LLNDG/2

Corpus Refs:Macalister/1945:415
Nash-Williams/1950:279
Site:LLNDG
Discovery:first mentioned, 1893 Drinkwater, C.H.
History:No context is given of the discovery in Drinkwater/1893, 188--89. He does, however, mention recent roofing work on the church, so it is possible that the inscription was discovered during that work.
Geology:Macalister/1945, 393: `limestone'.
Dimensions:0.41 x 0.15 x 0.1 (converted from Macalister/1945)
Setting:in struct
Location:earliest
Drinkwater/1893, 188--189: `Under the window in the north wall, near the roof loft, is a stone cill (slate) in which, in ancient characters, is the imperfect inscription'.

Nash-Williams/1950, 169: `Inside church, mounted on sill of S. window of chancel'.

Form:fragment
Nash-Williams/1950, 169: `Fragmentary (?) rough pillar-stone. 16" h. x 5 1/4" w. x 3" t.'.
Condition:frgmntry , poor
Folklore:none
Crosses:none
Decorations:no other decoration

References


Inscriptions


LLNDG/2/1     Pictures

Readings

Drinkwater, C.H. (1893):E9VE{*}TRINOMINE
Expansion:
none given
Drinkwater/1893 188--189 reading only
Macalister, R.A.S. (1945):EQVESTRINOMINE
Expansion:
EQVESTRI NOMINE
Macalister/1945 393 concise discussion
Nash-Williams, V.E. (1950):EQVESTRINOMINE
Expansion:
EQVESTRIS NOMINE
Translation:
(The person) by the name of Equester (PN) (lies here).
Nash-Williams/1950 169 concise discussion

Notes

Orientation:vertical indeterminate
Position:n/a ; broad ; n/a ; undecorated
Nash-Williams/1950, 169: `Latin inscription (Fig. 183) in one line reading vertically downwards (?)'.
Incision:inc
Macalister/1945, 393: `pocked'.
Nash-Williams/1950, 169: `lightly picked'.
Date:500 - 599 (Nash-Williams/1950)

533 - 599 (Jackson/1953)
Jackson/1953, 168, 193 suggests a date from the mid to the later sixth century.
Language:Latin (rcaps)
Ling. Notes:Macalister/1945, 393--94: `The inscription is complete...there is no justification for the statement in Comm. [RCAHMW/1921] that it is obviously part of a longer inscription. The formula is confirmed by the Carn Hedryn stone (448)'.

Nash-Williams/1950, 169: `The unusual formula employed in the inscription can be paralleled in Early Christian epitaphs of the 4th century A.D. and later in Italy and Gaul [1], and was apparently derived from pagan Roman practice.

[1] ICG, i, [LeBlant/1865] p. 462 (Italy -- Hic iacet nomine Decimus); CIR, i, p. 59 (+ In hoc sepulchro requi(e)scet in pace puella nomine Alberga, &c.). [CISP: for the most recent edition of this stone see Boppert/1971, 104--07.]

Palaeography:Macalister/1945, 393: `lettering...in small and well-shaped characters...The engraver erroneously doubled the T and was obliged to turn it into R, a little awkwardly. The O resembles a reversed half-uncial a.

Nash-Williams/1950, 169: `Small Roman capitals, lightly picked, with half-uncial S. The form of the Q, like a modern figure 9, is peculiar and apparently based on the Roman cursive form'.

Legibility:good
Macalister/1945, 393: `in good condition'.
Lines:1
Carving errors:0
Doubtful:no

Names

References