Find a SECReT supervisor
Information for overseas students
View SECReT animation
Download SECReT brochure
conference-image


UCL SECReT holds over 30 events annually aimed at presenting the latest science and policy matters in the crime and security arena. Our events are intended for different audiences and include:


Exclusive seminars for our SECReT community designed to showcase security science from different disciplines. In particular these seminars allow students to engage with key players from industry and the public sector, for example Jeremy Crump, the Head of Strategy for the National Police Improvement Agency or Sir Stephen Lander, former head of MI5.

2013 seminars

The German Police University 


Klaus Welter, German Police University

Klaus Welter is an Assistant Chief Constable and Head of faculty of ‘Criminalistics-strategy and policy’ at the German Police University. Klaus presented a seminar about his department’s work in the German Police University including how the German police service is structured, and various research projects that the GPU is currently working on including Establishing and developing of a theory in Police leadership; Basic models to secure big events (BaSiGo); and Smart Policing. More...

2012 seminars

Unlocking the investment returns of effective crime reduction programmes: why particular interventions work, and how they can be implemented effectively in the UK context



Jacqueline Mallender, CEO Matrix Knowledge

Governments across the world invest in interventions to promote law and order, prevent crime and reduce offending.  In recent years, international research has evolved which demonstrates the effectiveness, or otherwise, of these interventions (see for example http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/coordinating_groups/index.php).  Current and recent Departmental and Cabinet Office initiatives demonstrate that UK policy makers are keen to develop and share knowledge in this field and to understand why particular interventions work, and how they can be implemented effectively in the UK context (see for example the recent discussion with stakeholders about “what works centres”).. Increasingly foundations (such as the Monument Trust) are also looking at effectiveness when considering funding applications from third sector innovators seeking to develop new interventions in this field. As outcome-based contracting develops, commissioners and providers of for correctional services in the UK will need to ensure that evidence of effectiveness underpins service delivery agreements and associated financing. Interventions also cost money. Policy makers are increasingly looking beyond the impact on crime and re-offending and are asking about value for money, affordability, and funding priorities. Initiatives such as the Social Finance Bond are being promoted by government as a means of unlocking the investment returns of effective crime reduction programmes and enable effective interventions to receive much needed seed funding. The lecture will provide an introduction to this issue and how economic methods in this area are being developed. Some case studies will be presented to show economic analysis of crime interventions and crime programmes will be presented.

Bio: Jacqueline is CEO of Matrix Knowledge and is an international health and welfare economist with over 30 years’ experience. She started her career as a government economist in the UK, firstly in the Department of Health and subsequently as the Health Economic Advisor in H.M. Treasury. Jacqueline then worked as an economist with Coopers and Lybrand before leaving to found MHA a specialist health economics consultancy working in the NHS and which was the foundation of Matrix Knowledge (TMKG Ltd). During her career she has worked in fields of health, crime and justice and education in the UK and internationally. She is a convenor of the joint Campbell and Cochrane Economics Methods Group and is on the Steering Committee of the Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group.


More...

Diagnosing and preventing corruption


Professor Adam Graycar, Australian National University (ANU)


Adam Graycar is Professor of Public Policy at the Australian National University (ANU), where he is also Director of the Research School of Social Sciences. He joined ANU in 2010 when he became the Foundation Dean of the Australian National Institute for Public Policy for two years.  He has had long experience in both academia and in government.  His most recent government position was Head, Cabinet Office, Government of South Australia, and his most recent academic post before joining ANU was Dean, School of Criminal Justice, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey.  He also served as Director of the Australian Institute of Criminology for nine years.

Adam’s current research is on corruption, and he is the Director of the Transnational Research Institute on Corruption at the ANU.

He has worked in many policy areas and in many policy settings.  He has had long experience in policy making, research, and research management at the most senior levels in Australia and internationally.  He has run two major national social research agencies.  He has acquired extensive policy experience over 22 years in the senior level posts he has held in government in Australia, both Federal and State.  He has two doctorates from the University of NSW, is the author of some 200 scholarly publications, in fields such as political science, public administration, sociology, social policy population studies, criminology.


More...

