Scotland’s Hidden History, by Ian Armit
Tempus 2006 (2nd edition; first published 1998). 190
pp, 87 figs, incl. 10 maps, 25 colour plates. pb. ISBN 0-7524-3764-X (£15.99)
This is an updated version of Ian Armit’s popular guide to Scottish archaeological
sites, first published (in paperback and hardback) in 1998. As Armit explains, the
revisions have been necessitated by new discoveries and advances in our understanding
of Scottish prehistory and early history to around AD 1000, with the bibliography
and chapter introductions showing the biggest changes from the first edition. The
production of this second edition reflects the success in sales of the first.
The volume is aimed at the intelligent ‘lay’ reader, and is intended as a guide
book for use by those who want to visit the traces of Scotland’s ‘hidden’ past –
hidden, in the sense of not being documented (to any degree, if at all) by contemporaneous
written records. It starts with a brief (14 page) introduction to the 9000 years
covered by the book. Subsequent chapters provide a chronological run-through of
the principal types of site that may be encountered, including a section on ‘Broch
towers and the Atlantic zone’ – one of Armit’s own specialist topics. A brief introduction
to each of these chapters, together with a map showing featured sites, is followed
by selections of sites deemed worthy of a visit, with each entry including information
on site ownership, location (as National Grid Reference) and directions on how to
access the sites, as well as a description of the site and often some interesting
nuggets of additional information (e.g. on the nature of vitrification on Iron Age
and Early Historic forts, pp. 93–4). Many entries are accompanied by photographs
of the sites or by Alan Braby’s vivid and evocative reconstruction drawings; site
plans are rarer, and images of artefacts rarer still. The volume ends with a list
of recommended museums and visitor centres to visit, publications to read, a glossary
and an index to the sites mentioned in the book.
The book has many strengths. Armit writes in a clear and accessible way, without
talking down to the reader, and it is clear that he has visited all the sites and
done his homework. Armit’s years as an Inspector of Ancient Monuments with Historic
Scotland in the 1990s have clearly paid off, and the book comes with that institution’s
seal of approval proudly adorning the back cover. Site descriptions are usefully
embellished by fascinating, bite-sized insights into how the featured sites fit
within the broader narrative of prehistory and early history. One example, on p.122,
explains how a 4th century late Roman account claiming that Orkney submitted to
Claudius in AD 43, long before Agricola’s Scottish campaign of AD 79, may not be
as fanciful as formerly thought, given that Claudian period amphora sherds have
been found at the broch of Gurness (suggesting long-distance links with the south
of England). His discussion of the function of souterrains and brochs is interesting
(even though one suspects that souterrain function will continue to be debated by
archaeologists); and the geographical scope of the sites covered in this guide is
extensive.
Armit’s choice of sites to visit hits all the right spots, taking the reader on
a wonderful (if inevitably expensive and car-bound) tour of Scotland. And he is
arguably wise to omit the Orcadian Iron Age site of Mine Howe from his list of sites
to visit, since the deep stepped shaft is very vulnerable to damage from visitors’
feet.
The book has some drawbacks, however. These are mainly presentational and, to a
large extent, attributable to the publisher’ desire to minimise production costs.
In terms of user-friendliness, the maps showing the location of sites featured in
each chapter should have been both larger and accompanied by a list of those sites.
The map showing ‘Scotland’ in the introductory chapter is useful for those unaware
of this country’s location (even though it includes part of northern England and
Northern Ireland!), but it would have been more useful as a full-page image, showing
the location of all the sites featured in the book (and accompanied by a key listing
the sites). For those wishing to get to the individual sites, Armit recommends the
use of Ordnance Survey Landranger maps, but each entry should have specified the
identification number of the relevant map. For those not able to splash out on these
wonderful but expensive maps, the ‘How to get there’ guidelines might suffice, but
the occasional area map showing the location of sites in relation to principal routes
might have been useful, especially if a tour of a particular region or island is
being planned.
The matter of over-reduced illustrations is an irritant at various points in the
book, most notably with fig. 26 (p.51), where ground plans of Orcadian chamber tombs
are reproduced at so small a scale that it is impossible to see clearly the various
arrangements of human remains to which the key alludes. Equally irritating is the
use of line drawings of certain artefacts (such as the Shulishader axe, fig. 14,
or the Culduthel Beaker cist assemblage, fig. 5) where excellent photographs could
have been provided (granted, at a price) by the National Museums Scotland. The inadequacy,
or total lack of provision, of an illustration budget by publishers, is a perennial
problem facing authors. Publishers should bear in mind that the appearance of a
book can be improved greatly by using the best possible illustrations. A similar
cost-related issue is that of the inclusion of colour images: with modern printing
technology it is possible to print integrated colour images through the text, rather
than relying on discrete colour plate spreads (which, in this cases, look rather
washed out in some cases, and do not do justice to the original photographs).
As regards the contents, it is clear to this reviewer that Armit is strongest when
dealing with his own specialist period (i.e. the first millennia BC and AD). The
temptation to critique his potted version of the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition
will be resisted, although the significance of Continental links ought to have been
given more emphasis; similarly, his treatment of the Beaker phenomenon makes no
reference to the Amesbury Archer, whose discovery reignited the debate about the
nature and extent of immigration around 2500/2400 BC. (Also, incidentally, the Culduthel
assemblage shown in fig. 5 is not really typical, as the caption suggests: most
Beaker graves have only the pot as a surviving grave good.) Granted, it is impossible
to cover all the aspects of prehistory in a few pages, but a few tricks have been
missed in his coverage of early prehistory (e.g. the important Early Neolithic discoveries
in East Lothian during the A1 upgrade, or around Kintore, both resulting from developer-funded
archaeology). And it is unfortunate that the re-assessment of Croft Moraig (Bradley
& Sheridan 2005) must have come out just too late to be accommodated within Armit’s
text.
Final niggles: i) figure 33 is mis-captioned, since the illustration shows the Stones
of Stenness, rather than the Ring of Brodgar; ii) Isbister is not under Local Authority
ownership; iii) ‘chambered tombs’ should read ‘chamber tombs’ throughout; iv) the
opportunity to include some fairly spectacular images (e.g. of the full moon at
Callanish, or the sun shining into Maes Howe) has not been taken; and v) there is
the occasional comma in the wrong place.
Overall, however, this book is to be commended. It is bound to sell well because
it is appropriately priced, has an attractive cover and title, will appeal as an
authoritative guidebook, and is sure to be on sale at all Historic Scotland outlets
and good booksellers. And the great thing about current archaeology in Scotland
is that so much exciting work is going on that there will be plenty to add for the
next edition, should the newly-crowned Professor Armit at Bradford University choose
to take up the challenge...
Alison Sheridan
National Museums Scotland
References
Bradley, R.J. & Sheridan, J.A., 2005. Croft Moraig and the chronology of stone circles.
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 71, 269–81
Review Submitted: February 2007
The views expressed in this review are not necessarily those
of the Society or the Reviews Editor.
|