Corpus Refs: | Macalister/1945:230 OSullivan/etal/1996:936 |
Site: | CLCAH |
Discovery: | recognised, 1909 Lynch, P.J. |
History: | Macalister/1945, 224, cites P.J. Lynch as the first recorder of the stone in 1909. He also states that it was `standing at the entrance to a ring-fort on the townland'. OSullivan/1996, 266, 269: `An ogham stone is now located outside the E. entrance...This ogham stone originally stood at the E entrance of the site...but now lies on two concrete mounts just outside of it at S.' |
Geology: | Macalister/1945, 224: `slate'. |
Dimensions: | 2.08 x 0.38 x 0.18 (converted from Macalister/1945) |
Setting: | in ground |
Location: | on site OSullivan/1996, 266, 269: `An ogham stone is now located outside the E. entrance...This ogham stone originally stood at the E entrance of the site...but now lies on two concrete mounts just outside of it at S.' |
Form: | plain |
Condition: | complete , some |
Folklore: | none |
Crosses: | none |
Decorations: | no other decoration |
Macalister, R.A.S. (1945): | D[...]A[.C.]AVIDALAGNI [-- Expansion: D[...]A[.C.] AVI DALAGNI [MAQI C-- Macalister/1945 224 reading only OSullivan/etal/1996 269 reading only |
Orientation: | vertical up |
Position: | n/a ; arris ; n/a ; undecorated |
Incision: | inc |
Date: | - (Macalister/1945) Macalister/1945, 224, saw this inscription as earlier than the other on this stone. |
Language: | Goidelic (ogham) |
Ling. Notes: | none |
Palaeography: | none |
Legibility: | poor OSullivan/etal/1996, 269: `difficult to decipher'. Macalister/1945, 224: `in poor condition'. |
Lines: | 1 |
Carving errors: | 0 |
Doubtful: | no |
Macalister, R.A.S. (1945): | EQQEGGNIMAQIMAQICARATTINN Expansion: EQQEGGNI MAQI MAQI-CARATTINN Macalister/1945 224 reading only OSullivan/etal/1996 269 reading only |
Orientation: | vertical up |
Position: | n/a ; arris ; n/a ; undecorated |
Incision: | inc |
Date: | - (Macalister/1945) Macalister/1945, 224, swa this as the latter of the two inscriptions on this stone. |
Language: | Goidelic (ogham) |
Ling. Notes: | McManus/1991, 79 alludes to this stone as being one that used the X-forfid with its vocalic value, also see McManus/1991, 121. |
Palaeography: | Macalister/1945, 224: `It begins EQQEGGNI 2[nd] E being represented by the forfid (in the form ><)'. |
Legibility: | poor Macalister/1945, 224: `in poor condition'. OSullivan/1996, 269: `difficult to decipher'. Macalister/1945, 224, argues that this inscription supersedes CLCAH/1/1. |
Lines: | 1 |
Carving errors: | 0 |
Doubtful: | no |