Professor Argyris Stringaris


I am a clinician and a neuroscientist studying mood and anxiety. I was appointed Chair of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at UCL in January 2022. Until then, I was Senior Investigator and Chief of the Section of Clinical and Computational Psychiatry at NIMH/NIH in the USA and before that a Senior Lecturer and a Wellcome Trust Fellow at the Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London. I trained in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at the Maudsley Hospital.

I received the 2018 Outstanding Mentor Award by the National Institute of Mental Health, as well as the 2019 NIH Director Award, and this year I was amongst the World’s Highly Cited researchers, according to Clarivate Analytics.

Our team attained 2nd place (tied) in the Open Neuro Hall of Fame for contributing our datasets to open science.

Research Interests

I have two main research aims.

In terms of basic research, my aim is to understand how affective phenomena (variably termed moods, emotions, feelings or affects) are generated and maintained. In terms of clinical research, I study interventions that reduce the negative impact that affective phenomena, particularly depression, can have on young people and families.

An example of our work on mood is this pre-print recently accepted for publication by Nature Human Behaviour.

Below is an outline of two of my main areas of research interest.


Depression in young people is thought of as a global public health challenge, according to the World Health Organisation. Yet, there is controversy about how best to define depression and there is agreement that we need to do better treating it.

My research has recently focused on what my colleagues and I have termed the Great Expectation of the field, namely the relationship between depression and reward processing.

Stated briefly, the idea is that anhedonia, one of the most characteristic presentations of depression, occurs because of aberrations in the way humans processes rewards. Anhedonia refers to the loss of interest in previously pleasant activities or the inability to experience pleasure altogether. The reward system is well understood across animal species and we have made considerable advances in the computational modelling of reward processes. Hence the great expectation that focusing on reward processing and anhedonia two can help solve the riddle of depression. Indeed, we have shown that depression and depression (particularly anhedonia) relate to the ways the brain processes rewards. And so have others. But we have also shown in recent work using metanalyses and simulations, that the effect is still relatively small and hard to use clinically. This is perhaps part of the bigger issue of how good we are in relating brain processes to behaviour—see our recent work on suicidal ideation, but also new ways of modelling this relationship, such using explainable machine learning models and solving problems relating to longitudinal developmental imaging and the relationship with genetic findings.

Based on ideas about reward and depression, we have also ventured into experimental studies to help us understand mood. We have recently shown how early experiences shape the way we rate our own mood. We have also described a phenomenon which we term Mood Drift Over Time (MDOT), a decline in mood in the absence of events—the preprint was just accepted for publication by Nature Human Behaviour.

Clinically, we have recently produced some ideas about developmental origins of depression and anhedonia, and written on Behavioural Activation, one of the evidence-based treatments of depression.

In terms of next steps, we are:

a) Working with colleagues on re-defining affect and emotion to consider (and model) inter-personal aspects and societal factors. For this, we are drawing intellectually from other fields, such as sociology (e.g. Hochschild, Reckwitz), history (e.g. Kosseleck), and philosophy (Kondylis, Nussbaum).

b) Trying to get a deeper understanding of how psychological therapies work using social anxiety as a prototype—we hypothesise that improvement is predicated on the extent and way in which or expectations are not met and are trying to capture this quantitatively.

c) Asking how depression in families can lead to anger (also see below) and how to alleviate this. A key hypothesis in this work is that emotions are themselves subject to reinforcement, an idea which we have begun examining in a simple experimental set up.


We have defined irritability as a proneness to anger that may reach a pathological extent, and have shown that irritability in early life is an antecedent of a series of negative outcomes, particularly depression. We have also shown that irritability and depression share genetic underpinnings.

My original interest in irritability came from observing young people who were labelled as having “disruptive behaviour” or “conduct problems”. I thought that for many of them, affect was the prominent feature. We posited that the dimension of irritability should be considered in young people as it may carry prognostic significance.

My interest also came from the fact that in some parts of the US, children with severe irritability were labelled as having bipolar disorder, for which we did not find support. As part of our work in irritability, we developed measures for it, such as a brief questionnaire, the Affective Reactivity Index—you can more information on this and the translations available, here.

Recently, we published with my colleagues a small treatment trial of youth with severe irritability.

My current research projects on irritability are:

a) Understanding the connections between power, affordance and anger. We have done some experimental work to show that environmental affordances influence the degree to which anger is experienced. The work will soon be available as a pre-print.

b) Preparing an overview of studies in irritability. I am co-leading a project on summarising work in irritability and on the needs of the field.

c) Describing and quantifying anger in inter-personal relationships, particularly within families. I am trying to model the ways in which anger is generated between two or more people, the purposes it may serve and how it is maintained. For this, I am collaborating with colleagues from Computer Science.

Our lab strives to be methodologically diverse and embrace a range of quantitative methods, as necessary in order to answer the relevant questions. Also, given that the importance of conceptual questions and qualitative research in the field we collaborate closely with historians, philosophers and social scientists.

Links to associate labs, centres and facilities 

I am a Consultant Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist at UCL’s University Clinic and a Senior Clinical Advisor at the Anna Freud Centre for Children and Families .

I am also a Professor at the University of Athens.

I collaborate closely with the Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit (Central Institute of Mental Health) in Germany and with my colleagues at the NIMH/NIH.