Mesolithic Britain and Ireland; new approaches, edited by Chantal
Conneller and Graeme Warren
Tempus, Stroud, 2006, 224 pages; 34 illustrations
and plates; ISBN 0-7524-3734-8 (£19.99)
The book is an edited volume of seven broadly themed chapters, which are reviewed
in turn as follows. In a chapter on technology by Graham Warren, case studies are
used to examine the relationship of society and technology in the Mesolithic rather
than the artefactual evidence per se. The author suggests our modern concept of
technology may hinder our understanding of Mesolithic views of objects. Graeme Warren
examines existing approaches to assemblages and the micro versus macro-scale approaches
used. Theoretical discussion is exemplified with examination of, for instance, bevel-ended
tools and discusses how with even simple tools the mechanics and networks of raw
material provision and manufacture are complex and as such can provide greater information
on society and use of the landscape than we usually attempt to glean. Case studies
are presented for progressively larger scales of study: of barbed antler point manufacture
at Star Carr, deposition of stone tools in Ireland and a consideration of ‘fracture
and combination’ or use of composite tools in Britain as a whole. He examines choice
and handling of material, knowledge of material properties, use, deliberate deposition
and the relationship of these tools to people’s wider view of the natural world.
'Gender and Personhood’ by Nyree Finlay begins with a theory-based narrative on
gender. A consideration of the assignment of artefactual remains and the activities
they represent to specific gender follows and the assumptions made on roles related
to gender and age from necessarily flawed application of modern ethnographic analogy
are questioned. Finlay refers to a tradition of ‘boys and arrows’ narratives for
the Mesolithic period, but also rightly suggests that often gender is not considered
at all for many sites. The author discusses Mount Sandel as one of the few sites
where more explicit statements have been made on gender roles and division of labour
where he questions their validity.
The history of subsistence studies for the Mesolithic is reviewed by Nicky Milner
and she author suggests that the basic approach has evolved little since the seminal
work of Clark at Star Carr, despite the advent of potentially exciting techniques
such as stable isotope, usewear and residue analyses. Milner suggests that many
new approaches might be taken to food and society, and she highlights the importance
of its sourcing, preparation and consumption in societal organisation. Rather than
considering the Mesolithic as one amorphous period, with evidence of diet used as
a set forming a whole that did not apply to any one group, the author encourages
a consideration of regional and temporal changes in consumption. Thought is also
given to seasonality and the problems of the palimpsest of evidence for season of
use faced by researchers at individual sites. A discussion on the little considered
but clearly interesting themes of menu, taboo, cooking and feasting follows and
includes a discussion of how specific foods might have been procured, and indeed
disposed of, based on a balanced use of archaeological evidence and ethnographic
observation. This contribution is particularly useful in showing how existing data
might be reassessed and how we might approach food use in future studies.
In his chapter on ‘Analogy’, Peter Jordan examines a perennial problem of the use
of ethnographic/ anthropological analogy in the interpretation of archaeological
remains. The author provides an excellent review of the history and methods of its
use and examines the implicit assumptions that are made for the period based on
ethnography, itself often flawed or limited by the assumptions of the observer.
However, he suggests there is a way forward, with a more balanced examination of
ethnohistorical sources, incorporating for instance consideration of symbolism and
spirituality in studies of hunter-gatherer subsistence practices, to enhance interpretation
of the Mesolithic. Jordan points out the opportunities such an approach provides
for ‘broadening our appreciation of the Mesolithic’ and to make it a more widely
interesting period of prehistory.
‘Ritual’ by Richard Chatterton investigates the archaeological evidence for ritual
and spiritual belief, which the author links firmly with everyday economic and subsistence
activity rather than splitting these important aspects of prehistoric life as is
often done. He introduces instances of deliberate and ordered disposal. These include
in shallow waters and waters-edge, though here more consideration of the possibility
some (notably organic and animal bone remains) might be merely artefacts of erosion
and/or location and that bias to preservation of remains in these locations is innate
to these wet environs would provide balance. Of note, however, the author highlights
the importance of Mesolithic relationships with wetland environments. Of particular
import is his suggestion that there is a need to obtain more absolute dates for
the human remains found in alluvial contexts in general and describes several instances
where possible Mesolithic material might be confirmed. Since known human remains
of Mesolithic age remain relatively scarce in Britain and Ireland and since there
is a very real possibility that disposal in water was favoured and wetland edge
localities focussed on for activity, this represents a key focus for future work.
