WNESS/1

Corpus Refs:none
Site:WNESS
Discovery:non-arch dig, 1946 inc
History:Forsyth/1996, 495: `This ogham-inscribed fragment was dug up in the kirkyard of St. Ola's Whiteness...no further details are recorded concerning the date or circumstances of its discovery. It was presented to the National Antiquities Museum in 1946 by Peter Moar (NMS Cat. no. IB 256)'.
Geology:Forsyth/1996, 496: `red sandstone'.
Dimensions:0.18 x 0.22 x 0.07 (Forsyth/1996)
Setting:in display
Location:National Museum of Scotland (Cat: NMS Cat no IB 256)
Forsyth/1996, 495: `It was presented to the National Antiquities Museum in 1946 by Peter Moar (NMS Cat. no. IB 256)'.
Form:Indeterminate
Forsyth/1996, 496: `a small fragment of sandstone...The fragment appears to have been deliberately and carefully trimmed rather than smashed...we must posit an original at least four times the size to complete the design...Whether this original was a free-standing cross slab or a recumbent grave-cover cannot be established. Another possibility is that it is an architectural fragment, perhaps part of a box shrine or frieze'.
Condition:frgmntry , poor
Forsyth/1996, 496: `a small fragment of sandstone...The fragment appears to have been deliberately and carefully trimmed rather than smashed...we must posit an original at least four times the size to complete the design'.
Folklore:none
Crosses:none
Decorations:

Forsyth/1996, 496: `carved in false-relief on one face with the remains of an interlace knot'.

References


Inscriptions


WNESS/1/1

Readings

Forsyth, K. (1996):RAQQ[--
Expansion:
RAQQ[--
Forsyth/1996 498--501 reading only
Forsyth, K. (1996):--]NARR
Expansion:
--]NARR
Forsyth/1996 498--501 reading only

Notes

Orientation:Indeterminate
Position:n/a ; broad ; n/a ; panel
Forstyh/1996, 497: `the ogham letters on the Whiteness fragment are contained in a 50mm wide border'.
Incision:pocked
Forsyth/1996, 498: `the individual ogham strokes appear to have been first pocked then smoothed'.
Date:900 - 999 (Forsyth/1998)
Language:Indeterminate (oghms)
Ling. Notes:Forsyth/1998, 48: `too fragmentary to be of linguistic significance'.
Palaeography:Forsyth/1996, 500: `written in a stately...form of the script, with sloping b-h-aicme strokes and vowel-stroke occupying the whole ogham band. The component strokes are generously and evenly spaced...all appropriate letters are bound'.
Legibility:some
Lines:1
Carving errors:0
Doubtful:no

Names

References