Fertile Ground, Papers in Honour of Susan Limbrey, eds. D.N. Smith, M.B., Brickley, & W. Smith
Oxford, Oxbow Books, 2005. 164 pages; 64 illustrations and plates; ISBN 1 84217 144 5 (£35)
Fertile Ground comprises a collection of 15 papers by
23 contributors which originated in an Association for Environmental
Archaeologists (AEA) meeting held in 2000 to mark the occasion of Susan
Limbrey’s retirement. As described in the introduction, Professor Limbrey’s
contribution to archaeology has been impressive, notably on the advancement of
our understanding of sediments and soils and their relationship to human
activity. Her interests and subjects taught as lecturer in Environmental
Archaeology at the University of Birmingham were broad however, so it is
fitting that this volume covers a wide range of environmental archaeology
themes.
The first paper, by Brickley, Smith and Smith, differs from the subsequent, in
providing an overview of the state of environmental archaeology in Britain
following circulation of to a questionnaire to some practitioners in the
subject. They suggest integration with ‘mainstream’ archaeology and the number
of projects in which environmental specialists are involved from the outset has
increased in recent years and that the appointment of English Heritage Regional
Advisors has had a significant role in this. However, the respondents also felt
that smaller field units struggle to adequately provide for environmental
issues, particularly in project design and make suggestions on the use of
standards. The authors go on to consider issues of funding and training, and
note that although field units cannot apply for research funding, their
respondents felt these units have a role to play, perhaps through closer
working with universities, clearly a topic which requires further debate to
enable the field to move forward as a profession.
The subsequent papers fall into several broad themes. Alluvial geoarchaeology
and palaeoenvironments are considered by Brown et al. who present
preliminary pollen, and insect findings for Lateglacial interstadial to
Holocene floodplain sediments filling an Upper Palaeolithic age palaeochannel
in the Lugg Valley near Hereford and consider vegetation change over this
transitional and rarely well-represented period. Druce investigates Holocene
sea level changes in the Severn Estuary through the study of dated peat layers,
which though often non-planar and discontinuous in this area may provide useful
data on trends in regional marine regression and transgression. Greenwood and
Smith use insect data to reconstruct aspects of the fluvial landscape from
several discontinuous sequences of the Trent Valley and in so doing are able to
provide hope for those working in such spatially variable fluvial landscapes to
provide long-term records of landscape change.
Readers with an interest in soil science are well catered for, with papers by
Canti who reminds us of the importance of worms in soil formation, sorting and
sometimes mucking up site stratigraphy and Guttman et al. who provide
a review of the evidence for manuring from the Neolithic onwards and describe a
wide range of manure types used and their relationship to the process of
intensification of agriculture. Usai describes the use of textural pedofeatures
in examining past cultivation and concludes they tend to occur in sequences
unaffected by cultivation and rarely below it, contrary to the assumption that
the two are directly related and that they should not, therefore, be considered
diagnostic. Matthews provides an interesting account of some of her
micromorphological findings for floor and midden layers at the Neolithic site
of Çatalhöyük, Turkey. She urges the integration of good field observations,
the study of microstratigraphy and other environmental techniques with artefact
studies in providing the full archaeological picture.
Faunal studies include those of Brothwell who addresses the topic of tame
wolves and dogs and proposes a Palaeolithic origin for domestication, with
fully domesticated forms arriving in the Americas early, differentiating into
disparate types over the Holocene. Kenward provides an overview of the evidence
for honeybees in archaeological deposits and suggests possible beekeeping in
10th century York, a thoughtful and detailed addition to Susan Limbrey’s 1982
paper, while Robinson casts a fresh eye over the beetle work undertaken by
Girling in the Somerset Levels. Redfern and Roberts provide the sole human bone
study, they utilise large data sets from cemeteries in major urban conurbations
to examine the health implications of 2nd-4th Romano-British urban living.
Landscape, notably woodland, topics are also addressed. Hall looks at 19th-20th
century woodland management, leaf-foddering and the indirect effects of changes
in the nature and intensity of agriculture in the Pindos Mountains of NW Greece
using a useful mix of oral histories, aerial photographs, vegetation transects
and tree-ring analyses (although little of her primary data is presented in
this volume). Heathcote on late Holocene landscape changes on the island of
Nevis in the Eastern Caribbean examines the relationship between large-scale
changes in land-use and settlement patterns with the archaeological evidence
for landscape division over the last 500 years and the spatial distribution of
landforms, soil types and sediments on the island, providing an admirably
holistic approach to examining the nature of human impact on the landscape,
notably soil erosion. Smith and Whitehouse consider the contribution of insect
data to the study of early to mid Holocene woodland composition and discuss the
likelihood of greater biodiversity and complexity than previously proposed.
Overall the papers are wide-ranging, with something for everyone. Several are
necessarily short and some without the original data but this is no bad thing,
making the volume very readable. Full bibliographies will allow those with
particular interests to research those topics further. It’s a good read for all
environmental archaeologists and hopefully for many outside will also find this
an interesting review of some of the current issues and the direct contribution
of palaeoenvironmental and geoarchaeological work to archaeology.
Catherine Chisham
Wessex Archaeology
Reference
Limbrey, S. 1982. The Honeybee and Woodland Resources. In Bell, M. and Limbrey,
S. (eds) Archaeological Aspects of Woodland Ecology. Oxford: British
Archaeological Reports International Series 146, 279-286
Review Submitted: January 2006
The views expressed in
this review are not necessarily those of the Society or the Reviews
Editor.
|