Accessibility to Public Transport Experiment (APEX)


Description  |  Accessibility Gap diagram  |  Research team

APEX set out to establish a means to evaluate accessibility for disabled people in reaching and using the public transport system.

Two views of disability:
 
Medical: an infirmity, impairment etc. which means that a person cannot breach a barrier.
Social: barriers are designed in such a way that some people cannot breach them.

There are three types of barrier to consider when thinking about accessibility:
Physical Sensory Cognitive
Distance Legibility Clarity
Widths Tactile Surfaces Simplicity
Gaps Audibility Ease of understanding

To design these barriers so that more people can use public transport independently, we have to understand how the barriers act on different people. The APEX research studied a group of people in East London in order to formulate an approach to the assessment of accessibility. This broadened previous research in this field.

For example:

95% of the sample could read a timetable if it were produced in 26 point font size but the timetables would be very large.

90% could read the timetable if the font size were printed in 20 point type.

70% could read a timetable produced in 12 point Lucida Sans font

However, nobody could read the leaflets produced by the local operator in 7 point text.

top of this page
 


 
CPT=Conventional Public Transport
SNT=Special Needs Transport
LFB=Low Floor Buses
DND=Dense Network Design
AI=Accessible Information

An improvement in accessibility could enable someone to find travelling easier or to move from one category of assistance to another and so increase their independence as well.

top of this page

Research Team: Natasha Brown, Farzaneh Bitarafen, Martha Caiaffa, Nick Tyler


(Back to the APEX main page)


Return to the Centre for Transport Studies site or to UCL home page.
 Please note that any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect UCL College policy. No claim is made, explicit or implied, about the suitability of any data presented here for any purpose. All rights are reserved by individual members of the Dept., the Dept. itself, or UCL as appropriate, unless otherwise indicated. Any links to pages provided by individuals in the department are done so on the understanding that they agree to abide by the College and draft UCL Guidelines.


Last updated Jul '00
Please send any comments or queries about this web site to the webmaster