TGONY/1

Corpus Refs:Huebner/1876:10
Macalister/1945:461
Okasha/1993:66
Site:TGONY
Discovery:first mentioned, 1862 Smirke, E.
History:Okasha/1993, 299: `The stone was first noted in 1862 when it was described as forming `part of the foundation of the south-west angle of the Church'. This is the present position of the stone...although local tradition asserts that the stone was once standing in the churchyard'.
Geology:Macalister/1945, 438: `grit'.

Thomas/1994, 283: `red granite'.

Dimensions:1.43 x 0.54 x 0.18 (Oksaha/1993)
Setting:in struct
Location:earliest
Okasha/1993, 299: `The stone is now built into the outside of St Cuby church, the parish church of Tregony. It is built into the west-facing side of the south-west corner of the church at ground level'.
Form:plain
Okasha/1993, 299: `The stone is an uncarved pillar stone'.
Condition:n/a , good
Okasha/1993, 299: `It is uncertain whether or not it is complete'.
Folklore:none
Crosses:none
Decorations:

Thomas/1994, 283--284: `There is a curved line above the four-line vertical inscription'.

References


Inscriptions


TGONY/1/1

Readings

Macalister, R.A.S. (1945):{N}O{N}{N}IT{A} | ERCIL/I{V}I | RICATITRISF/IL/I | ERCIL/I{N}GI
Expansion:
NONNITA ERCILIVI RICATI TRIS FILI ERCILINGI
Macalister/1945 438--439 reading only
Thomas/1994 283--284 reading only
Okasha, E. (1984):{N}O{N}{N}IT{A} | ERCIL/I[{V}]I | RICATITRISF/IL/I | ERCIL/I{N}GI
Expansion:
NONNITA ERCILIVI RICATI TRIS FILI ERCILINGI
Translation:
[The stone] of Nonnita (PN), Ercili[v]us (PN), [and] of Ricatus (PN), three children of Ercilingus (PN).
Okasha/1993 299--302 reading only
Thomas, C. (1994):NONNITA | ERCIL/IVI | RICATITRIS F/IL/I | ERCIL/INCI
Expansion:
NONNITA ERCILIVI RICATI TRIS FILI ERCILINGI
Translation:
(Memorial of) Nonnita (PN), Ercilivus (PN), Ricatus (PN), three children of Ercilingus (PN).
Thomas/1994 283 reading only

Notes

Orientation:vertical down
Position:n/a ; broad ; n/a ; undivided
Incision:pockrub
Macalister.1945, 439: `pocked and rubbed'.
Date:500 - 799 (Okasha/1993)

566 - 599 (Thomas/1994)
Language:Latin (rcaps)
Ling. Notes:none
Palaeography:Okasha/1993, 299: `predominantly capital script'.

Thomas/1994, 284: `N is written as H throughout, the A is inverted and there are a few ligatures'.

Legibility:good
Okasha/1993, 299: `The text is legible but it is unclear whether or not it is complete'.
Lines:4
Carving errors:0
Doubtful:no

Names

References