Corpus Refs: | Macalister/1945:305 |
Site: | CRGHH |
Discovery: | recognised, 1860 Blackett, W.R. |
History: | Macalister/1945, 294: `Discovered by W.R. Blackett, just outside the eastern entrance of the graveyard of the ruined church of Temple (F)enoach...Brash...sought for the stone and failed to find it (1869). In Hitchcock's notebook I find the information that it was situated a quarter of a mile north of Ballyquin...In a notebook left behind by Rev. Canon Hewson...I find the record that he `searched the cemetery inside and outside...but could not find it or hear anything of it'. He was told, however, of a `tall upright stone on the townland of Curraghnagarraha'...Subsequently Canon Power and I searched for the stone, only to find that it had been broken up and that the fragments had been used in building a field-wall'. |
Geology: | |
Dimensions: | 1.37 x 0.3 x 0.51 (converted from Macalister/1945) |
Setting: | Lost (present 1860, missing 1869) |
Location: | This stone was last seen by its finder, W.R. Blackett, and could not be found by Brash in 1869. Macalister/1945, 294: `Canon Power and I searched for the stone, only to find that it had been broken up and that the fragments had been used in building a field-wall'. |
Form: | plain Macalister/1945, 294, reproduces the Rev. Canon Hewson's account of being told about a 'tall upright stone'. |
Condition: | n/a , n/a Macalister/1945, 294, notes that the stone had not been seen since its discovery. When he and Canon Power looked for it they found `that it had been broken up and that the fragments had been used in building a field-wall'. |
Folklore: | none |
Crosses: | none |
Decorations: | no other decoration |
Macalister, R.A.S. (1945): | [--] Expansion: [--] Macalister/1945 294 minor reference |
Orientation: | Incomplete Information |
Position: | inc ; inc ; inc ; inc |
Incision: | inc |
Date: | None published |
Language: | Incomplete Information (ogham) |
Ling. Notes: | none |
Palaeography: | none |
Legibility: | n/a Macalister/1945, 294: `The evidence of Blackett and, especially, of Hitchcock, make me suspect that this stone formed one of the class of pseudo-Oghams...but no proof can now be obtained of this comforting possibility'. |
Lines: | |
Carving errors: | 0 |
Doubtful: | yes |