Jakarta became a post-independence boomtown, more than quadrupling
in size from 1975 to a population of 9.1 million in 1995. It now
has a metropolitan population approaching 12 million, though the
actual figure of inhabitants is a matter of speculation. Population
density is extremely high.
Indonesia uses the term kampung, which literally means ‘village’,
but which has come to denote a poorer neighbourhood that is contained
within a city. However, as it comprises a mix of lower and middle
class and frequently contains permanent buildings, it is not really
synonymous with slums. Squatters are few and most residents have
some sort of title to the land. Kampungs are really remnants of
original villages upon which cities have encroached and not vice
versa. The controversial transmigration policies of the Suharto
government may have eased the urban growth pressures; but rapid
industrialization of the 1970s and 1980s has counterbalanced attempts
to stem urban growth.Jakarta’s growth is higher than the official
figures, as it excludes seasonal migrants who may spend as much
as ten months per year in Jakarta. It is estimated that 20 to 25
per cent of Jakarta residents live in kampungs, with an additional
4 to 5 per cent squatting illegally along riverbanks, empty lots
and floodplains. Renters and squatters who have managed to set up
homes in the 490 pockets of poverty in Jakarta are gradually being
squeezed out due to skyrocketing land prices and speculation. The
past 20 years saw the land area occupied by kampungs in Jakarta
reduced by 50 per cent. As a result, nearly half of the families
have been relocated to Jakarta’s outlining areas.
Population projections indicate that urban dwellers will surpass
their rural counterparts as a percentage of the total between 2010
and 2015, rising to 60 per cent by 2025. At the same time, land
prices and land speculation have dramatically reduced available
land for low-income housing. Families who were pushed out set up
residence in outlying areas, creating new squatter, illegal and
semi-legal settlements.
Jakarta is a melting pot of the strong ethnic identities
of Indonesians; but, fortunately, a sense of shared solidarity among
the poor and the near poor tends to keep social and ethnic tensions
that have disrupted Indonesia for the past half decade at bay –
at least within the confines of the kampungs.
Since kampungs are not administrative entities, nobody
really knows with any real degree of accuracy how many of Jakarta’s
inhabitants call kampungs home. Furthermore, not everyone living
there is poor. For more than 30 years, the Suharto government sought
to impose total control over the citizenry, co-opting traditional
institutions and leadership and making them subservient to government-controlled
structures. Crony capitalism became commonplace, increasing the
gap between rich and poor. Corruption and nepotism came to flourish
to the point where even the most menial of bureaucratic tasks would
seldom be completed without a bribe. The period of prolonged economic
growth under Suharto saw many new roads being built and a functioning
public transportation system; sewer and drainage systems were also
constructed, and the national electricity grid was extended into
almost all regions. However, local government revenue fell increasingly
short of needs, and infrastructure deteriorated rapidly through
sheer lack of maintenance. The state-owned monopolies in water and
sanitation, power and telecommunications were operated with an inefficiency
remarkable even by most developing country standards. Government
policies and programmes for housing have been entirely inadequate
in meeting the needs of the urban poor; for all intents and purposes,
the government abdicated its role in the provision of housing. The
reform in the wake of Suharto’s resignation did little to
change politics at the local level.
This summary
has been extracted from:
UN-Habitat (2003) Global Report on Human Settlements 2003, The Challenge
of Slums, Earthscan, London; Part IV: 'Summary of City Case Studies',
pp195-228.