Stonehenge and Timber Circles, by ALEX GIBSON
Tempus. 2005 (Second edition). 189pp, 116 B+W line drawings and plates, 16 colour plates. ISBN 0 7524 3350 4 (£19.99)
Adorned with a colourful new cover, this is a revised edition of Alex Gibson’s
1998 volume of the same title. Here, Gibson provides a very readable and
accessible account of the Neolithic and Bronze Age timber circles of Britain
and Europe that will appeal to a popular as well as an academic audience. This
is an up-to date synthesis, as seen by the mention of very recent excavations
at Boscombe Down and Durrington Walls, and reference to the re-dating of Croft
Moraig, now placed firmly in the middle to late Bronze Age in a paper in the
latest issue of the Society’s Proceedings (Bradley & Sheridan
2005). Gibson is well qualified to write on this topic, having excavated two
timber circles in Powys, at Sarn-y-bryn-caled and Pont-ar-daf, and dedicated
much of his recent work to investigating aspects of late Neolithic and early
Bronze Age monumentality.
The book is divided into six chapters, and there is much detail here. The first
chapter is an exercise in scene setting, providing a brief synopsis of the
Neolithic and early Bronze Age in Britain – the ‘time of timber circles’.
Chapter 2 explores the context of timber circles: their relationship to henges,
cursus monuments and palisaded enclosures. Gibson stresses their diversity in
format (single and multiple rings, free-standing and enclosed, and so forth)
location, associations and date. A very convincing argument is presented for
the primacy of timber circles over their encircling henge enclosures at North
Mains, Milfield North, Arminghall, Woodhenge and elsewhere.
Via the evidence from radiocarbon dating, ceramic associations and structural
sequences, the chronology of timber circles is explored in the following
chapter. Illustrating the continuing need for better chronologies, it is
somewhat sobering that only 34 reliable and 24 indirect or unreliable
radiocarbon dates for timber circles are listed, and of the former several have
large ranges. The author sees sequence in the available repertoire of dated
sites, beginning with small diameter and unelaborated circles just before
3000BC, moving to large complex and multiple circles (eg Woodhenge, the
Sanctuary, Durrington Southern Circle) around 2500BC – a ‘climax’ – then
smaller and simpler sites, sometimes associated with burials, during the 2nd
millennium BC (eg Hungerford). The evidence presented is convincing. There are
of course exceptions to this scheme, as Gibson points out. In particular, the
Irish Iron Age multiple circles of Navan and Knockaulin stand out on the
grounds of their extremely late date and structural complexity. The striking
similarity in plan and format between Navan and later Neolithic multiple
circles leads Gibson to speculate that the Irish Iron Age circles could
represent a reinvention of tradition, kept alive by mythology and story
telling.
Chapter 4 on timber circles in Europe sits perhaps uneasily within the volume,
because of the discordant nature of the material. Much is made of the Rondell
sites of central Europe, such as the recently explored enclosures at Goseck and
Immendorf with their claimed solar and celestial alignments. While this is a
useful review and presentation of this material to an English-speaking
audience, these enclosures – which the late Andrew Sherratt suggested were
‘ersatz tells’ – are considerably different in format, genesis and date (mostly
early 5th millennium BC) to the timber circles of Britain and Ireland. To be
fair, the author acknowledges this. The best parallels for British circles, as
Gibson points out, are a few contemporary structures in the Netherlands, north
Germany and now southern Scandinavia. The ‘insularity’ of aspects of the
British late Neolithic and early Bronze Age is perhaps worth stressing.
Chapter 5 presents the diverse evidence for the functions of timber circles.
Much ground is covered, with all the familiar interpretive themes of recent
years being touched upon: claimed and demonstrated solar, lunar and cardinal
orientations; contexts for feasting and structured deposition; complex
architectures which structured procession, exclusion, control of access and the
playing out of power relations. Claims that these structures served as mortuary
houses are summarily dismissed, and the author observes that where burials do
occur they are usually secondary. In keeping with the varied architectural
repertoire, date, associations and material practices of these constructions, a
diversity of roles and functions is postulated.
The book ends with a consideration of the reconstruction of timber circles,
finally leading to the most anomalous of all such monuments, Stonehenge. This
is effectively an historical survey of timber circle research, from Squadron
Leader Insall’s discovery of Woodhenge in 1925 onwards, reviewing the way in
which the structural format of these monuments has been interpreted –
essentially a dialogue between prehistorians, excavated evidence and changing
interpretive fashions. The long running debates over roofed versus
free-standing or lintelled post arrangements are covered, the roof finally
coming off when Gibson brings in his own experience of reconstructing the
Sarn-y-bryn-caled circle (lintelled, of course).
The title of the book might strike many as odd, in that Stonehenge – or at
least that of the sarsen and bluestone settings of phase 3 that adorn the cover
and constitute most people’s image of the monument – is not a timber circle.
Furthermore, discussion of Stonehenge takes up less than ten percent of the
book (though to the cynic, the inclusion of that magic name on the cover must
help sales!). But there is logic here. Stonehenge has its timber settings, in
the form of some at least of the Aubrey Holes and the phase 2 posts (though not
necessarily arranged in circles), while the sarsen and earlier bluestone
trilithons of phase 3 copy timber constructions. The point is well made that
Stonehenge is not a stone circle, but a multiple timber circle in stone. The
dressed stones and employment of mortice and tenon joints show this famous
monument to be part of a ‘well-founded and established tradition’ of timber
circle construction.
It is therefore curious and rather amiss that no reference is made to Mike
Parker Pearson and Ramilisonina’s 1998 Antiquity paper ‘Stonehenge for
the ancestors’. In this, it is argued that an intimate metaphorical link
existed in the later Neolithic between wood (a living and transitory material)
and the living, and stone (a resilient and ‘timeless’ substance) and the
ancestral dead. Timber circles become monuments for the living and stone
circles monuments for the ancestors. Whether one agrees wholly with this scheme
or not, it does provide a compelling explanation for the use of timber and
stone in contemporary and structurally similar monuments, and for the
‘lithicisation’ of timber circles. Gibson instead perceives the change from
timber to stone as marking ‘a fundamental change in the religious practices of
the population’ (p.57). Contrasting the often closed, ‘exclusive’ and spatially
complex architecture of timber circles with the open format of those in stone,
he is at pains to stress that timber circles are not proto-types for stone
circles, except, of course, at Stonehenge. But what if stone circles are
commemorative or explicitly ancestral constructions, and both these and timber
circles are linked by a unifying materiality?
So how does this new edition differ from the first? In many respects, the
changes are not great, comprising for the most part a revision and updating of
the text, and the inclusion of a few extra illustrations. The bibliography is,
however, substantially expanded; and certain new discoveries have been added to
the very useful gazetteer, including the simple ring on Boscombe Down, near
Salisbury (excavated in 2005), and the remarkable Holme-next-the-Sea
circle/palisade with inverted tree stump (‘Seahenge’). The latter is an
important discovery since the first edition, though perhaps unjustly dismissed
here as an eroded round barrow. The existence of such of monument could hardly
have been anticipated, and one wonders what other surprises will appear before
the next edition of this book.
Joshua Pollard
University of Bristol
References
Bradley, R. & Sheridan, A. 2005. Croft Moraig and the chronology of stone
circles. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 71, 269-81
Parker Pearson, M. & Ramilisonina 1998. Stonehenge for the ancestors: the
stones pass on the message. Antiquity 72, 308-26
Review Submitted: April 2006
The views expressed in
this review are not necessarily those of the Society or the Reviews
Editor.
|