- Policy strategy
- UCL Policy Commissions
- Policy briefings
- News and Commentaries
- Past policy events
- Lessons for Global Health from India
- The Science of Happiness
- Trust In Europe During A Time of Crisis
- Climate Change and Financial Risk
- The Green Moment?
- Jack Straw Lecture
- Going Low-Carbon: the governance of climate change technologies
- Transparency and Lobbying in the EU
- Challenging Behaviours: Effective Care for People with Intellectual Disabilities
- Framing the Climate Change Debate
- The Future of Healthcare in Europe
- Should the UK adopt the alternative vote?
- Evidence-based policy: from development to delivery
- Policy placements
- Policy commentaries
- Policy engagement and partnerships
- UCL Research & Parliament
- Get involved
- Policy expertise
PUBLIC POLICY MAILING LIST
RESEARCH INFLUENCING POLICY
VIDEO INTRODUCTION – UCL PUBLIC POLICY AND UCL GRAND CHALLENGES
Framing the Climate Change Debate
How can the debate on climate change be framed in a way that will encourage rationale dialogue and effective response?
This event was held on Monday 16 May 2011. Read a report of the event here.
Addressing climate change remains one of the most pressing challenges that we currently face. Yet with many people in the UK unconvinced either that climate change is occurring at all, or that it will have negative consequences, there remains a substantial challenge in simply agreeing the need for action. Uncertainties – and recent controversies – over the reliability of science and failure to achieve a rational debate and dialogue mean that government is hampered in its ability to act and there is no strong public imperative to do so. This has knock-on consequences for global initiatives to address climate change, so that securing agreements through processes such as the Copenhagen and Cancun meetings is highly problematic.
However, the need to agree action on climate change is increasingly urgent, as the direct and indirect consequences become ever-more severe and we reach the limit of the amount of carbon we can ‘safely’ use. Whilst Government has set some ambitious targets, it is far from clear how and if they will be achieved. Public debate remains polarised and many people are simply unconcerned with climate change. Dialogue has stagnated. We urgently need to consider new ways of framing the debate to engage the public in considering what problems we face and what action that will be needed to address them.
This event will
discuss the public perspectives of climate change and how these inform the
public dialogue as well as how they relate to the policy discourse and political
response to problems of climate change. It will examine how the public debate is currently framed and the role
of universities, policy-makers and others in re-framing and shaping that debate
in both public and political spheres, with a view to enabling more coordinated
actions and policies to address climate change.
Chaired by Andrew Pendleton, Associate Director for Climate Change, Transport and Energy, IPPR
The role of science in the climate change debate
Professor Mark Maslin,UCL Geography and Co-Director, UCL Environment Institute
Response from Professor Nick Pidgeon, Director, Understanding Risk Research Group, University of Cardiff
Public attitudes to climate change
Professor Chris Rapley, UCL Earth Sciences
Response from Matthew Lockwood, Head of Climate Change, Institute of Development Studies
Climate change and the policy context
Professor Maria Lee, UCL Laws
Response from Dr Slava Mikhaylov , UCL Political Science
Summing up from Professor Yvonne Rydin (Director, UCL Environment Institute)
Sir David Davies Lecture Theatre G08 Roberts Building
Page last modified on 01 nov 11 16:35