| Corpus Refs: | Macalister/1909:16 Macalister/1949:612 |
| Site: | CLMAC |
| Discovery: | first mentioned, 1901 Macalister, R.A.S. |
| History: | First recorded in Macalister/1909, 4, where he states `I failed to find the fragment on my last visit'. Macalister/1949, 44: `Not found on my last visit'. |
| Geology: | |
| Dimensions: | 0.0 x 0.0 x 0.0 (Unknown) |
| Setting: | Lost (present 1901, missing 1905) |
| Location: | Macalister/1909, 4 states he failed to find this stone on his last visit which was in 1905, the visit prior to this being in 1901. Macalister/1949, 44: `not found on my last visit'. |
| Form: | Indeterminate Macalister/1949, 44: 'I have no note of its dimensions'. |
| Condition: | frgmntry , poor The piece appears broken on all its edges, and even that which we have is damaged and obscuring the letter O. |
| Folklore: | none |
| Crosses: | 1: latin; linear; straight; plain; plain; none; none; none; n/a |
| Decorations: | Macalister/1909, 4 and Macalister/1949, 44 both describe the decoration simply as `plain cross'. |
| Macalister, R.A.S. (1909): | + OR[-- Expansion: OR[-- Macalister/1909 4 reading only Macalister/1949 44, Plate X reading only |
| Orientation: | vertical down |
| Position: | n/a ; n/a ; n/a ; undecorated |
| Incision: | inc |
| Date: | None published |
| Language: | Goidelic (rbook) |
| Ling. Notes: | none |
| Palaeography: | CISP: The R is majuscule, but the open bow and its context make it likely that the whole inscription was in half-uncial. |
| Legibility: | some Damage to the stone has obscured the O, but the R seems clear. |
| Lines: | 1 |
| Carving errors: | 0 |
| Doubtful: | no |