Crime Patterns and Spatial Choice: Theories, Models and Some Evidence

Wim Bernasco, The Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR)


Most behavior of interest to social scientists is choice behavior: deciding to take a course of action while forgoing alternative options. Criminology is no exception. This presentation deals with the spatial choices that offenders make: where to go, how far to travel, in what direction, and how? In geographical and environmental criminology, these questions have traditionally been studied in research traditions isolated from each other. Journey-to-crime research, for example, explores how far offenders travel to crime, but has not really investigated where they go. Ecological studies of variations in crime rates have emphasized the role of attractive criminal opportunities, but they have ignored that offenders must know about such opportunities in order to profit from them. Recently, the spatial discrete choice framework was introduced in geographic criminology. It explains the offender’s choice of where to commit an offense, and it integrates the study of spatial crime distributions with journey to crime research. Developed in micro-economics, it is firmly rooted in principles of rational choice and utility maximization, and requires input from more substantive theories, such as crime pattern analysis from criminology, learning theory from psychology, or foraging theory from behavioral ecology. A number of recent applications address criminal location choice in burglary, robbery and other crimes. They have demonstrated that the spatial discrete choice framework can successfully describe spatial decisions as a function of characteristics of the target locations and the characteristics of the offender. In particular, the findings show that offenders are attracted to places that are accessible to them (e.g. nearby their homes), where the expected profits of crime are high while the risks of apprehension are low. Other applications have established that social barriers inhibit the journey to crime, that highways can deter short journeys to crime but facilitate longer journeys to crime, and that former anchor points (past homes) play a role in offenders’ crime location choices. Like all questions pertaining to geography, the spatial discrete choice framework is saddled with the challenge of defining the appropriate spatial unit of analysis. New developments in the area of crime location choice include a focus on small spatial units of analysis (such as street segments), the assessment of spatial spillover effects, repeat crime location choice, and crime location choices that are conditional on time.

Profile

Dr Wim Bernasco is a senior researcher at the NSCR.  His current work focuses on spatial aspects of criminal activities, including variations in crime and delinquency between neighbourhoods, offender travel behaviour and target selection.  He was the first researcher to employ McFadden’s discrete choice approach in the study of where offenders choose to offend and has published several seminal works on this topic. 


More...

How Cryptosystems Are Really Broken

Prof Adi Shamir, Weizmann Institute

More...

Sex, race and offending trajectories: An analysis of an Australian longitudinal offending database


Professor Anna Stewart, Griffith University


Anna Stewart is a professor in the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Griffith University. From 2008 – 2010 she was the Head, School of Criminology and Criminal Justice.  Prior to this in 2007-2008 she was the Deputy Dean (Learning and Teaching) in the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences.  In 1994 she received her PhD from University of Queensland in psychology. The topic of her thesis was An investigation of decision making by child protection workers. Since this time she has been interested in the research uses of government administrative data.  Using these data she has built two longitudinal birth cohort databases, linking information about individuals born in 1983/1984 and 1990 from child protection, youth offending and adult offending databases.  Her current work involves linking these data to data from Queensland Health regarding system contacts for mental health concerns.  She has examined the lifetime contacts individuals have with child protection, youth justice, adult criminal justice systems, system responses to youth offending and domestic violence, management of risk, diversionary responses and system modelling. She has published over 60 peer-reviewed publications, government reports and non peer reviewed publications. She has been involved in partnerships that have obtained over four million dollars in National Competitive Funding, consultancies and other government research funding.  Her work receives strong support from across Queensland Government criminal justice agencies.



More...

Forensic Computing - A Beginners Guide

Denis Edgar-Nevill, Founding Chair, British Computer Society Cybercrime Forensics Specialist Group More...

A Scientific Investigation of Blast Injuries: London 7/7 Terrorist Bombings


Dr Hasu Patel, Consultant Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon at St Bartholomew’s and the Royal London Hospitals More...

The UK National Risk Assessment

Anita Friend, Assistant Director Risk Assessment, Cabinet Office

Anita Friend presented on the UK’s National Risk Assessment and the National Security Strategy.

More...

The Strategies of Kidnappers: Understanding violence during kidnapping for ransom negotiations


Dr. Everard Phillips

Research suggests that kidnappers who ransom their hostages use violence towards their hostage in calculated or sometimes ritualistic manner in order to coerce the target of the ransom. Yet, little is empirical analysis
of these methods and how these actions constitute a crime commission process. This seminar briefly introduced two studies that examine how hostages are coerced in captivity or prepared for the eventual ‘proof of
life’ process. In addition too, examining how this behaviour reflects the types of tactics that kidnappers use to negotiate a ransom demand. In particular, how kidnappers use violence towards their hostage during the
hostage negotiation, as well as the strategic implication of these actions. These factors will relate to understanding whether the hostage will be killed by their captors.


Dr Everard Phillips has been researching the strategic behaviour of kidnappers who ransom for over 10 years. A Criminal Psychologist Everard specialises in profiling factors that lead to post-settlement hostage
homicide, hostage victimisation, and the tactical negotiation behaviour of kidnappers who ransom. Although his focus covers contemporary kidnapping for ransom activity as seen in Iraq and Afghanistan in recent years, his
primary focus is behaviours of the differing organised criminal groups that operate in Latin America, South East Asia and Africa. Everard has spoken extensively on the subject to a broad spectrum of audiences that have
included diplomatic, military, various international risk and security organisations.


