the life cycle from birth to death was similarly represented by the circularity of the house - with birth symbolised in the southeast and death in the northeast. All but one burial fitted the pattern: the woman with her teeth in her hands was buried on the south side of the northern house (though at least she faced west, adhering to the sunwise directionality of movement exhibited by the human and animal burials).
          Cladh Hallan's central roundhouse is also associated with a dump of clay mould fragments for making bronze swords, spears and ornaments. Most of these lay within a 'floor' layer which had accumulated outside the door, with other fragments lying on the floor inside the house. This central house was the largest of the three whereas the south house was the smallest and the most impoverished. All three appear to have been dwellings, at least in their earliest phases, and yet each differs markedly in architecture and associated artefactual assemblage.
          The symbolic emphasis on the house, as seen in brochs and the other architecturally elaborate Iron Age houses of the Outer Hebrides and other parts of the Scottish highlands and islands may well have its origins in Late Bronze Age sites like Cladh Hallan. The central house had its wall cores increased in thickness to 3m, even though their original height was not greater than 0.5m. Elsewhere in the British Isles, the burials of humans and animals and the deposition of metalworking debris are confined to the outskirts and edges of settlements. Here in these unenclosed settlements it was the house which was the locus of everyday life in all its forms, social, economic and symbolic.

Mike Parker Pearson
Sheffield University

Peter Marshall
English Heritage

Jacqui Mulville
King Alfred's College, Winchester

Helen Smith
Bournemouth University



Neolithic enclosure
Figure 1. Neolithic enclosure at Ottstedt am Berge, Thuringia, Germany, 25 July 1998. (Infrared flase colour slide film. Photo © Otto Braasch.)

        Aerial photography, reconnaissance, mapping and understanding the landscape have been carried out as part of aerial survey for many years in Britain and since the ending of the Cold War (1989-1990) aerial survey has expanded enormously throughout out Europe. Normally aerial archaeologists measure their success in the number of new sites recorded in dramatically dry summers but the latest annus mirabilis is being measured in the number of meetings, conferences, workshops and training sessions which have taken place (from November 2000 to November 2001) with a NATO grant, EU Culture 2000 grant and contributions from participating institutions across Europe including English Heritage and the British Academy. These events have been part of a year long project, Conservation through Aerial Archaeology, which has been very successful in developing a network of interested practitioners as well as raising the profile aerial survey for archaeology. Thus it is an appropriate time to prepare this short piece, which is intended to highlight some of the prehistoric discoveries made across Europe in recent years.
        In Britain aerial survey in England, Scotland and Wales combines reconnaissance and mapping and recently there was a review (commissioned by the British Academy, 2001) of aerial photography for archaeology which highlighted the cost-effectiveness of the approach but also recommended further investment and integration of the technique within an agreed strategy for aerial survey in Britain.
        At least there is a structure for archaeological aerial survey in Britain but on the continent the situation is much less coherent and reliant on individuals (see Bewley and Raczkowski 2002) and discoveries are therefore as much to do with serendipity as they are part of an integrated research design.

        Aerial reconnaissance in northern England in 2001 found good conditions in Yorkshire, Lincolnshire and Nottinghamshire and the notable discoveries were a long barrow near Louth, Lincolnshire (see Jones 1998 for background); pit alignments and other structures in the general vicinity of the "ritual landscapes" near Ripon, North Yorkshire; new square barrows on the Yorkshire Wolds (see Stoertz 1997 for background) and numerous late prehistoric and Romano-British sites in the region (Pete Horne and Dave MacLeod pers. comm.). In southern England the conditions were mixed with a number of discoveries in the Cotswolds of enclosures which may be late prehistoric (Damian Grady pers. comm.) but this is an area which will be studied as part of a National Mapping Programme project (Bewley 2001), beginning in April 2002.
        As already mentioned the mapping projects in Britain discover, interpret and record new sites every day and in England the National Mapping Programme (organised and funded by English Heritage) has begun to transform our understanding of prehistoric settlement in many areas (especially places like Cornwall). Individual sites are recorded for the first time and the most recent notable examples are a long barrow and a causewayed enclosure in Norfolk (see article in this issue), and this after the latest publication on the subject (Oswald, Dyer and Barber 2001). There have been many discoveries on the chalk in southern England, some in the Avebury area which have been published (Bewley et al. 1996) and others (the oval (neolithic) enclosure at Beckhampton) which led to excavations by a team from Southampton University, which in turn led to the confirmation that Stukeley was right and Avebury did have a western (Beckhampton) avenue.
        Recent mapping of the Knowlton area in Dorset (for the report on the excavations of the South Henge by Bournemouth University) has added new information, including at least four possible square barrows, a type of site not previously recorded in this region (Cathy Stoertz pers. comm). Similarly mapping (as a training exercise for student placements) of the area centred on Liddington Hill, just south of Swindon has provided good evidence of a (ploughed out) enclosure, with similar dimensions to the hillfort at Liddington, on a small promontory on the other side of the valley. Its size, shape and location make this a strong candidate for a hillfort (or defended enclosure) to control access to the valley (Simon Crutchley pers. comm).
        Recently the Stonehenge Word Heritage Site has been re-mapped using aerial photographs, partly for the management plan but mainly in advance of the redevelopments of the roads (A344 closure, dualling and tunnelling of A303 and Winterbourne Stoke bypass). Despite the intensity of survey work in the area, a rash of new enclosures was discovered in the southern portion of the survey (south of Stonehenge itself). These are thought to be possible Bronze Age and/or Iron Age farmsteads (Helen Winton pers. comm.).

