Dynamic Competition Analysis in Competition Law: Beyond Slogans
A workshop organised by the Centre for Law, Economics and Society, UCL
About the workshop
The European Commission’s (Commission) decision to revise the Merger Guidelines comes at a moment when several economic and political developments put pressures on competition authorities worldwide.
Integrating more dynamic effects analysis into merger control has been put forward as an important dimension of the EU merger reform.
The concept of ‘dynamic competition’ regroups a number of theories that might be distinguished from the ‘static competition model’. The static approach, to which dynamic competition is often contrasted, traditionally centered on current market shares and short-term price effects. This has been increasingly criticized in the literature for failing to recognize innovation’s pivotal role in shaping long-term market dynamics and consumer welfare.
Dynamic competition theories, in contrast, emphasize how mergers may influence innovation, future market entry and expansion, and structural changes - effects that are critical in sectors like AI, fintech, and other rapidly innovating industries where disruptive forces and high entry barriers prevail. A common characteristic of these different theories of ‘dynamic competition’ is that they all focus on innovation as a key component of the competitive process.
Dynamic effects can also be said to refer to the long-term impacts of a merger on market innovation, technological progress, entry and expansion, and future competition—not just effects on current market shares or prices. This assessment is crucial in sectors where products are rapidly evolving (e.g. AI tools or fintech), or where entry barriers are high, but R&D is the main competitive driver or where disruptive innovation may be stifled (e.g. in killer acquisitions).
A different, broader than the two previous ones, concept of ‘dynamic’ relates to the analysis of the departure from standard neoclassical price theory models that rely on static partial equilibrium or even general equilibrium thinking and simplify complex, heterogeneous market realities using representative firm or consumer constructs. Other approaches engage with the economic process modelled as a dynamic system of interacting agents taking into account nonlinear dynamics and disruption theory, to uncover the ‘dynamic complexity’ of these interactions and focus not only on the level but also the direction of innovation. For more analysis, see the study of the CLES team here
The workshop will engage with the meaning and operationalization of dynamic competition in competition law and policy, the different approaches and methodologies put forward in various areas of social sciences focusing on innovation and dynamic competition, and the lessons to be learnt for the drafting of the guidelines and for competition law enforcement.
This event is supported by
13:00 - 13:15 Registration and arrival
13.15 – 15.20 Panel 1 will define the scope of "dynamic analysis" and map the various research trajectories regarding dynamic analysis in competition law and policy - essentially creating a topography of current research programs, in IO, innovation economics, evolutionary economics, innovation studies (SPRU), business strategy …
Chair: Ioannis Lianos, UCL
Antonio Andreoni, SOAS
Cristina Caffarra, UCL (online)
Luise Eisfeld, HEC Lausanne & Swiss Finance Institute
Dario Guarascio, Sapienza University of Rome - Dept. of Economics and Law (online)
Martin Schmalz, Said Business School, Oxford (online)
Howard Shelanski, Georgetown University (online)
David Teece, Berkeley Haas School of Business (online)
Flavio Toxvaerd, University of Cambridge (online)
15.25 – 17.10 Panel 2 will address operational concepts, methodologies, and metrics for conducting dynamic analysis, exploring approaches such as dynamic capabilities and innovation ecosystems and how these may be implemented in the EU merger guidelines
Chair: Ioannis Lianos, UCL
Nick Economides, NYU Stern Business School (online)
Germain Gaudin, University of Freiburg (online)
Matthew Johnson, OXERA
Aviv Nevo, University of Pennsylvania (online)
Oliver Latham, CRA
Cecilia Nardini, Compass Lexecon
Matias Pietola, Chief economist team, European Commission
Ana Sofia Rodriquez, Portuguese Competition Authority (online)
17.15 – 18.30 Panel 3 will examine the current state of the law and case studies (from merger control or other ex-ante interventions – e.g. open banking) to understand how current decision-making has integrated (or insufficiently incorporated) dynamic competition analysis, consider what might have differed with a "dynamic competition" analysis, and discuss policy suggestions like Draghi's proposed innovation defense, the emphasis put on potential competition, the future of the Towercast case law and call in powers and how the law engages with both the level and the direction of innovation (responsible innovation).
Chair: Jacques Steenbergen, KU Leuven
Daniele Calisti, DG Comp, European Commission (online)
Nikita Divissenko, Utrecht University
Eleanor Fox, NYU (online)
Gonenc Gurkaynak, ELIG & UCL
Ioannis Lianos, UCL
Stavros Makris, UCL
Deni Mantzari, UCL
Fiona Scott Morton, Yale School of Management (online)
Standard ticket = £10
Academics / Full time Students / Public Sector or Government workers = free of charge
Book your place at:
https://ucl-dynamic-competition-analysis.eventbrite.co.uk/
Online tickets - free of charge
BOOK ONLINE TICKET
Further information
Ticketing
Pre-booking essential
Cost
£10.00
Open to
All