More...

Illicit activity in prisons - how can technology help?


Dr Mireille Levy, NOMS Science and Technology Advisor
Martin Lee, Head of the NOMS Intelligence and Operations Unit


Reducing illicit activity in prisons is a constant battle in which technology has a huge role to play. The talk introduced the National Offender Management Service (NOMS) and gave an overview of the main criminal threats inside prisons and of current and future mitigation strategies. It looked in more detail at drugs and the concrete problem of reducing supply and use in a diverse and continuously evolving environment. The talk reviewed the technologies currently available to detect drugs in prisons and set out the challenges for further research.

Dr Mireille Levy

After a distinguished research career as a physicist at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Dr Mireille Levy joined the Home Office in 2001 to manage police radios. She is now the Science and
Technology Advisor for the National Offender Management Service. Her remit covers all science and technology issues relevant to prison and probation, from preventing use of mobile phones and drugs inside jails to equipping prison staff with modern telecommunication systems and developing the next generation of electronic tagging. She is a Member of the Institution of Engineering and Technology and a Fellow of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications.

Martin Lee

By profession I am an analytical chemist specialising in the drugs field having worked for many years  in the Forensic Science Service as a forensic toxicologist.I have worked extensively with law enforcement agencies on all aspects of policing, including a spell as a senior adviser to HM Chief Inspector of Constabulary. More recently I lead for NOMS on the prisons drug strategy, which included the commissioning of drug treatment and drug testing services and the oversight of our
research programme. As lately head of the Intelligence and Operations Unit, I had lead policy responsibility for the key threats faced by NOMS. I am a Chartered Chemist,a Member of the Royal Society of Chemistry and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts.


More...

Spatial is Special: Interdisciplinary Research at CASA

James Cheshire, UCL Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis More...

Strategic security planning for the built environment

Colin McKinnon, Innovation Director, Buro Happold Ltd
Andrew Sieradzki, Director of Happold Safe and Secure.

Buro Happold is a professional services firm providing engineering consultancy, design, planning, project management and consulting services for all aspects of buildings, infrastructure and the environment, with its head office in Bath, Somerset.[5] Originally working mainly on projects in the Middle East, the firm now operates worldwide and in almost all areas of engineering for the built environment, with offices in seven countries. The parent company owns the subsidiary companies such as Happold Safe and Secure. The firm includes a number of specialist engineering consultancy groups, including fire engineering and lighting consultancy.

Buro Happold talked about how they designs security into some of their major projects using examples such as the Emirates Stadium. They also talked about some of their research and projects.



More...

Evolving the Face of a Criminal

Dr. Charlie Frowd, University of Central Lancashire.



EvoFIT is a software system that helps victims and witnesses of crime generate an image of a criminal’s face. It draws on Dr Frowd’s research looking at techniques to improve the effectiveness of facial composites, so that eyewitnesses can build a clearer, more accurate image of the person they saw commit a crime. The pioneering system requires witnesses and victims to repeatedly select from screens of complete faces, with ‘breeding’, to ‘evolve’ a composite of the criminal’s face. It is currently used in crime investigations throughout the world because of the high identification rate of its composites.

EvoFIT composites have been made even more effective with a novel animation technique that Dr Frowd has developed.  The technique progressively caricatures a composite, similar to the way sketch artists work, exaggerating characteristic parts of the face.  Police can use this image format when making public appeals for information on TV and online newspapers, substantially increasing the chances of identifying the criminal.

Background to the work

Dr Frowd’s research explored the effectiveness of traditional methods for constructing composites using software programs in current police use. Such systems build a face by witnesses and victims selecting individual facial parts: hair, eyes, nose, mouth, etc. The research has found a startling result: a composite is rarely named correctly when constructed a couple of days after the face had been seen, the norm for witnesses and victims of crime. As a consequence, and part of collaborative research, Charlie has initiated and led a range of projects that have sought to improve the quality and recognition of these images. He has also about 40 research papers published in the field.

Charlie’s PhD in Stirling involved development of a new composite system. It is called EvoFIT and was inspired by how we perceive human faces, as whole entities, and also by selection and breeding processes that are found in nature. EvoFIT presents users with sets of complete faces and they
select a few that resemble the criminal. The software then breeds these faces together to produce more faces. While the faces at the start have random characteristics, repeating the selection and breeding process a few times allows the system to converge on a specific identity. Using
procedures that mirror policework as far as possible, the latest version of EvoFIT now evolves a face that can be correctly named 45% of the time when constructed following a two day delay. EvoFIT is in use in a dozen police forces across the UK and abroad, and reports from the police indicate a
success (arrest) rate in the region of 50%.

