Constitution Unit opinion pieces and letters
Long-form written comment in the media from the Constitution Unit team.
2026
The Brexit effect on perceptions of referendums
UCL Europe Blog (23 June 2026)Professor Alan Renwick reflects, on the tenth anniversary of the EU referendum, on how referendums should be used in the UK.
Reforms of the House of Lords that succeed are gradualist and piecemeal
History Extra (June 2026)Professor Meg Russell explains the history of House of Lords reform, emphasising that this has been gradualist and piecemeal, and what this says about future reforms.
Misconduct in public office: three reasons why the case against Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is so complex
The Conversation (23 February 2026)Professor Robert Hazell says that the vagueness of the offence, multiple police forces being involved and difficulties facing the CPS and courts make it unlikely that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s case will be brought to a swift conclusion.
2025
Prince Andrew’s ‘one peppercorn’ lease exposes how little is known about royal finances
The Conversation (29 October 2025)Professor Robert Hazell says that, short of legislation, there is little more that the palace can do about Prince Andrew. He also warns that it might be hard to avoid a wider parliamentary inquiry into royal finances.
Plans for electoral reform mark a major step forward in reforming our democracy
UCL Policy Lab (17 July 2025)Professor Alan Renwick analyses the new elections white paper. He says that the government’s announcements are very welcome, but do not go far enough.
Let officials speak
The Times (14 July 2025)Professor Meg Russell joins the leaders of other think tanks to urge the government to withdraw its new guidance on officials publicly speaking.
Public wants much greater Lords reform than government’s modest plan – new survey
The Conversation (2 July 2025)Professor Meg Russell explains our recent opinion polling results and the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill, urging parliamentarians to go further than the government’s current plans.
Survey shows support for electoral reform now at 60% – so could it happen?
The Conversation (27 June 2025)Professor Alan Renwick suggests that electoral reform in the UK is becoming more likely, but almost certainly not until the 2030s.
Democratic erosion is real
Prospect Magazine (11 June 2025)Some institutional changes could make attacks on democracy harder. A great deal needs to be done, but it would cost little money and it is all possible, says Professor Alan Renwick.
Should we be worried about the decline of parliamentary scrutiny?
Civil Service World (9 May 2025)Professor Meg Russell says that standards of scrutiny in recent years have declined, including after the Brexit and the Covid-19 periods. This is a reproduction of an earlier blog post.
Support for Hermer
The Sunday Times (23 February 2025)Professor Meg Russell and the Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law’s Dr Jan van Zyl Smit defend the role of the Attorney General in response to recent negative briefings.
Freedom index
The Times (18 February 2025)Professor Robert Hazell addresses a recent speech by the US Vice President. He calls the critique of democracy and speech ‘breathtaking in its hypocrisy’.
2024
Rebuilding public trust in politicians
The Times (1 November 2024)Meg Russell and Peter Riddell join the leaders of the Institute for Government and UK Governance Project in signing a letter urging the Prime Minister to deliver on his commitment to strengthen the UK’s ethical landscape.
New Era for the UK House of Lords? Labour’s Removal of the Hereditary Peers and Possible Future Reforms
ConstitutionNet (31 October 2024)Professor Meg Russell writes about the removal of hereditary peers from the House of Lords, as well as what might be next for the chamber.
Britain is finally abolishing hereditary peers from the House of Lords – the historical reforms that built up to this moment
The Conversation (23 September 2024)Ahead of the removal of hereditary peers from the House of Lords, Professor Meg Russell provides a history of past attempts at reform of the upper chamber.
What to expect from the new House of Commons
UK in a Changing Europe (15 July 2024)Lisa James reflects on the post-general election House of Commons, highlighting that for Labour the primary challenge may be managing its now numerous backbenchers, while the Conservatives face the opposite problem, with the party’s depleted numbers creating difficulties for effective opposition.
The UK General Election: What might the future hold for ethical standards and checks on executive power?
RevDem (3 July 2024)As the UK heads to the polls against a backdrop of ethics scandals and the weakening of constitutional norms, Lisa James explains what we can expect from the next government.
