Skip to site navigation

Legislative Committees at Westminster: The Case for Reform

Legislative Committees - The Case for Reform

The legislative process in the UK House of Commons has long been criticised, in particular with relation to its committee stage. Almost uniquely amongst established, developed parliamentary democracies this is taken in non-specialist and temporary (‘public bill’) committees, rather than specialist, permanent committees. In contrast the Commons ‘select committees’, responsible for oversight of other aspects of policy, are specialist and permanent, and are well-respected.

The central objective of this project is to contribute to the evidence base in support of reform of the way in which the House of Commons deals with legislation, by investigating how legislative committees function in other jurisdictions. We will focus on how best practice can be built upon, adapted and incorporated into the British parliament. A report has been produced to inform the work of reformers, both inside and outside the House of Commons. 

This project is funded by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. The project is led by Constitution Unit Deputy Director Dr Meg Russell, and the other researchers are Dr Phil Larkin and Dr Bob Morris.

This project also shares many themes with our ongoing research into the policy impact of the British parliament, which Dr Russell is concurrently pursuing in other projects. For more information, click here.

  • The final report for this project is being launched on 10th June 2013.
  • For more information, please contact Dr Meg Russell at

•    Russell, M, Morris, B and Larkin, P Fitting the Bill: Bringing Commons Legislation Committees Into Line With Best Practice, June 2013

Fitting the bill - cover (very small)

The report summarises the perceived difficulties with current arrangements, reviews previous reform proposals, and looks for inspiration to legislation committees in other parliaments. It concludes that the House of Commons' legislation committees are increasingly out of step, not only with international best practice, but also with the chamber's own well-respected select committees. The report therefore makes proposals for reform, suggesting some immediate changes plus piloting of three different models of legislative committee.

Within days of publication of our report "Fitting the Bill: Bringing Commons Legislation Committees into Line with Best Practice", the House of Commons Procedure Committee announced a new inquiry into the constitution and membership of public bill committees. See here.

The first witnesses were the Unit's Meg Russell (lead author of the report), along with Professor Tony Wright (also of the School of Public Policy, UCL, and a former MP and chair of the Reform of the House of Commons committee 2009-10). The session made extensive reference to the report and its recommendations, discussing issues such as how members of public bill committees are chosen (and suggestions that the Committee of Selection might be reformed, and/or its proposals be put to the chamber for approval), and the merits of larger-scale reform such as moving towards permanent, specialist legislation committees of the kind that exist in many other parliaments.

You can watch the session here, and read the transcript of the evidence here

Evidence on Commons legislative committees - resized

The recommendations for changes to the membership of public bill committees were also emphasised by Meg Russell in both written and oral evidence given to the Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee's inquiry into 'Revisiting Rebuilding the House: the impact of the right reforms'. The committee's report, published in July 2013, cited this evidence in calling for for changes to committee appointments (recommendation 36) along the lines that she proposed. Meg Russell's oral evidence can be found at the back of the committee report, and her written evidence in its companion volume here.

Parliament Homepage


Read more Unit News here >


Is David Cameron actually seeking to destroy the Lords?

Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:00:58 +0000

Yesterday’s new peerage appointments attracted almost universal criticism for further adding to the inexorable growth in size of the House of Lords under David Cameron. But could the gradual erosion of the Lords’ reputation actually benefit the government by weakening parliament? Might it even be a deliberate plan? And – given that the Prime Minister […]


The Constitutional Standards of the House of Lords’ Constitution Committee: A valuable tool for enhancing scrutiny

Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:00:47 +0000

To mark the launch of the second edition of The Constitutional Standards of the House of Lords Constitution Committee, Jack Simson Caird considers the role that a set of constitutional standards could play in the current government. Drawing on the example of English votes for English laws, he argues that such a code would increase […]


The truth about House of Lords appointments

Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:30:54 +0000

Yesterday Prime Minister David Cameron, seemingly undeterred by the already negative media coverage about the Lord Sewel affair, gave strong indications that he intends to make yet more appointments to the Lords. In doing so, he appeared to invoke a convention that does not exist: that of bringing Lords membership into line with Commons seats. […]




The Constitution Unit

Page last modified on 21 feb 13 17:02

Footer menu