Two neolithic enclosures
Figure 2. Two neolithic enclosures with post holes marking linear band ceramic culture houses inside. At the upper right, two parallel ditches point to a third enclosure. Northwest Hungary, 18 June 2000. (High resolution colour slide film. Photo © Otto Braasch.)

        Finally, but still on the chalk, the Lambourn Downs mapping project produced evidence for groupings of banjo enclosures (hitherto only single examples had been known in this area) around the, head of a (now) dry valley with all the funnels of the banjos pointing towards the valley (Helen Winton pers. comm.). The work by Roger Featherstone in the Cherwell valley (Oxfordshire) has now been published (Featherstone and Bewley 2001). This reports the discovery of hundreds of banjo enclosures (in the dry summers of 1995 and 1996) in an area which was not noted for its Iron Age settlement material and which had been difficult to reconnoitre until the United States Air Force closed its airbase at Upper Heyford. This closure was as a consequence of the ending of the Cold War and in Europe there has been a dramatic rise in aerial survey activity since 1990. Much of the recent work has been pulled together in the proceedings of a NATO funded workshop in Poland (Bewley and Raczkowski 2002). It is appropriate to report first of recent work in Germany, where Otto Braasch has led the way in encouraging aerial reconnaissance in the new Germany and in neighbouring states.
        Covering such a large area as Germany, there are always areas which produce results for Otto Braasch, and in particular there have been a number of discoveries of Neolithic sites, causewayed enclosures, long houses, henges and pit alignments (Braasch 1995). Figures 1 and 2 are but two examples of the kind of sites which are being recorded on a regular basis by Otto in most parts of Germany, and he is also working in the Baltic states, Poland, Hungary and Italy (with interests in Romania and Bulgaria!).
A large elongated rectilinear enclosure
Figure 3. A large enlongated rectilinear enclosure, which has parallels with small cursus monuments or large mortuary enclosures in Britain, at Zalté Klasy, district Dunajská, Slovakia. (Photo © I. Kuzma.)
        Our Polish correspondent Wlodek Raczkowski is very excited about seeing neolithic long houses recently at Radojewice, community D Cbrowa, Biskupsia. Several trapezoidal long houses (Breœæ Kujawski type settlement) of early farmers on the Polish Lowland (Kujavia region) were identified. The site was discovered during field walking survey but no-one expected that it covered so large an area (the photograph, Figure 4, shows only part of the settlement). Many pits are also visible. The modern drainage system complicates the interpretation of the long houses and other features. The almost-parallel ditches in the centre of the photograph (Figure 4) are not thought to be part of the drainage pattern and may be the parallel lines of an archaeological feature (perhaps a cursus?). To date this kind of feature has not been recognised in Polish archaeology.

Future applications.
        The scope of aerial survey has grown enormously over the past twenty years and especially in the recording and understanding of industrial and twentieth century buildings. Part of this work is for monitoring and assessing the condition of sites and buildings. Monitoring sites from the air has been applied recently in England after learning from the pioneering work in Wales begun by Chris Musson and now continued by Toby Driver (RCAHMW). A good example of this from England is the hillfort at Idbury in Gloucesterhire (Figure 5); despite being a scheduled monument, the ploughing regime is allowed to continue (under class consent of the 1979 Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act). In this photograph its internal features as well as the ditch and bank are clearly visible, but one has to ask for how much longer? On looking up the record for this site (NMR No. SP 21 NW 2) I noted that it was visited by an OS recorder (none other than Leo Rivet on the 16th May 1956 - by sheer coincidence the day I was born) who records that "The camp is still being ploughed and was under growing crops, but there were faint indications of an entrance on the north side." Little change in protection in 45 years!

