Ana
Aceska
Curriculum Vitae
Current Project
|
My doctoral research is a contribution to the ethnography
of city life. Cities have traditionally been seen (by their
inhabitants and analysts alike) as zones where rigid, traditional
status and ethnic distinctions sustainable in rural life dissolve
in a melting pot of anonymous public space and, eventually,
a ‘society of the masses’. We now know that cities
give rise to new forms of distinction. One of the most dramatic
of these is the formal division of a city along ethnic/political/religious
lines. After a long process of war-time ethnic cleansing (1992-1995),
mass deportation and land seizure, the formerly mixed city
of Mostar in Bosnia and Herzegovina has been spatially and
institutionally divided between Bosniaks (Muslims) and Croats
(Catholics), a process that officially lasted until 2004,
when a formal reunification of the city was agreed. I am currently
investigating how these processes of spatial and institutional
division and reunification take place through ‘negotiations’
(often bodily, silent, informal, but at times noisy and conflictual)
among the two ethnic groups over the use of public space.
My main research questions are driven by the situation I find
in Mostar today: What is the interplay between national (re)building
processes (and post-war ethnic relations) and the social construction
of public space? How is the management of public space in
the post-war processes of spatial and institutional division
and partial attempts at reunification achieved? How are the
people from the two communities “creating” public
spaces that will serve as “instruments” in building
their distinct identity in the city? Are they doing it by
creating public spaces that are exclusively “theirs”
or do they use different means than this? If yes, what are
the “means” that people form the two communities
“create” in making public spaces “ours”
and “theirs”?
Mostar represents an ideal place to study these issues. With
a long history of multiethnic and multireligous urban life
and the absence of “borders” in public spaces,
until 1992, it allows for an
|