Certainty-Based Marking (CBM)

Certainty-based or Confidence-based marking (in various forms) is many decades old. It has repeatedly been shown to stimulate more careful thinking and learning than simple (right/wrong) marking, and to provide more reliable assessments. LAPT aims to provide the best possible implementation of CBM as a learning tool, for open use.

What is Certainty-Based Marking (CBM)?

conf Why use CBM?  How does it work?

marks at each C level

When should I use the different certainty levels?

best choice graph

"Confidence" or Certainty"?

I switched from talking about CBM as "Confidence-based marking" to "Certainty-based marking" in 2005. "Certainty" seems to carry less inappropriate baggage than "Confidence" - which sometimes suggests to people that confident or brash personalities are being rewarded. This is not so! Those who are rewarded are those who can distinguish between reliable and unreliable answers. Successful people acknowledge uncertainty when they encounter it, and this how they gain in self-confidence. In the context of "How certain are you that this answer is right?" or "How confident are you that this is right?", the two terms are equivalent. But "Certainty-Based Marking" is (I hope!) less open to misinterpretation.

I have resurrected for the web an early classic review of some of the relevant concepts by Andrew Ahlgren (1969)

Time-saving tips
Further Discussion:    Publications            Problems, queries, suggestions:   mail to cusplap@ucl.ac.uk            Go to Top of Page