While EvoFIT has led to significant improvements in facial identification, it has always been difficult to get a good-enough image to reproduce in newsprint. However, Dr Frowd’s team have experimented with “stretching” the faces and getting people to look at them sideways on, rather than looking straight at the image in front of them.

In testing, people were twice as likely to correctly identify a composite when it was stretched and turned sideways (36%) as opposed to when they viewed them normally (17%).


Dr Charlie Frowd is based in the School of Psychology at the University of Central Lancashire, Preston. He started his academic career twelve years ago at the University of Stirling, in Scotland, where he completed his PhD in Psychology and then worked on a series of government-funded grants with Vicki Bruce and Peter Hancock. Two years ago, he joined the School of Psychology at UCLan and is now a senior lecturer. His main research interest is in the area of police facial composites (pictures of suspects to crime, as seen in the newspapers and on TV crime programmes). More...

The Development of a Wireless Electrostatic Mark Lifting Method and its use at Crime Scenes

The Development of a Wireless Electrostatic Mark Lifting Method and its use at Crime Scenes
Robert Milne and Grahame Sandling, CSI Ltd

CSI Ltd have two areas of interest. The first is to do with materials involved in a technique called electrostatic mark lifting, which was demonstrated during the seminar.  The second involves pattern recognition.  See presentation below..

CSI Ltd produce their own footwear evidence software called Treadmark, which currently has the latest UK beta version working very well in the Leicestershire Constabulary which has the best footwear evidence detection rate in the UK. The software stores footwear marks and scans of suspected offenders shoes for measurement comparison and overlay enabling the ease of handling of the evidence type for screening. The software connects on line to the National Police Improvement Agency's (NPIA) National Footwear Reference Collection (NFRC) of over 19,000 reference records from anywhere on the internet. We began to look at machine vision and Treadmark can for zigzag patterns search on wavelength, amplitude and periodicity but we seek to improve on this basic approach and see a considerable market in effective automatic pattern recognition not only in our application but in many other areas.

CSI Ltd has produced a students (Colleges) version of Treadmark (one licence for 5 stand alone computers) in modern 64 bit format ready for market so that students of forensic science can actually use software actually used by police services and access the NFRC. The stand alone licence version can however communicate with other stand alone's or Treadmark in networks by prior arrangement. In this way small police services can afford a system and be networked without the expense of actually having a server based licence designed for larger organizations or states.

More...

2011 seminars

The role of corporate intelligence in tackling organised criminality

Speaker: Roger Aldridge, Director, KPMG Forensic  
Audience: SECReT students More...

Evaluating DNA evidence from minuscule, degraded and/or mixed crime stains

Speaker: Professor David Balding, UCL Genetics Institute
Audience: SECReT students More...

The DNA field experiment and the Human Trafficking Reporting System (HTRS)

Speaker: Nancy G. La Vigne, Director of the Justice Policy Center of the Urban Institute, USA
Audience: SECReT students More...

Crime science and epidemiology: Parallel worlds?

Speaker: Professor Paul Fine, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Audience: SECReT students More...

Soils ain't soils

Speaker: Professor James Robertson, University of Canberra
Audience: SECReT students More...

How to Hunt a Poacher

Speaker: Dr Andrew Lemieux, Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement
Audience: SECReT students


More...

Myths, misunderstandings and mistakes of jury research

Speaker: Professor Cheryl Thomas, UCL Judicial Institute
Audience: SECReT students


Prof Cheryl Thomas is Professor of Judicial Studies; this is the first chair in judicial studies in the United Kingdom. She is also Director of the UCL Jury Project and Co-Director of the UCL Judicial Institute (with Professor Dame Hazel Genn). A specialist in judicial studies, she has conducted ground-breaking research in the United Kingdom and other jurisdictions on juries, judicial decision-making, the role of diversity in the justice system, and the appointment and training of judges.  More...

Hotspot mapping, near repeat analysis, and risk terrain modelling

Speaker: Les Kennedy, Rutgers University, Newark, USA 
Audience: SECReT students More...

On privacy and integrity

Speaker: Dr Gus Hosein, LSE Information Systems and Innovation
Audience: SECReT students More...

2010 seminars

Roger Graeff image

Exploring the limits of the justice system in reducing harm

Speaker: Roger Graeff OBE, crime documentary maker
Audience: SECReT students

More...