The author continues with strong reviews of the symbolic and monumental aspects
of cave deposits, discard in pits and of shell midden creation and suggests with
regard to the latter that to view them as monuments in the Neolithic sense may not
be appropriate but that a conscious choice was made to create confined accumulations
of disposed materials including human remains.
Despite the title, Lesley McFadyen’s text entitled ‘landscape’ is not on Mesolithic
environs and exploitation as such. Rather it explores the idea of changing the natural
landscape with creation and use of space through clearance, activity and occupation
as architecture and considers Mesolithic perception and experience of their world.
She describes the concepts of abstract space and meaningful place, drawing on the
work in particular of Tilley and Edmonds. A case study of Mesolithic sites in North
Wiltshire is used to highlight the interaction of deliberate human effort with their
knowledge of complex natural process to create spaces in the landscape. The author
also discusses the concept of mobile space with networks of activity and people
creating and connecting the landscape.
Chantal Conneller’s chapter on death provides a thorough and engaging discussion
of known human remains dating to the Mesolithic. She points out that despite the
perceived paucity of remains, Mesolithic human remains are currently believed to
have been found, in addition to the cemetery site of Aveline’s Hole, in twenty-one,
dominantly cave site, locations in Britain and Ireland, yet few of these sites are
widely known or discussed. She reassesses the somewhat confused remaining evidence
from Aveline’s Hole to draw out what can be gleaned on mortuary practice including
placement of bodies, the probable short period of use of the site and the use of
ochre, shells, animal teeth and possibly cave art. In judging the nature of the
assemblages the author points out that with the exclusion of the Mesolithic Gough’s
Cave remains, all skeletons have been found to be disarticulated and most not formally
buried and suggests this is representative of a real phenomenon. The use of caves
in particular is discussed, with the suggestion that the dead were set apart and
away from everyday living sites.
An concluding overview by Bill Finlayson provides a synopsis and wider view of the
ideas presented and draws out that Mesolithic lives were socially more rich and
complex than we account for. Helpfully, each author considers the possibilities
for future research at the end of their chapter and these are brought together and
expanded upon in this closing chapter. Finlayson suggests the general view of the
authors is that the existing data set is adequate and capable of providing a better
understanding of the period. The volume should however perhaps acknowledge that
significant gaps in the archaeological record in this country do remain that may
be tackled using the new ways of prospecting for and identifying Mesolithic landsurfaces,
artefacts and associated environmental remains currently being developed in tandem
with these new theoretical approaches.
This volume is not a text book or review of British and Irish Mesolithic archaeology
not does it attempt to be. Instead it is a collection of thoughtful papers on aspects
of Mesolithic life and how we might usefully reassess our approach to the big archaeological
questions. It is of a highly theoretical bent and at times the terminology makes
the volume less accessible and will be off-putting to some readers, but it is worth
the effort, and brings some innovative ideas to the forefront. The authors make
good use of selected current research and published works, The volume overall would
have benefited from more illustration and plates of key finds and deposits referred
to in the text but there is a full and useful bibliography at the end of the volume.
Selected suggestions for further reading at the end of each chapter should prove
helpful to student readers, however this book is likely to appeal most to those
already actively involved in prehistoric research.
The enthusiasm of the authors and editors is most welcome, this book offers a different
way forward in the approach to the Mesolithic and one that should continue to be
debated and built on in the coming years. This is a much neglected period and there
is scope for much greater concentration of effort in this period, and it is hoped
books such as this will help to stimulate heightened that interest.
Catherine Chisham
Wessex Archaeology
Review Submitted: November 2006
The views expressed in this review are not necessarily those
of the Society or the Reviews Editor.
|