Hugo GrotiusDe antiquitate reipublicae Batavicae (1610)Hugo Grotius (1583-1645), advocate-fiscal of the province of Holland, in 1610 wrote an official version of historical events leading to the foundation of the Dutch Republic as recognised by the States-General. Grotius, in #De antiquitate reipublicae Batavicae attempted to establish the continuity between the Batavians, as described by Tacitus, and the rebellious Dutch Republic warring with Spain. His main argument was that the Dutch had been a free people from ancient times onwards: free to elect their sovereign, and free to remove this same sovereign if he did not act in the best interest of the people. Based on Tacitus, Grotius worked with the assumption that:
Little had changed between the period of the Batavians and the Middle Ages:
Like in ancient ‘Batavian’ times, according to Grotius, the time before and during the Revolt against Spain also saw natural submission of the sovereign to the States.
In the 16th century, however, king Philip II chose to unilaterally ignore these long-standing institutional relation between sovereign and States. In order to preserve their freedom and their ancient rights, the Dutch were left with no option but to stand up against their sovereign. He, not the people, according to Grotius, had rebelled.
Like the Batavians had fought the Romans to remain free, the Dutch now had to wage war on the Spaniards, according to Grotius, as power belonged to the States, not to the sovereign. Yet this was only one possible way of reading Tacitus’ texts. Another political interpretation of Tacitus’description, also in the early 17th century, was put forward by the poet >Pieter Cornelisz Hooft. |