Trapezoidal long houses
Figure 4. Trapezoidal long houses. (Breœæ Kujawski type settlement) of early farmers on the Polish Lowland. Photo W Raczkowski July 2000. © IAiE PAN O/Paznañ.)

Idbury hillfort
Figure 5. Idbury hillfort, Gloucestershire. Photo by Damian Grady. NMR © English Heritage. NMR 21246/23. SP 2219/31. 22 June 2001.

        For aerial survey to continue its important and useful role in providing greater understanding and in contributing to the management of the historic environment, it has to develop new techniques and methodologies, but also it must form part of national survey strategies which include reconnaissance, mapping, and follow-up fieldwork.
In these post foot and mouth days (in Britain) the application of aerial survey has never been more appropriate and useful, when so much fieldwork has had to be cancelled or at best postponed. Although this disease was a little local difficulty for archaeology, it was a major disaster for those who live and work in the countryside; fortunately airborne archaeologists were able to continue as were those desk-bound interpreters who make sense of the sites they interpret.
        Training the next generation is a key factor in the survival of the subject and the Culture 2000 grant allowed us to run a training week in Tuscany, Italy, for twenty-two Italian students (in May 2001). During the training week a number of prehistoric sites were recorded (notably a promontory fort just south of Tarquinia) and Otto Braasch has been re- working the famous cropmark landscape areas of Apulia (Bradford 1957) but these results must form the basis of a future report. Let us hope that the beginnings of post-Cold war co-operation can be strengthened, continued and expanded (even into the Middle East (see Bewley and Kennedy 1998) over the next decade.

Robert Bewley

Bewley R. 2001. Understanding England's Historic Landscapes: an aerial perspective. Landscapes. 2(1):74-84.
Bewley R. and D. Kennedy. 1998 An Aerial Survey Contribution to prehistoric archaeology in Jordan. PAST 30:1-3.
Bewley R. and W. Raczkowski. 2002 Aerial Archaeology. Developing Future Practice. NATO Science Series I: Life and Behavioural Sciences 337. Amsterdam.
Bewley R., Cole M., David A., Featherstone R., Payne A., and Small F. 1996. New features within the henge at Avebury, Wiltshire: aerial and geophysical evidence. Antiquity. 70: 639-46.
Braasch O. 1995. 50 Jahre verloren. In Kunow J. (ed.) Luftbildarchäologie in Ost - und Mitteleuropa. Eorschungen zur Archäologie im Land Brandendurg 3, Potsdam. 109-122.
Bradford J.S.P. 1957. Ancient Landscapes. Studies in Field Archaeology. Bell. London.
British Academy 2001. Aerial Survey for Archaeology. Report of a British Academy Working Party 1999.Compiled by Robert Bewley. British Academy, London.
Featherstone R. and R. Bewley. 2001. Recent Aerial Reconnaissance in North Oxfordshire. Oxoniensia. Volume 65:13-26.
Gojda M. 2000 Archeologie Krajiny. Academia. Prague.
Jones D. 1998. Long Barrows and Neolithic Elongated Enclosures in Lincolnshire: An analysis of the Air Photographic Evidence. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 64:83-114.
Oswald A., Dyer C., Barber M. 2001. The Creation of Monuments. English Heritage, Swindon.
Stoertz C. 1997 Ancient Landscapes of the Yorkshire Wolds. RCHME. Swindon.



