XClose

UCL Faculty of Laws

Home
Menu

Research by Dr Martins Paparinskis cited by the Colombian Constitutional Court

8 July 2019

The research was cited by the Colombian Constitutional Court in Judgment C-252/19 regarding constitutionality of the Colombia-France Bilateral Investment Treaty

Martins Paparinskis

Research by Dr Martins Paparinskis, Reader in Public International Law at UCL Faculty of Laws, was cited by the Colombian Constitutional Court in Judgment C-252/19 of 6 June 2019, made public last week (in Spanish).

Judgment C-252/19 is one of the most awaited Court’s judgments in 2019 and concerns a challenge of constitutionality of the 2014 Colombia-France Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) and its 2017 ratifying law. The Court had to consider the compatibility of the national treatment and most-favoured-nation treatment provisions in the BIT with the Colombian Constitution. It explained the structure and content of these provisions by reference to a chapter by Dr Paparinskis in CL Lim, J Ho, and M Paparinskis, International Investment Law and Arbitration: Commentary, Awards and other Materials (Cambridge University Press 2018) at [230], [239]. The Court also relied on the same chapter to make a general point about the relationship of non-discrimination rules in constitutional law and international investment law at [112]. (Elsewhere in the judgment, the Court cited a chapter from the same book by Professor Lim on fair and equitable treatment, at [192], [197], [211].)

Judgment C-252/19 is the second citation by a leading domestic court of Dr Paparinskis’ research from this book, following the Singapore Court of Appeal’s Swissbourgh Diamond Mines (Pty) Limited & Ors v Kingdom of Lesotho [2018] SGCA 81 judgement last November.