|
|
|
|
| Research bulletin: understanding the crime fall |
|
MSc Open Evening - 14 Scholarships |
|
|
|
|
MASTER CLASSES FOR ALL |
|
Problem solving, analysis and implementing responses Next date TBC |
ANALYST COURSES |
|
Neighbourhood Analysis 21 May 2013 |
|
Predictive Mapping *NEW* 23 May 2013 |
|
Advanced Hotspot Analysis 2 July 2013 |
|
Strategic Assessments 4 July 2013 |
|
COURSE IS FULL! 8-19 July 2013 |
|
Crime Analysis 23-26 September 2013 |
|
Understanding Hotspots 8 October 2013 |
|
Hypothesis Testing Analysis Next date TBC |
|
Causality and Decision Theory: A Statistical Perspective
| Date: | Thursday, August 19, 2004 | |
| Time: | 16:00 | |
| Link: | http://www.uni-konstanz.de/ppm/summerschool2004/index.htm |
| Location: | Causality, Uncertainty & Ignorance, 3rd International Summer School 2004, University of Konstanz, Germany | |
| Contact Name: | Rolf Haenni | |
| Contact Phone: | (0049) 7531 88 4885 |
In recent years Statisticians, Economists, Epidemiologists
and others have paid increased attention to making and justifying causal
inferences on the basis of data. They have used a variety of underlying
philosophies - e.g. determinism, counterfactuals; of representational
frameworks - e.g. algebraic, graphical; and of the methodological
approaches - e.g. potential response models, do-calculus. But beneath
this diversity there appears to be general agreement that causal
inference necessitates some special machinery, over and above what has
traditionally been adequate for statistical modelling.
I believe that this is mistaken, and that the additional mathematical
richness of such frameworks only promotes confusion, paradox and error -
even at its best overcomplicating what should be straightforward. The
vast majority of problems of practical causal inference can be simply
and fruitfully understood, formulated and solved using already
well-established probabilistic language and methodology, especially
conditional independence and decision theory. They can also benefit from
established decision aids such as influence diagrams.
In this talk I shall argue against the richer frameworks, and in favour
of a simple decision-theoretic approach. I shall indicate how this
clarifies such issues as confounding in observational studies and
sequential treatment regimes, and provides protection against over-glib
causal interpretation of statistical data.
Speaker
| Name: | Professor Philip Dawid | |
| Affiliation: | University College London | |
| Homepage: | http://www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk/%7Eucak06d/ | |
| Biography |
Philip Dawid is Professor of
Statistics at Cambridge University, having been Pearson Professor of
Statistics at University College London from 1989 to 2007. He is
Chartered Statistician and Fellow of the Royal Statistical Society,
which has awarded him Guy Medals in Bronze and Silver; elected Fellow of
the Institute of Mathematical Statistics; elected Member of the
International Statistical Institute; and a Member of the Organising
Committee for the Valencia International Meetings on Bayesian
Statistics. He has served as Editor of the Journal of the Royal
Statistical Society (Series B) and of Biometrika, and is currently an
Editor of Bayesian Analysis. He was President of the International
Society for Bayesian Analysis for the year 2000.
Page last modified on 27 may 11 09:04