Plan of the site
Figure 1. Plan of the site

         A possible causewayed enclosure was photographed by Derek Edwards in June 1996 during aerial reconnaissance for the Norfolk Museums Archaeology Service and the RCHME. The site was subsequently recorded during work for the English Heritage National Mapping Programme in September 2001 (Bewley 2001). The enclosure (SMR 36398) is located at TG 07230 41564 within the parish of Salthouse in north-east Norfolk. The monument is approximately circular, with a diameter of 60 metres. The circuit appears to be divided into at least seven separate lengths of ditch, although there is a larger gap to the north where a further two stretches of ditch may be obscured. The enclosure lies at a height of 50 metres OD on a south facing slope. The location overlooks the areas to the East, South and West but is topographically situated slightly downslope from the higher ground to the immediate north.
         The closest recorded Neolithic finds to the enclosure are a reputed assemblage of twenty to thirty polished and part-polished stone axes, said to have been recovered by farmworkers from a field situated approximately 500m to the south east (SMR 6199). A relatively small oblong enclosure, approximately 25m long and 12m wide, is visible as a cropmark 300 metres to the South West of the site. This feature is morphologically similar to enclosures interpreted as a form of Neolithic long mound (Jones, 1998). There are also numerous Bronze Age barrows within the environs of the site, with a dense concentration occupying the heathland to the immediate north of the enclosure.
         This is likely to be the third causewayed enclosure from Norfolk, together with sites at Roughton and Buxton with Lammas (Wade-Martins 1997, 1999; Oswald et al 2001). Another potential site at Hainford has rightfully been dismissed from the class (Oswald et al 2001). All of the Norfolk sites appear to be approximately circular, defined by relatively narrow ditches and pit sections, interspersed with narrow causeways. These enclosures are generally defined by single ditches, however the recently published plot of Roughton (Oswald et al, 2001: fig. 6.7), has identified a second, more ephemeral, inner ditch or feature.
Aerial photograph
Plate 1. Aerial photgraph of the site taken by Derek Edwards on 28th June 1996. (ref TG0741/ADBJ/JFQ10). © Norfolk Museums and Archaeology Service.

        The three possible Norfolk examples are relatively small and have a marked circularity in comparison to many other causewayed enclosure sites in England. This contrast in morphology has caused some to question their date and relationship to other causewayed sites (Ashwin, 1996). While the majority of causewayed enclosures appear to have been created in the fourth millennium BC (Oswald et al, 2001) it has been suggested that the smaller, more circular sites have more in common with hengiform monuments of the later Neolithic and early Bronze Age. At present no excavation has taken place on any of the Norfolk 'causewayed' enclosures and therefore none of these chronological questions can be adequately answered. The smaller dimensions of the Norfolk sites may be a reflection of the size and dispersal of the communities creating, maintaining and using them and it may not be necessary to assume that they occurred later than elsewhere in Britain.
        The spatial relationship between causewayed enclosures and other earlier Neolithic monuments has long been recognised (Oswald et al, 2001), in particular the close positioning of some causewayed enclosures and long barrows. The enclosure at Roughton appears to be flanked by two long barrows. A possible cursus identified along the same alignment to the North (Oswald et al, 2001; fig 6.7), may require further investigation before it is assigned a Neolithic origin. However, the barrows alone attest to the significance of the location at Roughton during the Neolithic. It is possible that a comparable situation is emerging at Salthouse. The small oblong cropmark located near to the new enclosure may represent the remains of a Neolithic barrow. The relationship between these Norfolk causewayed enclosures and long barrows is reminiscent of other British sites and could also be taken to indicate an Early Neolithic date for the construction of these monuments. It is hoped that the work of the Norfolk NMP will help to answer some of these morphological questions and further define the spatial relationships between the causewayed sites and other Neolithic monuments.

Mark Brennand, Henrietta Clare and Sarah Massey
Norfolk National Mapping Programme
Norfolk Landscape Archaeology, Union House, Gressenhall, Dereham, Norfolk, NR20 4DR.

Ashwin, T. 1996. Neolithic and Bronze Age Norfolk. Proceeding of the Prehistoric Society 62, 41-62.
Bewley, B. 2001. Understanding England's Historic Landscapes: an Aerial Perspective. Landscapes volume 2 part 1, 74-84.
Jones, D. 1998. Long barrows and Neolithic elongated enclosures in Lincolnshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 64, 83-114.
Oswald, A., Dyer, C, and Barber, M. 2001. The Creation of Monuments: Neolithic Causewayed Enclosures in the British Isles. Swindon: English Heritage.
Wade-Martins, P. (ed) 1997. Norfolk from the Air I. Dereharn: Norfolk Museums Service.
Wade-Martins, P. (ed). 1999. Norfolk from the Air Volume 2. Dereham: Norfolk Museums Service.



Early Middle Neolithic
Figure 1. The features belonging to the Early Middle Neolithic phase in trench 5. The clay platform can be clearly seen.

