Safonfok, Kosrae: Emergence of Complexity - An archaeological investigation of prehistoric settlement in East Micronesia by FELICIA BEARDSLEY
BAR International Series 1366. 2005. 118 pages, 31 figures, 5 tables. ISBN 1 84171 808 4 (£27)
This volume is essentially a site report detailing the excavation of the
prehistoric monumental site of Safonfok on Kosrae Island in Mirconesia,
occupied from around A.D. 1200 to 1600. The subtitle to the book, ‘emergence of
complexity’ does not however, live up to expectation. The major findings of the
fieldwork at Kosrae was the recovery of a deeper than expected cultural deposit
and a number of fish hooks and fish hook blanks made from coral. The real
strength of this book is the material culture analysis which provides an
interesting insight into the range of tools and items used in this part of the
Pacific in late Prehistory. Its major weakness is that it tries to do too much
and falls short of the huge array of research questions served up in the third
chapter.
The book is divided into six chapters and follows tradition beginning with a
detailed account of the current environment, ecology and environmental history
of the island. There is plenty of background information here to provide a
sense of place, which is likely to be unfamiliar to many readers. The second
part of this section incorporates a detailed, and interesting, section of oral
histories and historic observations made at the time of western observation, if
not contact, that begins in the sixteenth century. Detailed observation of
island life and archaeology is initiated in 1910 with the arrival of the German
South Seas Expedition.
Following the background sections is the research design and the rationale
behind selection of the research questions, which they refer to as ‘research
domains’ (page 24). I found this section to be a bit long-winded, posed a large
number of interesting research questions, but ultimately delivered on few. In
several places the text on research methods reads more like a first year
instructional manual, rather than a clear, concise statement on what was
attempted, why, and how they will achieve the objectives stated. The whole
could have been much shorter, but its published form may stem from the history
of the project as field training for student archaeologists, reflecting their
important involvement throughout all phases of the work.
Fieldwork was conducted in 1999 and 2001 in combination with students and
archaeological staff on the island who mapped surface features and cleared
vegetation. In some places here the text reads a bit more like an adventure
story rather than a discussion of what was achieved. With little to go on,
would they find anything worth excavating? How disturbed was the site? Would
the team prevail? I guess I shouldn’t complain too much, as archaeology can get
a bit on the dry side, however, I found the conversational tone a bit
irritating by the end. The fieldwork section, written as a chronological
narrative (which I also found frustrating) suffers, unfortunately, from some
poor graphic reproduction and a few mistakes. The main site plan (figure 11,
page 33) is difficult to read and the scale is such that excavation squares are
too small and cryptic and the internal numbering system impossible to resolve.
Figure 17 on page 42 suffers the same problem. The black & white
photographs on page 36 are likewise a bit cryptic, and it is very hard to
discern the important features. These could have benefited with some
instructive labelling. I am sure that figure 14 (page 38) suffers from a
typographic error in the scale which is given in metres rather than
centimetres? Table 1 lists the excavation units (squares) on page 39 but only
shows squares excavated during 2001. Units from 1999 are not listed here though
they appear in figure 11. A larger organising system termed ‘Blocks’ is also
mentioned here, but does not figure on any plan, even though they become the
major zones of excavation.
A wide range of material was recovered from the rich cultural deposits of
Kosrae that included coral fish hooks, Tridacna sp. and Terebra
sp. shell adzes, Lambis sp. drills, fishing related equipment
including sinkers and net weights, shell beads, shell scrapers, and coral
abraders. The discussion of the material culture recovered is detailed,
particularly that relating to fishing technology and the shell adzes, and shell
beads. Enough material was recovered from these excavations to demonstrate that
coral fish hooks and shell adzes were all in production at the site, and a
valuable collection of material showing all stages in the manufacture of shell
beads was also recovered. This section is nicely detailed and will definitely
be of value to scholars in this area of research. A great deal is made of the
recovery of fish hooks made from coral – the first time this has occurred in an
archaeological excavation – and subsequent claims to raise Kosrae to the status
of a ‘type site’ in the region. A point that was repeated so many times
throughout the text it ended up sounding more like a plea than a statement. And
while the premier find of the site is interesting, coral fish hooks are known
from historical documents (page 44), and apparently made from every other
conceivable material including wood, bone, tooth, tusk, shell, turtle carapace,
plant thorns, insect parts, stone, coconut shell and iron (page 44). So why not
coral? And what does this actually say about the emergence of complexity?
One of the main sticking points of this monograph for me was the attempt to
blend ethnography with archaeology into a seamless historical narrative about
Safonfok and its role in the wider Pacific world. It remains unclear to me
whether the author puts more weight in the interpretation of historical
information, which includes oral histories or in the recovery of material from
the archaeological excavation. A pre-built ethnographic model of site function
lurks throughout. Oral history and ethnography is used to interpret structural
remains and artefact function, such as a chopper and mortar (page 57)
interpreted as the tools of skilled artisan practicing medicine (page 63). The
information on tool function came direct from a local informant who remembered
the function of a similar object by his grandmother (page 57). While important
to record and interesting, one is surely on dangerous ground if this
information is fed, uncritically, straight back into interpretation of, not
just artefact but site function, as was done here. In the final chapter
Safonfok is interpreted as a high status site (based partly on the archaeology
and primarily on historic information), and seen as the focal point of
political and religious power which ‘controlled production industries and other
proprietary knowledge (such as medicine)’ (page 65). What if this object was
not actually used for the production of medicine? In fact, the archaeology
becomes relatively unimportant as historic narrative is used to support itself
in a closed loop (items such as medicine stones are even pre-empted on page 26
under ‘Research Objectives’) and archaeology remains the handmaid of history.
There are other examples of this practice involving the major structural
elements of the site, such as spaces interpreted as rooms to house artisans and
foreign dignitaries (page 65). Which is a shame, and I am sure not what the
author intended. I think the book is a brave attempt to incorporate the rich
history and living culture of Kosrae into an archaeological interpretation of
the past, giving voice and validity to the current inhabitants of the island. I
just don’t think you can do this in practice. No matter how much you want
someone to own their past, archaeology needs its own theoretical space in which
to operate. Short-term social histories may not be an appropriate analogy, even
if the site is only 800 to 400 years old.
In dealing with the major archaeological remains in Chapter 5, I also get a
sense that frequency is mistakenly associated with importance or value. At
Safonfok stone artefacts occur in low frequency (ignoring the stone used in
construction) such that we read ‘Stone was not a raw material of choice; marine
resources such as coral and shell were’ (page 58). However, the ‘medicine
chopper and mortar’ were made from basalt, as was a unique triangular backed
knife (pages 57-58). Maybe stone was a material of choice – it just functioned
in a different social realm than marine resources that were used for more
utilitarian functions?
In several places in the text we are told that ‘archaeology is not conducted in
a vacuum’ which is good news for those of us that breathe oxygen, though you
may find yourself needing some in places – perhaps this is a site report that
tries to do too much. It never really address its own sub-title ‘the emergence
of complexity’ with only two paragraphs devoted to this topic at the very end
of the book. The description of the site and of the material recovered is well
handled (despite the limitations of the figures), and the site clearly contains
a rich material record that is well dated, and will be of interest to anyone
working in the region.
Huw Barton
University of Leicester
Review Submitted: October 2005
The views expressed in
this review are not necessarily those of the Society or the Reviews
Editor.
|