Changing Materialities at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995-99
Seasons, ed. Ian Hodder
Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs, 2005. Çatalhöyük
Research Project Volume 5, 3956pp (plus CD 200 pages), 275 illustrations, 246 tables,
hb ISBN 1-902937-28. (£59)
This book forms one of a series of four (sic) volumes (this is Volume 5)
detailing the results of the recent excavations at Çatalhöyük. It follows on from
the stratigraphic narrative (Volume 3), the inhabitation/environmental analysis
(Volume 4), with Volume 6 forming the final synthetic monograph, bringing together
and linking all of the work through a series of themed topics (eg, social memory,
trade, art etc.).
This volume effectively deals with all aspects of material culture that were excavated
between 1995 and 1999 from three main areas of the East Mound of Çatalhöyük, from
buildings that cover over a thousand years of occupation (from the mid 7th to mid-late
6th millennium cal BC). The analysis is focussed upon 355 priority units, and artefact
categories discussed include ceramics and other fired and unfired clay materials
(clay balls, mudbrick and figurines), chipped and ground-stone, worked bone, basketry
and beads.
The typological and comparative issues concerning the materials are addressed by
the specialists as well as wider themes including exchange, scale of production,
specialisation, consumption, use and deposition. The central theme that runs through
all of the chapters is that of continuity (eg, in house rebuilding, repetition of
things done in houses) versus degrees and speed of change over time. Hodder’s tenet
which he states in the Introduction is that of entanglement. That is, through time,
people’s involvement with objects becomes more marked as social complexity increases.
As the inhabitants of the site get progressively caught up in material engagements,
these relationships start to act back on them. He states that ‘In making things
humans make themselves’ (p. 20). Recent notions of materiality argue that material
has an active role (‘thingness’) and constitutes social concepts and relations (eg,
see Chapman 2000 and Tilley 1999).
Many of the 19 chapters demonstrate that the rate of change with regards to material
culture speeds up in the upper later levels. There is also, however, evidence for
marked continuity in many object categories which may relate to an attempt to create
enduring links with the past. Perhaps certain codified rules may have repressed
change.
Chapter 2 by Cross May deals with the statistical integration of the contextual
analysis of the all the material culture data sets. The results of the analysis
are presented in clear graphics, which allow the reader to identify patterns within
the datasets easily. A number of important issues are addressed which concern the
structuring principles of all archaeological data sets – such as composition, diversity
of assemblages, and biases of recovery. The statistical multivariate approach to
contextual variation has produced some promising results with regards to the relationship
of different artefacts within different contextual types (floors/ room fills/ middens/external
spaces etc.).
Chapter 3 on heavy residue analysis by Cessford and Mitrović involves a general
comparison of the diversity and density of artefacts between different types of
deposits and their spatial and temporal variation, with a focus on micro-patterning.
There are lots of graphs, some of which are rather complicated, and much of the
text is peppered with detailed information. Patterns identified include the fact
that some artefacts (eg, pottery, sharp obsidian) are generally absent in floor
deposits and that middens are most likely to contain all material categories, neither
of which may come as a surprise. Despite the huge corpus of data discussed there
is not a great deal of interpretation concerning what the patterns may mean but
the authors do state that the ‘analysis at this stage is relatively superficial’.
Chapter 4 on the absolute dating, by Cessford et al. provides a very impressive
sequence of dates that span the one thousand year occupation of the site, following
careful selection and sampling procedures to minimise factors such as residuality.
Some new techniques are employed such as the AMS dating of inhaled particulated
carbon adhering to the ribs of skeletons of older individuals. There is a suggestion
that buildings may have had a use-life of 45-90 years (not disagreeing substantially
with Mellaart’s original suggestions of 50-100 yrs), although in later levels construction
and use became more dynamic. This is one of the fullest publications of a sequence
of radiocarbon dates from any tell-site in Anatolia and provides an excellent and
refined chronological basis for placing the site within a wider temporal framework,
the importance of which cannot be underestimated.
Chapter 5 by Last discusses the small Neolithic pottery assemblage. The vegetable-tempered
pottery of the earlier levels is replaced by mineral-tempered fabrics in the later
levels, particularly levels VI-V. This change coincides with transformations within
clay ball technology and indicates developments within food preparation and cooking.
Last stresses, however, that the basic ‘recipe’ for pottery production, once accepted,
remains relatively stable. Even with the shift to better clays and mineral temper
from Level VI onwards, other elements (such as forms and surface finish) change
relatively little.
