Welcome to the UCL European Institute, UCL's hub for research, collaboration and information on Europe and the European Union.
UCL European Institute
- Current Projects
- Media Gallery
In their relationship to Europe, both Britain and Romania are situated at the continent’s edge, but that is where any list of comparisons between the two countries usually ends. Certainly, both countries are members of the European Union, but their respective responses to the European Union differ markedly. Polls conducted by Eurobarometer consistently put Romanians among the most enthusiastic supporters of the European Union, and the British (along with the Greeks) among the least. But what are the historical roots of Romanian and British attitudes towards Europe and the European idea?
27 July 2015
Prof. Martyn Rady More...
Starts: Jul 27, 2015 12:00:00 AM
Young people in the UK today who are attracted to extremism are typically well educated. Given the weaknesses of this ideology in terms of its use of history, internal coherence of arguments and moral standards, its success with many educated young people requires explanation. The explanation, according to Dr. Farid, is multifaceted but education has a big role to play in curbing the trend.
2 June 2015
Dr. Farid Panjwani More...
Starts: Jun 2, 2015 12:00:00 AM
Christopher Bickerton, lecturer in Politics at the University of Cambridge, discusses how how the impending EU referendum in the UK necessitates open and unbiased academic debate, and how British discussions of EU reform may reverberate across the European continent.
15 May 2015
Dr. Christopher Bickerton More...
Starts: May 15, 2015 12:00:00 AM
The Margin of Appreciation
|This section gathers resources in relation to the lecture by Dean Spielmann, President of the European Court of Human Rights, on the Margin of Appreciation doctrine. Note: the lecture will be published in Current Legal Problems, volume 67, 2014.|
1. POLICY BRIEFING
policy briefing discusses the margin of appreciation doctrine; a very
prominent instrument which is used to allow states room for manoeuver in
the manner in which they apply some of the provisions of the European
Convention on Human Rights. This policy briefing provides an overview
• The content and functions of the doctrine;
• Its origins in the European Court of Human Rights' case law;
• The likely future of the margin of appreciation doctrine
2. BIBLIOGRAPHY AND ONLINE RESOURCES
For a general overview of the margin of appreciation doctrine, see:
- Council of Europe, ‘The Margin of Appreciation’
- S Greer, ‘The Margin of Appreciation: Interpretation and Discretion under the European Convention on Human Rights’, Council of Europe Human Rights File No 17, July 2000
For a critical overview of current debates in relation to the margin of appreciation in the UK, see:
- G Letsas, ‘Lord Sumption’s Attack on Strasbourg: More Than Political Rhetoric?’ UK Constitutional Law Blog, 09.12.2013 and UCL European Institute Comment, December 2013.
- Lord Neuberger, ‘The British and Europe’ Cambridge Freshfields Annual Law Lecture 2014, 12 February 2014
- Lord Justice Laws, 'The Common Law and Europe', Hamlyn Lectures 2013, Lecture III, 27 November 2013
- Lord Sumption, ‘The Limits of Law’, 27th Sultan Azlan Shah Lecture, Kuala Lumpur, 20 November 2013
- D Spielmann, ‘Allowing the right margin. The European Court of Human Rights and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine: Waiver or Subsidiarity of European Review?’ University of Cambridge, CELS Working Paper, February 2012
- G Letsas, ‘The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and its Legitimacy’ (March 14, 2012)
- B Hale, ‘Argentoratum Locutum: Is the Strasbourg or the Supreme Court Supreme?’ (2012) 12: 1 Human Rights Law Review 65
- N Bratza, ‘The Relationship Between the UK Courts and Strasbourg’ (2011) 5 European Human Rights Law Review 505
- D Spielmann, ‘En jouant sur les marges. La Cour européenne des droits de l’homme et la théorie de la marge d’appréciation nationale: abandon ou subsidiarité du contrôle européen?’ (2010) Actes de la Section des Sciences Morales et Politiques, Vol. XIII, 203