Restoring trust in the political class
The Times (24 June 2024)Professor Meg Russell and Professor Robert Hazell are joined by numerous others in writing a letter to The Times in support of a statement on standards jointly published by the Institute for Government, Constitution Unit and UK Governance Project.
How to regulate, maintain, and improve standards in public life
Conservative Home (3 April 2024)Former Commissioner for Public Appointments Peter Riddell summarises his and Robert Hazell’s most recent report.
Proposed shake-up of cabinet government
The Times (12 March 2024)Robert Hazell provides a short reaction to the Institute for Government’s latest report and calls for a smaller cabinet.
Prince William’s role as Defender of the Faith
The Times (19 January 2024)Robert Hazell and Bob Morris discuss the ancient settlement between church and state.
2023
The North needs care and attention
eolas Magazine (October 2023)Northern Ireland’s political system is in trouble, argue Professor Alan Renwick and Conor Kelly.
Control the PR, lose the hangers-on: lessons for Charles from Europe’s royals
The Guardian (5 May 2023)Five lessons the king may want to consider, based on what has gone right – and wrong – for Europe’s surviving monarchies, according to Professor Robert Hazell.
The Privileges Committee matters; but Boris Johnson’s far greater dishonesty was over Brexit
Prospect (28 April 2023)Professor Meg Russell writes about honesty in politics.
2022
Netflix’s Harry & Meghan: the Sussexes are not unique in being royal victims
The Conversation (19 December 2022)Professor Robert Hazell and Dr Bob Morris argue that the challenges faced by Harry & Meghan are shared by royals across Europe.
Adviser on integrity
The Times (3 December 2022)Professor Meg Russell joins Daniel Bruce, Susan Hawley, Dave Penman and Hannah White to urge the Prime Minister to appoint an Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests and to strengthen the scope of the role in line with CSPL recommendations.
Why abolishing the House of Lords is not the answer
Prospect Magazine (24 November 2022)Keir Starmer is right to want to reform the second chamber, argues Professor Meg Russell, but the key question is how far to go.
‘Baroque’ leadership rules and cabinet changes
The Times (26 October 2022)Following the fall of Liz Truss and installation of Rishi Sunak as Prime Minister, Professor Meg Russell authored a letter in the Times arguing that the episode demonstrates that membership ballots risks instability.
Why member ballots for party leaders threaten parliamentary democracy
Prospect Magazine (23 October 2022)Professor Meg Russell argues that the UK’s parliamentary system is undermined when party leaders are chosen by grassroots members, but lack support from their own MPs.
No 10’s Brexit posturing is dicing with disaster in Northern Ireland
The Sunday Times (10 May 2022)Following the results of the Northern Ireland Assembly elections, in this lead letter to the Sunday Times, Professor Alan Renwick stresses that constructive engagement from London will be needed to restore power-sharing government in Northern Ireland.
Commons cause
The Times (24 April 2022)In the lead up to the local elections, Professor Alan Renwick argues that Boris Johnson’s fate should not be determined by the outcome. As Constitution Unit research shows, one politician lying erodes public trust in all, so public disapproval cannot be gauged by how many votes shift between parties. It is up to MPs to act.
Electoral fairness
The Times (22 April 2022)Prior to a House of Lords vote on proposals to change how the Electoral Commission is governed, Professor Alan Renwick, along with other experts, urge peers to reject the proposal to add a ‘Strategy and Policy statement’ setting out how the Commission should operate.
Parties scandal and calls for the PM to resign
The Times (14 April 2022)The Prime Minister and Chancellor have broken the Ministerial Code, writes Professor Meg Russell in this letter for the Times. Both are resigning matters, but the keeper of the code is the PM himself. In the absence of compliance it falls to MPs to act.
Voters care about integrity in politics even more than you think
Prospect Magazine (11 April 2022)Politicians lying may not always lose them votes – but it is deeply damaging to our democracy argues Professor Alan Renwick, commenting on the conclusions of the Citizens’ Assembly on Democracy in the UK after Brexit.
British voters want lying politicians to face consequences – new study
The Conversation (7 April 2022)Commenting on the latest Constitution Unit findings on public attitudes towards democracy in the UK, Professor Alan Renwick outlines the key conclusions of the Citizens’ Assembly on democracy in the UK, which confirmed that integrity and honesty in politics are of great concern to the public. This means that there is a desire to see ministers kept in constant check by parliament, courts and the public at large.