The clay ball analysis by Atalay (Chapter 6) focuses mainly upon their function
and concludes that they were associated with cooking. Evidence for this comes from
sooting and residues on the balls and the fact that their breakage patterns are
consistent with heat stress. Residue analysis (Chapter 7) found no lipids on the
clay balls to support this, but only a very small number were analysed. This is
a well structured chapter, which benefits from detailed analysis. Atalay suggests
that perhaps clay balls often form house foundation deposits because symbolically
they were associated with warmth and cooking, and hence imbued with positive attributes
that could be transferred to newly built houses and their inhabitants.
One of the most famous and perhaps controversial categories of material culture
from Çatalhöyük is tackled in Chapter 9 by Hamilton – the figurines. The analysis
sets out to establish the uses of the figurines and how they relate to an understanding
of Neolithic social structures. Hamilton re-examines the context of the figurines
and argues that they were not just from potentially ‘votive’ locations (eg, between
houses, within plaster bins), but also from general domestic refuse and building
fills. She suggests that perhaps figurines were ‘made for the moment (perhaps for
a wish or prayer) and then deliberately broken and abandoned’ (p.187). Many of the
zoomorphic figurines had stabbing marks and Hamilton proposes that they may have
been linked to hunting magic. However a number of these stabbed representations
appear to be of domestic sheep/goat so perhaps this analogy does not work so neatly.
This chapter could benefit from cross comparison with other types of clay objects.
Furthermore, many of the figurines referred to by the author are not illustrated,
and it is hard for the reader to be objective in following the author’s descriptions
and interpretations of them when this element is lacking.
The longest chapter (Chapter 11) in this book by Carter et al. presents
a traditional technological and typological analysis of chipped stone and details
through time the various industries and raw materials and relates them to the different
modes of production and consumption (chaînes opératoires). This is then
related to activity at other contemporary sites in central Anatolia and beyond.
The main issues addressed are how the raw material arrived at the site, how it circulated
in the community, where and how it was used and the contexts it was discarded in.
The final objective is to understand contextual patterning and explore variations
of this through time.
This chapter is written in the language of a lithics specialist, and the lack of
plates and illustrations within the main body of the text (most are relegated to
the accompanying CD) means that a non-lithics specialist may find it quite hard
to follow. A small number of illustrations just showing the main type fossils for
each level would have been really helpful. Their absence is a shame because the
detailed analysis that the lithic specialists have undertaken at Çatalhöyük over
eight or more seasons demonstrates that this is one of the most fully studied and
detailed Neolithic chipped stone assemblages in central Anatolia, and indeed, more
widely within the Near East. The work published here will surely form a core text
for all present and future lithic specialists working in this area. However, reading
the text and flicking to the figures on the computer at the same time is made even
harder by the fact that none of the illustrations on the CD have captions (eg, prismatic
blade or backed double end-scraper), only context and lithic numbers which you then
have to cross-reference back to the main body of the text. Furthermore, the chipped
stone has been drawn by three or more illustrators in quite different styles. It
is unfortunate that this is not a user-friendly reference text.
This chapter demonstrates a very thorough analysis, and a number of important observations
and interpretations are made. Some of the main patterns drawn out include the fact
that the flake industry is the dominant mode of obsidian working from the earliest
levels until level VIB when there is a radical shift to the prismatic blade industry.
Furthermore, cores become more exhausted in the later levels suggesting more intensive
reduction strategies. Contextual analysis of the lithics is frustrated to some extent
as it is difficult to relate most of the chipped stone from within buildings to
activities. Many of the placed deposits, however, tend to relate to fire installations,
and the authors argue that this association with heat and light may be linked to
the medium of transformation and the potent power of volcanoes: the source of the
obsidian.
The vast majority (over 90%) of chipped stone in all levels is obsidian, the nearest
source of which is over 200km away, as confirmed by elemental characterisation (Chapter
12). This detailed analysis has demonstrated that the shifts in the modes of knapping
obsidian correlate with increased exploitation of different Cappadocian sources
over time. Both the analysis of the mudbrick by Tung and the ground-stone by Baysal
and Wright are at an early stage and only preliminary conclusions can be made at
present. The final few chapters on the beads, basketry and worked bone are quite
short, dealing with relatively small assemblages of material. The only clearly deliberate
deposition of beads is in burial contexts, where they tend to be associated with
females and juveniles. Hamilton could make more of this association, particularly
with babies (protection, votive offerings associated with untimely death etc.) and
also of where the beads were placed on the body and whether burial beads differ
from the other types of beads found?
