LWNIO/1

Corpus Refs:Huebner/1876:89
Macalister/1945:378
Nash-Williams/1950:169
Site:LWNIO
Discovery:non-arch dig, 1846 inc
History:Francis/1867, 446, records that the stone was found at Llanwinio Carn while making foundations for a new church.

Doubt as to the authenticity of the stone was cast by Rhys/1876, 245--246, in a review of Huebner/1876.

In response Francis/1877, 74-75, states that he has now ascertained that the stone is in the possession of Mr Adam of Middleton Hall, where it was `stowed away against the wall of some outlying sheds'.

According to Anon/1919c, 2b, the stone remained at Middleton Hall until 1919 when `Major Wm. J. Hughes and Mrs Hughes had it conveyed to the Society's custody at Carmarthen'.

The stone is still in the Carmarthenshire Museum.

Geology:
Dimensions:1.19 x 0.38 x 0.29 (converted from Macalister/1945)
Setting:in display
Location:National Museum of Wales (Cat: Cast no. 14.306/5)
The stone is now in the Carmarthenshire Museum.
Form:plain
Nash-Williams/1950, 118: `rough pillar-stone'.
Condition:incomplete , good
Nash-Williams/1950, 118: `rough pillar-stone (top fractured away)'.

Macalister/1945, 359: `the top of the stone is broken'.

Folklore:none
Crosses:1: latin; outline; straight; round; square; none; inner curv; none; plain
Decorations:

Nash-Williams/1950, 118: `On the (original) butt is an incised linear Latin ring-cross between oblique bars (one wanting), suggesting that the stone was later reset head downwards'.

Macalister/1945, 360, does not show the oblique bar, but the photo in Nash-Williams/1950, Plate III, shows it clearly.

References


Inscriptions


LWNIO/1/1     Pictures

Readings

Francis, G.G. (1867):BIAD{I} | ACIBO6IBE | VE
Expansion:
n/a
Francis/1867 446 reading only
Huebner/1876 31 reading only
Rhys, J. (1877):BLAD{I} | FILIBODIBE | VE
Expansion:
BLADI FILI BODIBEVI
Rhys/1877 139--140 reading only
Westwood, J.O. (1879):BIVAD{I} | FILIBODIBE | VE
Expansion:
BIVADI FILI BODIBEVE
Translation:
(The stone) of Bivadus (PN) son of Bodibeva (PN).
Anon/1919c 2b reading only
Nash-Williams/1950 118 reading only
Westwood/1876 91 reading only
Macalister, R.A.S. (1945):BIVAD{I} | AVIBODIBE | VE
Expansion:
BIVADI AVI BODIBEVE
Jackson/1953 180--181 reading only
Macalister/1945 359--360 reading only
McManus/1991 63 reading only
Thomas/1994 75 reading only

Notes

Orientation:vertical down
Position:n/a ; broad ; below cross ; undivided
Macalister/1945, 359--360, and Nash-Williams/1950, 118, both argue that the cross on the stone dates to a period after the inscription. Thus although the inscription is described as 'below cross', the cross was possibly not there at the time of carving.
Incision:pocked
Macalister/1945, 359: `pocked and rubbed smooth'.
Nash-Williams/1950, 118: `coarsely picked'.
Date:400 - 599 (Nash-Williams/1950)

500 - 533 (Jackson/1953)

500 - 533 (McManus/1991)
Language:Latin (rcaps)
Ling. Notes:Macalister/1945, 359-360, does not refer to the inscription as `Latin', but Nash-Williams/1950, 118 does so. This is partly because he read AVI as F/ILI, which would make the inscription Latin.

Jackson/1953, 180--181, who reads the word as AVI, still, however, sees the inscription as Latin, arguing that `the engraver did not attempt to translate Pr.I. avi (by nepos as elsewhere) but simply transliterated it'.

Thomas/1994, 75: 'the avi(/awi/) is a `latin' imitation of avvi (/awi/)'.

Palaeography:Nash-Williams/1950, 118: `Roman capitals...with horizontal final -I in l.1, VA in the same line is ligatured...B in l. 2 has disjoined loops. Some of the I's have straight serifs'.

The V/A ligature is strange in that the leftwards stroke of the V comes from half way up the left ascender of the A, rather than from the bottom. The V in line 2 has one vertical ascender, with straight serifs, and the right stroke is at a great angle so as to almost be horizontal.

Macalister/1945, 360, argued that the carver started to carve a V at the end of line 2, but, realising there was not the room, started the letter again on a third line.

Legibility:good
Macalister/1945, 359: `letters are in good condition'.

Lines:3
Carving errors:0
Doubtful:no

Names

References


LWNIO/1/2     Pictures

Readings

Francis, G.G. (1867):AVVIBOCIBA ||| UTTEH
Expansion:
n/a
Francis/1867 446 reading only
Rhys, J. (1877):AVVIBODDIB[--] ||| BEVV[--
Expansion:
BEVV[--] ||| AVVI BODDIB[--]
Translation:
(The body of) Bew (PN), grandson of Boddibew (PN).
Rhys/1877 140 reading only
Westwood/1876 91 reading only
Macalister, R.A.S. (1945):AVVIBODDI[BA] ||| BEVVE
Expansion:
AVVI BODDIBEVVE
Macalister/1945 360 reading only
Nash-Williams, V.E. (1950):BIVVA[--]||| AVVI BODDIB[--
Expansion:
BIVVAIDONAS ||| AVVI BODDIBEVVAS
Translation:
(The stone) of Bivvaidu (PN), descendant of Boddibevva (PN).
Jackson/1953 180-181 reading only
Nash-Williams/1950 118 reading only
RCAHMW/1917 201 reading only
McManus, D. (1991):BIVV[U--] ||| AVVI BODDIB[--
Expansion:
BIVVU[--] ||| AVVI BODDIB[--
McManus/1991 97 reading only

Notes

Orientation:vertical up up
Position:n/a ; arris ; below cross ; undecorated
Macalister/1945, 359--360, and Nash-Williams/1950, 118, both argue that the cross on the stone dates to a period after the inscription. Thus although the inscription is described as `below cross', the cross was possibly not there at the time of carving.

Nash-Williams/1950, 118: `the ogam inscription...is incised along both angles of the face reading upwards'.

Incision:inc
Date:400 - 599 (Nash-Williams/1950)

500 - 533 (Jackson/1953)

500 - 533 (McManus/1991)
Language:Goidelic (ogham)
Ling. Notes:none
Palaeography:Macalister/1945, 360: `the Ogham has in this case cartainly been cut subsequently to the Roman'.

Rhys/1877, 140, argues that the four strokes to the left make up two Ds rather than a C, in spite of the fact that there was no gap to mark the new letter.

Legibility:some
Macalister/1945, 359: `the top of the stone is broken, carrying off some of the Oghams; and there must have been a third line of Oghams on a back angle, which has been split off and lost'.
Lines:2
Carving errors:0
Doubtful:no

Names

References