Press Releases

Twitter iconYouTube iconFacebook iconSoundCloud

Call us: +44 (0)20 7679 9041

The UCL Media Relations team is the university’s central press office.

We connect journalists to expert academics and promote UCL research and teaching throughout the global media.

More contact information

UCL Constitution Unit comments on Lords reform ahead of Commons vote

Publication date: Mar 6, 2007 2:49:45 PM

With MPs about to vote on Lords reform, the UCL Constitution Unit emphasises that the chamber is already becoming more assertive – even without elections being introduced.

Senior Research Fellow Dr Meg Russell says: “With all the talk about reform a false impression is created that the House of Lords hasn’t changed. In fact it changed significantly when the majority of hereditaries were removed in 1999, and is challenging government more frequently and with growing confidence. Elections would probably make it stronger still. But whatever the outcome of tomorrow’s votes, the balance of power at Westminster has already shifted. It is a mistake to see the Lords as “unreformed”: it is a very different institution to what it was.”

The government has been defeated in the Lords over 350 times since 1999. In a report published last month on the work of the Lords in 2006, the Unit charted how it won major policy concessions, for example on ID cards, religious hatred and the merging of criminal justice inspectorates. In a lecture at the Australian Senate in December, Meg Russell outlined how it has strengthened over time.

Meg Russell said: “In 1999 some feared that removing the hereditary peers would emasculate the opposition in the House of Lords, but in fact the opposite seems to have happened. Because the chamber is now more politically balanced its confidence to challenge government is growing, and the Liberal Democrats in particular are gaining influence. Developments this year show that the Lords is working increasingly effectively with elements in the Commons to win policy concessions.”

The outcome of tomorrow’s votes is uncertain. In 2003 all seven reform options were rejected, and the same could happen again. But whatever happens, there are some reforms that should be implemented and which all parties should be able to agree. For example the white paper suggested:

· Cleaning up appointments, so that prime ministerial patronage is ended and more power given to the independent Appointments Commission.

· Ending the link between the peerage and membership of the House, making clear it is a job, not an honour.

· Allowing members of the chamber to retire, so that its membership is regularly renewed.

There will be no votes on these issues tomorrow, but they could go ahead even if all major reform options are again rejected by MPs. UCL Constitution Unit Director Robert Hazell said “The Lords has already been strengthened by “minor” reform in 1999, and reforms to enhance public trust in the appointment process, and end the lure of a title which brings some people into the House who make little contribution, would help strengthen it further. These are key proposals and must not be lost, whatever else MPs decide. Government has not committed firmly to this, and it must.’

Notes to Editors

Dr Meg Russell and Professor Robert Hazell are available for interview, and to offer a clear and objective guide through the maze of Lords reform, and the politics of the votes.

· Dr Meg Russell is author of Reforming the House of Lords: Lessons from Overseas (Oxford University Press, 2000) and numerous reports and papers on the Lords. She was also special adviser to Robin Cook when the votes took place in 2003.

· Professor Robert Hazell is Director of the Constitution Unit.

· The Constitution Unit is a specialist think tank working on the implementation of constitutional reform. It is independent and non-partisan, based in the School of Public Policy at University College London. For details of the Unit’s research on the Lords see:

· The report The House of Lords in 2006: Negotiating a Stronger Second Chamber by Meg Russell and Maria Sciara (January 2007) is available for purchase at £10.00. Please contact Victoria Spence (

· The lecture to the Australian Senate is available online at the above website address.