Voters value honesty in their politicians above all else – new study
The Conversation (26 January 2022)In the wake of ‘partygate’ allegations, Professor Alan Renwick discusses major new findings on public attitudes towards democracy in the UK. The results of a large-scale survey of the UK population show that integrity and ‘being honest’ are among the most valued qualities in a politician.
2021
What to expect of a modern monarchy
The Guardian (31 December 2021)In the lead letter to the Guardian, Professor Robert Hazell and Dr Bob Morris propose revisions to the three statutory oaths which must be taken by the reigning monarch.
How might Irish unification be decided?
The Loop (11 December 2021)If a referendum on Irish unification ever takes place, how should it be designed and conducted? Professor Alan Renwick and Conor J. Kelly explore the issue of Irish unification from the perspective of how best to plan for a possible future referendum.
The “cash for peerages” scandal shows we urgently need better democratic protections
Prospect Magazine (9 November 2021)The House of Lords places far too much patronage power in the hands of a potentially rogue Prime Minister, argues Professor Meg Russell.
When to call a referendum in Northern Ireland
Prospect Magazine (3 June 2021)Dr Alan Renwick explains how the UK government should judge when and whether a majority for Irish unification has emerged.
UK government must loosen its grip on parliamentary process
Financial Times (24 April 2021)Temporary measures introduced in a pandemic panic should have been phased out a long time ago, argues Professor Meg Russell.
Marginalised MPs
The Times (21 April 2021)Parliament’s marginalisation by the government during the pandemic has been ‘shocking’, writes Professor Meg Russell, Ruth Fox, Ronan Cormacain and Joe Tomlinson in a letter to The Times.
Scottish independence referendum options
The Times (24 February 2021)In the lead letter to the Times, Dr Alan Renwick and Professor Meg Russell explain that Scotland has a right to a referendum if voters want one, and such a referendum needn’t be between binary choices.
It’s time for MPs to take back control of the Commons
The Times (19 January 2021)The government’s level of control over what is debated in the House of Commons, and when, undermines parliamentary accountability and needs addressing urgently, argues Professor Meg Russell, joint author of a new report on the issue.
Democracy at risk
The Times (11 January 2021)In the wake of the storming of the Capitol in Washington DC, Professor Meg Russell warns that if senior political figures in the UK fail to respect, uphold, and celebrate constitutional rules, they risk undermining the legitimacy of core institutions of democracy.
2020
We need to talk about referendums, north and south, on Irish unification
The Times (30 November 2020)A referendum on Irish unification – a so-called border poll – might happen in the coming years. The government doesn’t want one, but may have little choice, says Dr Alan Renwick.
What’s the secret of modern monarchy’s survival?
The Times (28 September 2020)Professor Robert Hazell and Dr Bob Morris write about the findings from their new book, The Role of Monarchy in Modern Democracy: European Monarchies Compared, which discusses the royal family in modern society.
New election transparency rules—a step in the right direction, but not far enough
Prospect Magazine (19 August 2020)The government’s plan to require ‘imprints’ on online election materials is a welcome step, but this stricter plan for online political ads is just one of the changes required to safeguard democracy, explain Michela Palese and Dr Alan Renwick.
How a virtual parliament should work
Conservative Home (16 April 2020)Professor Meg Russell and Ruth Fox set out some key principles for a virtual parliament during the coronavirus pandemic.
Boris Johnson in hospital: constitutional expert on what this means for UK governance
The Conversation (8 April 2020)Professor Robert Hazell authors an article explaining how government is being conducted whilst Prime Minister Boris Johnson is in hospital with coronavirus.
Why grassroots members shouldn’t choose party leaders
The Conversation (5 February 2020)In the run-up to the Labour leadership election, Professor Meg Russell explains why party leadership ballots are bad for parliamentary democracy, and what can be done.
Why half in, half out just isn’t an option for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle
The Conversation (11 January 2020)Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s decision to step back from royal duties has been described as a crisis for the monarchy, but they are the ones who are most likely to suffer the damage, explain Professor Robert Hazell and Dr Bob Morris.