The worked bone chapter by Russell is eloquently written, easy to follow and well
illustrated, with a good range of both plates and line drawings to demonstrate the
various points made. Worked bone was manufactured to produce a range of objects
including tools and ornaments). The extent of repair, reuse and resharpening that
some bone objects were subject to is interesting. Furthermore, it is clear that
specific animal bones (eg, sheep/goat metapodials) were deliberately chosen for
much of the worked bone. Russell concisely describes how the tools and ornaments
were made, the contexts in which they were used and deposited and how their functions
changed through time.
It cannot be stressed enough just how enormous a piece of work this volume represents.
Overall this monograph is the culmination of tireless, thorough, extensive and intensive
analysis by the dedicated specialist team at Çatalhöyük. These specialists are to
be congratulated for their hard work, detailed investigations and stimulating observations
and interpretations. The task is a daunting one – the vast corpus of material from
five long seasons of excavation at such a finds-rich tell must be studied on site
within the time-frame of the field or study season, as very little can be exported.
Detailed methodological sections are included in almost all of the chapters and
provide core texts for any student embarking upon analysis of material culture –
the wealth of the specialists’ knowledge and their detailed and intimate understanding
is made explicit. Furthermore, they share important lessons they have learnt and
how and why they have revised their methodologies in the light of pitfalls and problems
encountered.
There is one small criticism which is that for a book completely dedicated to understanding
and celebrating material culture, it is remarkably lacking in images of such, at
least within the main body of the text. The vast majority of illustrations have
been relegated to the CD. Although a picture may not tell a thousand words, it does
seem sad that photographs and drawings of such beautiful artefacts have become divorced
from the main body of the text, while graphs and tables seem to take their place.
The lack of colour is also surprising especially given that colour photographs illustrating
the three dimensional nature of the objects could have been put on the CD at no
extra cost.
It would be unfair to be critical of the fact that the material categories are at
different stages of analysis since this is a reflection of the dynamic nature of
the project, with various specialists becoming involved at different times. It must
be remembered that the excavations and analysis at Çatalhöyük is very much a ‘work
in progress’, so eventually all of the specialist analysis will become comparable.
There is not too much cross-fertilisation and comparison between all the various
specialists although such comparisons may have been kept deliberately for Volume
6. Many of the specialists seem to focus upon their own material and fail to make
even conceptual links between different cultural categories or similar technologies
(eg, pottery, mudbrick, figurines, clay balls), although several urge the reader
to engage in other chapters and cross-reference with other volumes. The impression
given is that the specialists were not briefed on the overarching agenda of entanglement
and increased complexity in material culture through time, and thus few relate their
conclusions back to the theoretical considerations set out by Hodder in the Introduction.
The majority of the chapters perpetuate a traditional archaeological division of
labour by dealing with a single category of material – which ironically is exactly
what Hodder had been at pains to move away from (eg, 1997; 1999), although synthetic
monograph (volume 6) should remedy this partly.
With respect to the contextual analysis, it is clear that sometimes the specialists
are frustrated by the fact that the Neolithic occupants of Çatalhöyük were fastidious
and house-proud. For instance, house floors tended to be scoured clean prior to
decommissioning the space or structure. There was very little in the way of ‘in
situ’ artefacts relating to occupation and use and the majority of material culture
comes from make up layers (or backfill within buildings) and middens. Thus the context
of deposition may bear little relation to the original use of the object. It is
clear that the mound of Çatalhöyük still stubbornly refuses to give up all of its
secrets no matter how much science and detailed comprehensive analysis is thrown
at it!
To conclude this work will undoubtedly become an absolute key text for all students
and researchers of both material culture and Neolithic Anatolia. The methodology
and analysis is set at a very high level and this work certainly provides a bar
that all future investigation in this area should endeavour to reach. It will certainly
become one of the seminal texts and set the standard and agenda for a number of
years to come. The volume should not be read in isolation but readers should be
encouraged to cross-reference this work with the stratigraphic, environmental and
synthetic discussions in Volumes 3, 4 and 6 respectively.
Catriona Gibson
Wessex Archaeology
References
Chapman, J. 2000. Fragmentation in Archaeology. People, Places and Broken Objects
in the Prehistory of Southeast Europe. London: Routledge
Hodder, I. 1997. ‘Always Momentary, fluid and flexible’: towards a reflexive excavation
methodology. Antiquity 71, 691-700
Hodder, I. 1999. The Archaeological Process: an Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell
Tilley, C. 1999. Metaphor and Material Culture. Oxford: Blackwell
Review Submitted: December 2006
The views expressed in this review are not necessarily those
of the Society or the Reviews Editor.
|