- G Letsas, ‘Strasbourg’s Interpretive Ethic: Lessons for the International Lawyer’, (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 1
- K Cavanaugh, ‘Policing The Margins: Rights Protection And The European Court Of Human Rights’ (2006) 4 European Human Rights Law Review 422
- G Letsas, ‘Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation’ (2006) 26 (4) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 705
- J A Brauch, ‘The margin of Appreciation and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Threat to the Rule of law’, (2004) 11:1 Columbia Journal of European Law 113
- E Benvenisti, ‘Margin of appreciation, consensus, and universal standards’ (1998) 31 NYU Journal of International Law & Politics 843
- Lord Lester of Herne Hill, ‘Universality versus Subsidiarity: A Reply’ (1998) 1 European Human Rights Law Review 73
- P Mahoney, ‘Universality versus Subsidiarity’ (1997) 4 European Human Rights Law Review 364
- E Brems, ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights’ (1996) Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 240
IV. Books and book chapters
- D Spielmann, M Tsirli and P Voyatzis (eds), The European Convention on Human Rights, a living instrument, Essays in Honour of Christos L. Rozakis (Bruylant, 2011)
- G Letsas, A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (2nd edn, OUP 2009), with a foreword by Judge Spielmann
- Y Arai-Takahashi, The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Intersentia 2002)
- J Callewaert, ‘Quel avenir pour la marge d’appréciation ?’ in P Mahoney, F Matscher, H Petzold and L Wildhaber (eds), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective. Studies in memory of Rolv Ryssdal (Carl Heymanns Verlag 2000)
- P Lambert, ‘Marge nationale d’appréciation et contrôle de proportionnalité’, in F Sudre (ed), L’interprétation de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme (Bruylant 1998) 63.
- H C Yourow, The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence (Kluwer 1996)
V. Selected case law
- Lawless v. Ireland (App no 332/57) judgment of 01.07.1961
- Case "Relating to certain aspects of the laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium" v. Belgium (App no 1474/62, 1677/62, 1691/62, 1769/63, 1994/63, 2126/64), 23.07.1968
- Handyside v. The United Kingdom (App no 5493/72), 7.12.1976
- Engel and others v. The United Kingdom (App no 5101/71, 5354/72, 5102/71, 5370/72), 8.06.1976.
- Ireland v. The United Kingdom (App no 5310/71), 18.01.1978
- Klass and others v. Germany (App no 5029/71) 06.09.1978
- Sunday Times v The United Kingdom (App no 6538/74), 26.04.1979
- Marckx v. Belgium (App no 6833/74), 13.06.1979
- X and Y v. The Netherlands (App no 8978/80), 26.03.1985
- James and Others v. the United Kingdom (App no 77033/01), 21.02.1986
- Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria, App no 13470/87, 20.09.1994
- Goodwin v. The United Kingdom (App no 28957/95), 27.03.1996
- Dahlab v. Switzerland (App no 42393/98), 15.02.2001
- Fretté v. France (App no 36515/97), 26.02.2002
- Pretty v. The United Kingdom (App no 2346/02), 29.07.2002
- Von Hannover v. Germany (App no 59320/00), 24.06.2004
- Sahin v. Turkey (App no 44774/98), 29.06.2004
- Vo v. France (App no 53924/00), 8.07.2004
- Hirst v. The United Kingdom (no. 2) (App no 74025/01), 6.09.2005
- Stec and Others v. The United Kingdom (App no 65731/01, 65900/01), 12.04.2006
- Evans v. the United Kingdom (App no 6339/05), 10.04.2007
- Saadi v. Italy (App no 37201/06), 28.02.2008.
- A and others v. The United Kingdom (App no 3455/05), 19.02.2009
- A, B and C v. Ireland (App no 25579/05), 16.12.2010
- Lautsi and others v. Italy (App no 30814/06), 18.02.2011
- Von Hannover v. Germany (No 2) (App no 40660/08), 7.02.2012
- Axel Springer AG v. Germany (App no 39954/08), 7.02.2012
- Othman (Abu Qatada) v. The United Kingdom (App no 8139/09), 17.01.2012
- Eweida and others v. The United Kingdom, (App no 48420/10, 59842/10, 51671/10 and 36516/10), 15.01.2013
- Vallianatos and others v. Greece (App no 29381/09, 32684/09), 7.11.2013