Schools serving high poverty communities need funding that fully reflects the work that they do

Our project, Learning Through Disruption, also shows that schools have a particularly vital role in addressing the needs of high poverty communities, both directly and indirectly. Yet this work goes largely unrecognised and underfunded. This needs to change.

Findings

Schools are a vital source of support for children living in poverty

In many ways, schools are at the frontline in dealing with deficiencies in the current welfare system that place children living in poverty at risk. During lockdown, schools monitored the wellbeing of children intensely, using regular phone calls and visiting the homes of the most vulnerable children not on site.

Schools were also crucial in providing safe spaces for families affected by domestic violence and inadequate temporary accommodation. Without this active support, many vulnerable children would have been left at considerable risk during lockdowns. In many ways, schools are the place families turn to when there is nowhere else to go.

Schools serving high-poverty populations face greater challenges in meeting the depth of their needs

The pandemic made clear that poverty has material impacts on children’s lives, whether through basic food insecurity, poor housing, lack of basic necessities such as clothing or digital poverty which limited opportunities to access remote learning. 

While all schools did what they could to address issues facing individuals, schools serving high poverty areas faced bigger challenges in helping their communities through the crisis. Many had to rely on a patchwork of charitable support to help ensure pupils stayed fed: This highlights deficiencies in the welfare system that require urgent repair.

Pupil Premium funding does not adequately match changing levels of need

Although schools were able to help the most vulnerable in their communities during the crisis, this role is not adequately resourced. Pupil Premium funding is based on eligibility for Free School Meals (FSM), a relatively crude measure. In the context of the pandemic, changing the date when eligibility for FSM is calculated has compounded these funding issues (Thomson, 2021).

Several of our case study schools noted that some of the hardest-hit families were those who had lost jobs due to the Covid crisis. Parents who had been furloughed or had reduced hours of work were suddenly dealing with financial insecurity, and turning to schools to help them through.

The pandemic should act as a prompt for a review of how schools dealing with children living in poverty can be properly resourced to meet their communities’ needs.

Recommendations

Funding should be more clearly weighted towards schools operating in areas of highest disadvantage.

This will enable them more easily to address the multiple impacts material
poverty has on children’s education.

Current metrics to determine funding for schools operating in areas of multiple disadvantage are inadequate.

FSM entitlement is not capable of capturing the complexity of local needs that impact on pupils’ educational functioning.

Only a joined-up strategy to end child poverty in England will enable all children to reach their educational potential.

Schools’ role in picking up the damage poverty causes should be recognised and funded.

Learning through disruption rebuilding primary education using local knowledge

Funder: Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).

Professor Gemma Moss, Professor Alice Bradbury, Dr Annette Braun, Dr Sam Duncan, Dr Rachael Levy

Links

• Download the research briefing from UCL Discovery (PDF)