         It is always interesting when our discoveries surprise us, forcing revision of our assumptions. Finds made by the Als archaeological project during its last two field seasons have certainly done that. The project is an ongoing landscape study on the island of Als, the most southwestern island in the Baltic archipelago, conducted by the Universities of Cambridge and Durham in conjunction with the British Museum and Haderslev Museum, Denmark. The primary aim of the project is to investigate long-term history as it is shaped within specific local contexts. The work carried out each season (ten seasons so far) has consisted of a combination of methods, with systematic fieldwalking, trial excavations and information gathered from local farmers, remaining the central ones. Of these fieldwalking, with its collection of all pre-medieval surface material, is the most important. It provides us with nuanced field by field characterisation in terms of the amount and composition of the material found within 5 x 100 metre lanes (some 600 hectares so far). On this basis, it has been possible to identify both general long-term tendencies in terms of, for example, the degree of clustering or movement away from the coastal zone, and also periods of distinct changes in attitudes to and use of the landscape.
         Here we wish, however, to report briefly upon some of the excavation results from the last two seasons. Fieldwalking had already identified an area close to the innermost point of Dyvig Fjord as worthy of further investigation. We had recorded a blue glass bead, indicating late Iron Age or Viking activities, and further up the slopes an unusually high frequency of pottery as well as iron working debris and some flint tools. In combination with the local topography and place names, these finds suggested a likely location for a Viking Age settlement. However, further investigation, organised by Haderslev Museum found nothing, and we were resigned to these being random stray finds.
        Meanwhile, due to our unrelated interest in the clustering of sites around the area of the later medieval village of Holm, we decided in 1999 to carry out trial excavations at the top of the slope leading down to the northern edge of the fjord. Three 50 metre long trial trenches were dug. Two of these were placed at the top of the area previously investigated with a view down towards the water, while the third (trench 3), equally close to the coast, was 'tucked-away' behind the hilly edge moraine.
        While the three trenches contained several features, none of these were particularly noteworthy apart from providing dates from the Late Bronze Age to the Roman Iron Age. There was one exception, however. At the northern end of trench 3 we found a few very abraded sherds of unmistakable early Middle Neolithic date. This was a surprise, despite the recovery of flint tools during fieldwalking, since the area to the East had been empty of flint residues. The sherds were thus in a peripheral location in relation to the area used during the Middle Neolithic, which made them even more interesting.
        The Neolithic sherds, small as they were, were highly decorated and included a fragment of a so-called clay-spoon, suggesting they may derive from a megalithic monument. Although there was no suggestion of features on the surface, this had to be investigated. During the 2000 and 2001 seasons the excavation of further trenches started to produce surprises. The trenches, despite the limited area covered, revealed an entirely concealed history of repeated use.
        The first sign of use consisted of at least three megalithic structures, of which we have now excavated two. Amongst the startling discoveries is how the people constructing the megalithic monuments 'coped' with the loose sandy natural in this area by bringing in pure clay to be used as a foundation for the stones around the grave chamber and as 'holding-material' for the dry-wall (see Figure 1). Along the south-eastern section of the now missing kerb-stones, we found large amounts of heavily abraded sherds from high quality decorated vessels - presumably the remains of pots placed around the entrance area. The pottery shows the three monuments to be of the same date, Middle Neolithic period II.
        To add to the sense of revelation, within the grave area of each of the excavated monuments was found a much later Corded Ware battle axe, such as are typically found in graves from the end of the Neolithic. Interestingly, the two axes are typologically very similar but the quality of their production is remarkably different. One of the axes was placed in a shaft-grave dug into the base of the chamber, while the other was placed on the surface within the other grave chamber. This seems to be a difference reflecting changes through time in the construction of Corded Ware graves, and it is possible that the graves are local interpretations of changing customs on the mainland.
        This, however, was not the final episode. Much later, around 1000-1100 AD, in the construction of a number of sunken-floor buildings, the chamber of one of the megalithic graves was dug through, and the clay platform and its embedded dry-wall reused - maybe as some kind of associated area or as a foundation for a roof-carrying post.
        Unravelling this sequence, the long time gaps must be noticed. Therefore, although we might like to see this as an example of prehistoric communities deliberately reusing and making connections with the past, some scepticism about the consciousness and reasons for the link must be voiced. While the repeated incorporation of the earlier structures is clearly deliberate, its motivation is potentially complex. The Corded Ware reuse of the grave chambers may thus simultaneously have been affected by a sense of reverence for this as a special place, maybe even as a burial monument, and yet at the same time found it appropriate to assault it. The area investigated was limited and the time spent short; but the many surprises and the various forms they took, were the kind of valuable lessons that make fieldwork a joy.

