New Scientist Archive
NewScientist.com NewScientistJobs.com New Scientist Graduate New Scientist Archive New Scientist Subscriptions
Search
Help
Log Out
 

Selected Article


Modify search  |   Back to results

 
Magazine section: This Week  
 

Children bowled over by subtle sales pitch

New Scientist vol 151 issue 2044 - 24 August 96, page 6

 

THE subtle art of the spin bowler has a lot to do with the success of the Indian cricket team. But commercial sponsorship of the team also puts a subtle spin on the message that India's children receive when they tune in to watch their sporting heroes.

Unlike the test cricketers, India's children cannot spot the "wrong 'un". Researchers in Britain and India have found that when the tobacco industry sponsors test matches, the children think that smoking has something to do with India's success-even though none of the test team smokes.

The India-New Zealand cricket series was shown live on television in India in October and November 1995, and was heavily sponsored by tobacco firm W. D. & H. O. Wills, a subsidiary of BAT Industries. The company's logo appeared prominently on all the players' clothes as well as around the cricket ground. Cigarette adverts also featured prominently during the match broadcasts.

A couple of months after the competition Jayant Vaidya, a cancer surgeon at the Royal Marsden Hospital in London, and colleagues at the Goa Cancer Society and carried out surveys of children aged 13 to 16 from 53 of Goa's high schools.

More than 75 per cent of the 1948 students knew that tobacco was as addictive as heroin, caused cancer and heart disease and reduced lifespan. Even so, 100 of the 1275 children who watched the matches were tempted to try cigarettes afterwards. Among the 605 children who had not seen the matches, only 29 tried cigarettes.

Although all the youngsters were aware that cigarette companies were just sponsors, many made false associations between smoking and sport. Not a single player in the Indian team smoked in 1995. But 1110 children thought that at least one player did, while 428 children thought at least four team members were smokers.

The researchers found that children who believed there were no smokers in the team were significantly less likely to experiment with cigarettes than those who thought some were smokers.

Only 1.7 per cent of the children who thought the retired Indian cricket hero Sunil Gavaskar was a nonsmoker had tried cigarettes compared with 5.5 per cent of those who thought he smoked.

Some children thought that smoking actually made you a better cricketer. Nearly 7 per cent of children thought that cigarettes made you stronger and 6 per cent thought they improved your chances of winning. "When a child is watching TV he sees Wills on the bat," says Vaidya, " and he thinks that must be why he wins."

Indeed, the idea that smoking improves your game was the single most significant factor in persuading children to try cigarettes-overriding their knowledge of the dangers of smoking. The perception that players smoked was the second most important factor, followed by simply watching the series, the researchers report in the latest issue of the British Medical Journal.

Also last week, the National Audit Office reported that the British Government's health targets on young people and smoking are unlikely to be met. The number of 11 to 15-year-olds smoking has increased, from 8 per cent in 1988 to 12 per cent in 1994.


Alison Motluk
 
 

Modify search  |   Back to results

 
Archive keyword search
 
 
Your recent searches
Searching for vaidya. Sorted by Relevance.
 
Searching for 'fluid or flow or tube or closed'. Sorted by Relevance.
 
Searching for 'closed or tube or flow'. Sorted by Relevance.
 
Searching for 'closed or tube or flow'. Sorted by Relevance.
 
Searching for 'closed or tube or flow'. Sorted by Relevance.
 
 
 
 
 
       
         
 

Contact Us  •  FAQ  •  Media Information  •  Disclaimer  •  Terms and Conditions  •  Privacy Policy 
© Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.