RTHDF/1

Corpus Refs:Cuppage/etal/1986:873(1)
Macalister/1945:194
Site:RTHDF
Discovery:first mentioned, 1945 Macalister, R.A.S.
History:Macalister/1945, 188, seems to be the first record of this stone.
Geology:Macalister/1945, 188: `Grit'.
Dimensions:0.94 x 0.27 x 0.12 (Cuppage/etal/1986)
Setting:in ground
Location:earliest
Cuppage/etal/1986, 336: `standing upright against the W end of a modern tomb near the E side of the graveyard'.
Form:cross-marked
Condition:complete , good
Macalister/1945, 189: `the edges [of the stone] are chipped and most of the vowels are gone'.
Folklore:none
Crosses:1: latin; linear; straight; plain; plain; none; outer curv; other; n/a
2: equal-armed; linear; straight; plain; plain; none; none; none; n/a
Decorations:

Macalister/1945, 189: `An equilateral cross in a circle, prolonged above and below and crossletted, appears on the face of the stone'.

Cuppage et al/1986, 336: `The present W face of the stone is inscribed with a cross-in-circle, the stem of the cross continuing below the circle to form the shaft of another cross. Directly above the circle is a 3rd plain cross, the head of which appears to have been extended to the top edge of the stone by the addition of a groove separated from the cross by only a slight ridge. It is also possible that this latter groove is earlier than the cross'.

References


Inscriptions


RTHDF/1/1     Pictures

Readings

Macalister, R.A.S. (1945):S[IDA]N[I]M[A]Q[ID] ||| ALO
Expansion:
S[IDA]N[I] M[A]Q[I] [DA]L[O]
Macalister/1945 188--189, Fig. reading only
Cuppage, J. (1986):S[.]D[.]N[.]M[.]Q[.]D ||| ALA
Expansion:
S[.]D[.]N[.]I M[A]Q[I] DALA
Cuppage/etal/1986 336 reading only

Notes

Orientation:vertical up along
Position:inc ; base ; beside cross ; undivided
Macalister/1945, 188: `Inscription on dexter angle and top'.
Incision:inc
Date:None published
Language:Goidelic (ogham)
Ling. Notes:none
Palaeography:none
Legibility:poor
Macalister/1945, 189: `what is left of the writing is in good condition, but the edges are chipped and the vowels are gone, as well as several of the scores on the H-surface'.

Macalister/1945, 189: `In the first word I1 and A, as well as the proximal half of the D, are lost; in the second I45; and the following D, which comes at the turn of the angle, is barely traceable'.

Cuppage et al/1986, 336: `The ogham inscription has suffered considerable damage and many of the scores have entirely or partially disappeared'.

Lines:1
Carving errors:0
Doubtful:no

Names

References