Marie Louise Stig Sørensen,
Dept. of Archaeology, University of Cambridge

Sam Lucy,
Dept. of Archaeology, Durham University



        As the Prehisioric Society's recent report Understanding the British Iron Age emphasises, social and economic developments in the centuries immediately following the adoption of iron are much less well understood than those during the later Bronze Age or in the period after 300 BC. One reason is the notorious plateau in the Carbon 14 calibration curve, which makes close dating difficult outside the pottery-'rich' areas of southern and eastern England. Another is the amorphous nature of much of the early Iron Age settlement record, which has inhibited regional synthesis. The recent re-dating of the Ewart Park and Blackamoor industries, placing the transition from the Bronze Age to the Iron Age in the eighth century BC, has exacerbated these difficulties by further opening up the void in the metalwork sequence created by the cessation of bronze hoarding across Britain. On the positive side, the explosion of developer-funded archaeology in the wake of PPG16 and its analogues in Scotland and Wales, has uncovered a significant amount of new evidence for early Iron Age settlement in different parts of Britain. We therefore decided that the time was ripe for a reassessment of the period and what we now know about the character of society in Britain between 800-300 BC.
        The outcome was a two-day research seminar attended by over sixty invited participants, held at the University of Durham in December 2001. In order to set the British material in context, the first session, European Communities, focused on changes in mainland Europe and the Atlantic fringe. Papers by Peter Wells, Anthony Harding, Marie-Louise Sørensen, and Jon Henderson began the meeting by identifying the early Iron Age as a time of social fragmentation and outlined some key themes requiring further discussion, such as identity, social organisation and contact. After lunch, attention shifted to The Everyday. JD Hill and Jodie Humphrey re-evaluated the roles of pottery use and lithic technology in the early to mid first millennium BC, whilst Graeme Guilbert and Rachel Pope reinterpreted the evidence for earlier Iron Age houses and the use of domestic space. In the remaining two papers, by Niall Sharples, and by Chris Gosden and Gary Lock, the focus shifted to Wessex and to the maintenance of community identities and the nature of inter-community contacts by early hillfort populations. The papers displayed a healthy variety of approaches to the period, notably in the use of material culture to provide insights into daily activities, which surely heralds the demise of static models of social behaviour in the Iron Age.
        The following morning, People in Transition, began with a paper by Stuart Needham on the differences either side of 800 BC and then one by Ian Ralston and Patrick Ashmore on changes in Scotland during the early Iron Age. Richard Hingley explored ideas regarding shifts in household and community organisation, whilst Mel Giles and Richard Bradley looked at the processes involved in land division, and Dale Serjeantson discussed the intensification of animal husbandry. Seeking to explore the processes behind the social changes which are apparent in the early Iron Age, the ensuing discussion focused on possible changes in descent systems, methods of display and the changing use of land and landscape. In the final session, Living in the Landscape, we had a glimpse of the good quality of regional-level studies currently taking place. Presentations by Tim Champion and Ann Woodward revealed a frustrating lack of evidence in certain regions, contrasting with the wealth of data now available in others like the East Midlands, which were previously relatively unknown. The final group of papers by Tom Moore, Bill Bevan, Jeremy Taylor, and Steve Willis centred on regional settlement and landscape and helped to bring out the character of early Iron Age settlement in different parts of central England.
        Both days provided good discussion and the overall outlook was very positive. In particular, the seminar began to characterise the earlier Iron Age in its own right. Real cultural change is consistently apparent in the archaeological record from the Bronze Age-Iron Age transition onwards, with changes in settlement forms and location, land use, inter-community contact, diet, depositional practices, domestic architecture and, ultimately, community identity and organisation. It was also clear from the meeting that Iron Age studies are starting to come to terms with the varied evidence for the period, finding new ways to meet wider aims and attempting to strike a balance between local-level interpretation and broader narratives of change.
        The proceedings of the seminar are to be published.

