Skip to main content
UCL Logo Navigate back to homepage

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Study

    Study

    • Study at UCL
    • Prospective students
    • Current students
    • Accommodation
    • Careers
    • Doctoral School
    • Immigration and visas
    • Student finances
    • Support and wellbeing
  • Research

    Research

    • Research at UCL
    • Engage with us
    • Explore our Research
    • Initiatives and networks
    • Research news
  • Engage

    Engage

    • Engage with UCL
    • Alumni
    • Business partnerships and collaboration
    • Global engagement
    • News and Media relations
    • Policy and political engagement
    • Schools and priority groups
    • Give to UCL
  • About

    About

    • About UCL
    • Who we are
    • Faculties
    • Governance
    • President and Provost
    • Strategy
    • UCL's Bicentenary
  • UCL Logo Active parent page: UCL Faculty of Laws
    • About us
    • Study
    • Short Courses
    • Active parent page: Research
    • People
    • Alumni
    • News
    • Events

Interdigital v Lenovo: FRAND rates between mutually unwilling parties

By Professor Sir Robin Jacob and Dheemanth Vangimalla

Frand cases in context cover

Breadcrumb trail

  • Faculty of Laws

Faculty menu

  • Current page: Publications
    • Policy Briefs

Breadcrumb trail

  • Faculty of Laws
  • Research
  • Interdigital v Lenovo: FRAND rates between mutually unwilling parties

Publication details 

Robin Jacob and Dheemanth Vangimalla, ‘Interdigital v Lenovo: FRAND rates between mutually unwilling parties’ in Jorge Contreras (ed), FRAND Cases in Context (2026, Edward Elgar).

Abstract

InterDigital v Lenovo is the second case in which the English courts have determined a global FRAND royalty rate for a SEP portfolio. This was the first case in which the issues of principle as to the correct treatment of past sales by implementers have been raised for determination. Both the High Court and the Court of Appeal confirmed that limitation periods do not apply when assessing FRAND terms, and that interest is owed on past sales under such terms. The English courts once again confirmed the jurisdiction’s willingness and ability to thoroughly examine and engage with valuation evidence and methodologies. Overall, the decisions in InterDigital v Lenovo reinforce the forum’s reputation for being balanced and robust when it comes to setting global FRAND terms.

This chapter is an open access title available under the terms of a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License. It is free to read, download and share via Elgaronline.

UCL footer

Visit

  • Bloomsbury Theatre and Studio
  • Library, Museums and Collections
  • UCL Maps
  • UCL Shop
  • Contact UCL

Students

  • Accommodation
  • Current Students
  • Moodle
  • Students' Union

Staff

  • Inside UCL
  • Staff Intranet
  • Work at UCL
  • Human Resources
UCL Logo

University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7679 2000

UCL social media menu

  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Youtube
  • Link to TikTok
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Bluesky
  • Link to Threads
  • Link to Soundcloud
Here, it can happen.
Back to top

Essential

  • Disclaimer
  • Freedom of Information
  • Accessibility
  • Cookies
  • Privacy
  • Slavery statement
  • Log in

© 2026 UCL