Skip to main content
UCL Logo Navigate back to homepage

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Study

    Study

    • Study at UCL
    • Prospective students
    • Current students
    • Accommodation
    • Careers
    • Doctoral School
    • Immigration and visas
    • Student finances
    • Support and wellbeing
  • Research

    Research

    • Research at UCL
    • Engage with us
    • Explore our Research
    • Initiatives and networks
    • Research news
  • Engage

    Engage

    • Engage with UCL
    • Alumni
    • Business partnerships and collaboration
    • Global engagement
    • News and Media relations
    • Policy and political engagement
    • Schools and priority groups
    • Give to UCL
  • About

    About

    • About UCL
    • Who we are
    • Faculties
    • Governance
    • President and Provost
    • Strategy
    • UCL's Bicentenary
  • UCL Logo Active parent page: UCL Bartlett Faculty of the Built Environment
    • Study
    • Active parent page: Research
    • Our schools and institutes
    • People
    • Ideas
    • Engage
    • News and Events
    • About

DPU Working Paper - No. 170

Is BOP2 pro-poor? A theoretical analysis from a development perspective

Is BOP2 pro-poor? A theoretical analysis from a development perspective

Breadcrumb trail

  • UCL Bartlett Faculty of the Built Environment

Faculty menu

  • Research projects
  • Current page: Research publications
  • REF 2021
  • Ethics in the built environment
  • Impact at The Bartlett
  • UCL Royal Academy of Engineering, Centre of Excellence in Sustainable Building Design
  • The Building Envelope Research Network
  • UCL Circularity Hub

Breadcrumb trail

  • UCL Bartlett Faculty of the Built Environment
  • Research
  • DPU Working Paper - No. 170

Author: Shovon Kibria

Publication Date: May 2014

ISSN: 1474-3280

Although interest surrounding Base of the Pyramid (BOP) markets and development initiatives has grown rapidly in the past decade, the academic discourse on this topic has remained underdeveloped. The existing BOP literature is largely business-centric, and rarely deviates from a fundamental BOP proposition involving only private companies and poor communities, and the concomitant effects BOP enterprises have on a corporate level. Although the BOP perspective has evolved in considering the needs of the poor more directly, an analysis on the effectiveness of current BOP strategy as a poverty alleviation mechanism remains lacking.

This paper attempts to address this gap by evaluating the latest BOP strategies from a development perspective, and argues they are unlikely to deliver the expected gains from a profit-making or poverty alleviation angle. This paper also explores alternative applications of the BOP paradigm, suggesting BOP strategies could ultimately be most effective as development tools employed by non-private sector agents. Although governments and NGOs are moving in this direction by starting to embrace BOP ideas, there is still no discourse on whether the public rather than the private sector should be leading BOP policy implementation.

shovon.kibria@gmail.com

Download this paper (pdf).

UCL footer

Visit

  • Bloomsbury Theatre and Studio
  • Library, Museums and Collections
  • UCL Maps
  • UCL Shop
  • Contact UCL

Students

  • Accommodation
  • Current Students
  • Moodle
  • Students' Union

Staff

  • Inside UCL
  • Staff Intranet
  • Work at UCL
  • Human Resources
UCL Logo

University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7679 2000

UCL social media menu

  • Link to Instagram
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Youtube
  • Link to TikTok
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to Bluesky
  • Link to Threads
  • Link to Soundcloud
Here, it can happen.
Back to top

Essential

  • Disclaimer
  • Freedom of Information
  • Accessibility
  • Cookies
  • Privacy
  • Slavery statement
  • Log in

© 2026 UCL