Rachel Pope & Colin Haselgrove
Dept. of Archaeology, University of Durham



Past Presidents of the Society
         We have had two separate requests for information on past presidents of the Society. A lady in Canberra is trying to find out about a relative, Walter Chrystie Underwood, who was president of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia and died in 1919. A student in Ireland is conducting research on Dr Adolf Mahr, who was President of the Prehistoric Society in the early 1930s, an interesting period for archaeology and society. She would like to know the exact time frame of his presidency and any other details. If any readers have information on either of these people, please contact our administrator who will pass the information on.

New Prehistoric Gallery at the British Museum
         Prehistory: Objects of Power, rooms 36/37, British Museum, from 28th March 2002.
This new exhibition illustrates the varied ways in which prehistoric objects, both the mundane and the exceptional, could be involved in the exercise of power and control from the earliest times up until the end of the European Bronze Age.

'Iron Age Research Student Seminar' (IARSS), Glasgow, 1st-2nd June, 2002.
         IARSS is a forum for students to present their ideas and to discuss issues concerning the Iron Age. Some of the topics to be presented include: geochemical survey methodology to identify and characterise metal working residues, diet in the British Iron Age, deities in Northern Britain, and the re-use of monuments in Iron Age Scotland. Students wanting to present papers/posters (new deadline for abstracts, 29th April) or anyone wanting to attend the seminars please contact:
Dept. of Archaeology, Lilybank Gardens, University of Glasgow, G128QQ or

'Recent Research and a New Agenda: The Prehistory of London', London, 12th Sept. 2002.
         Topics will include the recent work at Perry Oaks, Heathrow, the A13 in East London, the channel tunnel rail link, the prehistory of the City, the River Thames and environmental change. For details contact Jane Sidell, Institute of Archaeology, UCL, 31-34 Gordon Sq. London WC1H OPY.

'Prehistoric Pottery: People, Pattern and Purpose', Bradford, 12-13th Oct. 2002.
         The conference is jointly organised by the Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group and the Ceramics Petrology Group, and will be held at the University of Bradford. The conference organisers would welcome offers of papers on any aspect of Prehistoric Pottery. The offers received so far include papers from France, Sweden, Romania, Spain and Germany as well as Britain and Ireland. The conference fee will be £10 for students/unwaged and £15 for others. This will include a wine reception. For further details please contact Alex Gibson, Dept of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, BD7 1DP

or visit the PCRG website at



        The society tries to arrange a variety of events for its members. Expert guides are a feature of its foreign and UK study tours. Frequently, the tours offer the chance to see material which is not publicly available, or simply difficult to access. This year's foreign study tour will certainly take you off the beaten track.......

Saturday 12th October - Saturday 19th October 2002 (8 days)
guided by Professor Graeme Barker (Society President) and Professor David Mattingly price £1,750

Wadi Teshuinat
Hunting scene from the Wadi Teshuinat, Tadrat Akakus

        The tour will explore the wonderful rock art, rock shelters, palaeolake sites and amazing desert landscapes in the south-west of Libya. The prime mountain areas of painted rock art (Tadrart Akakus) and engraved rock art (Messak Sattafet) will both be visited, along with neighbouring depressions and sand sea landscapes, which also contain important evidence for early human activity. Particular interest focuses on the transition to farming and the emergence of agriculture in this zone, leading to the formation of a complex state in the 1st millennium BC (the Garamantes). International flights are into and out of Tripoli, and there will be the opportunity to visit the impressive National Museum there. Internal flights will take you to Sabha, and accommodation for the 5 nights in the south will be in camps with tents which sleep 2 or 3 each, on soft bedding rolls. You will need to take your own sleeping bag. There are, however, electricity and shower / washing facilities and toilets.

For further details and booking form contact:
Andante Travels, The Old Barn, Old Road, Alderbury, Salisbury, SP5 3AR
Tel: 01722 713800



Grimes Graves
An atmospheric shot of the extensive sunken areas showing the position of Neolithic flint mine shafts at Grimes Graves. Norfolk
(© English Heritage. Photograph by Steve Cole)

        No visit to this area would be complete without a visit to Grimes Graves, shown in the photograph. Current tour plans also include Norfolk museum, where collections not normally on display will be accessible, visits to a barrow cemetery and some Iron Age forts, and the chance to see all manner of things from flints, to a submerged forest and an elephant. As usual, there will be a variety of experts to guide the tour and present the latest information. The precise details of this tour are still being prepared - one factor is tide times - but if you would like to register your potential interest, write to our administrator Tessa Machling at the Society's London address so that she can send out the details as soon as they are finalised.

Home Page The Prehistoric Society Home Page