The UK’s International Counter-Terrorism Strategy

Speaker: Professor Adam Ogilvie-Smith, UK Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism
Audience: SECReT students
More...

How cities can be designed to resist infectious diseases

Speaker: Dr Ka-Man Lai, UCL CEGE
Audience: SECReT students
More...

Advances in fingerprint identification

Speaker: Dr Mandeep Dhami, Resilience and Security, dstl-MoD Defense Science Technology Lab
Audience: SECReT students
More...

dstl and crime science

Speaker: Jen Le Breton-Edis, Head, Resilience and Security, dstl-MoD Defense Science Technology Lab
Audience: SECReT students
More...

Skip Palenik image

Developing investigative leads through the analysis and interpretation of microscopic trace evidence

Speaker: Dr Skip Palenik, Founder, Microtrace Labs, US
Audience: SECReT students

More...

Chris Hassell image

The work of the FBI lab

Speaker: Dr Chris Hassell, Director, FBI Laboratory
Audience: SECReT students

More...

Fred Chang

Cybersecurity futures

Speaker: Professor Fred Chang, Director, Centre for Information Assurance and Security, University of Texas, Austin
Audience: SECReT students

More...

Bernard Silverman image

Statistics and crime

Speaker: Professor Bernard Silverman, Chief Scientific Advisor to the Home Office
Audience: SECReT students

More...

Jeremy Crump image

The new national police improvement strategy

Speaker: Jeremy Crump, Strategy Director, National Police Improvement Agency (NPIA)
Audience: SECReT students

More...

The dark side of creativity

Speaker: Professor David Cropley, Deputy Director, Defence and Systems Institute, University of South Australia
Audience: SECReT students
More...

Interagency cooperation across the intelligence community

Speaker: Sir Stephen Lander, Chair of SOCA (Serious Organised Crime Agency) and former Director-General of MI5  More...

Case study: HSBC-SAS real time global fraud analysis

Speaker: Dr Laurie Miles, SAS Software
Audience: SECReT student More...

Nick Ross image

What is crime science?

Speaker: Nick Ross
Audience: SECReT students
More...

Goldman Sachs image

The security research agenda at a global bank

Speaker: Nicholas Alston, Goldman Sachs
Audience: SECReT students
More...

Crime and the decriminalisation of cannabis

Speaker: Professor Imran Rasul, UCL Economics More...

2009 seminars

Kacper Gradon image

Violent crime telegraphed over the Internet. Can we prevent mass murder?

Speaker: Dr Kacper Gradon, Faculty of Law, University of Warsaw
More...

Begint: Dec 14, 2009 11:00:00 AM

Bruce Schneier image

Bruce Schneier

Bruce Schneier is an internationally renowned security technologist, described by The Economist as a security ‘guru’.
More...

Begint: Dec 7, 2009 4:30:00 PM

Industry engagement evening

9 December 2014

Each year, in December, at the end of the first academic term, UCL SECReT organizes an industry evening at which current and prospective industry, academic and public sector partners of the programme are invited to come along and meet our current student cohort.

Industry Engagement Evening for UCL SECReT: Woburn House Date: 18:00-20:30, Thursday 9th December 2014


Venue:  - Woburn House, 20 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HQ

CLOSEST STATIONS ARE RUSSELL SQUARE, EUSTON AND EUSTON SQUARE.

Registration: The event is complimentary. Please register via this short form: Booking Form

This event is designed specifically to create mutually beneficial interactions between industry and public-sector organisations and the students of UCL SECReT. Industry/public sector organisations can gain by accessing some of the brightest minds in the UK to work on real-world research problems central to their own agendas, whilst students benefit from mentorship, access to data, facilities and practitioner expertise.

The evening includes a briefing, for current and prospective partners, of the aims, structure and focus of the centre, and the format and content of the course.

Our current batch of 17 students will introduce themselves and their research interests by presenting ‘crime scenarios’ (it will be up the audience to decide which team has done the best job!) The students come from a range of backgrounds and research interests ranging from forensic and computer sciences through to engineering, laws, risk, intelligence and psychology. Their profiles can be accessed here.


Benefiting industry and students

We expect our students to work on ‘real-world’ problems. This event is designed to create mutually beneficial interactions between organisations and the students of UCL SECReT. Organisations can gain by accessing some of the brightest minds in the UK to work on real-world research problems central to their own agendas, whilst students benefit from mentorship, access to data, facilities and practitioner expertise. The students come from a range of backgrounds and research interests ranging from forensic and computer sciences through to engineering, laws, risk, intelligence and psychology.

UCL SECReT Industry Engagement Evening Presentation

No articles are available.